doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. ... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies -- all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth. -- George Orwell, 1984
HOME ARCHIVES ARTICLES INDEX
NEWS
The Advocate The Age
AFP
Antiwar.com
Associated Press
AP Breaking News
BBC
Bloomberg.com
BuzzFlash
Globe and Mail
Guardian Unlimited
The Hill
Indy Media Center
Intervention Magazine
Mother Jones
The Nation
News.com.au

Reuters AlertNet
S.J. Mercury News
SF Gate
Toronto Star

COLUMNISTS
Eric Alterman
Jimmy Breslin
Joe Conason
Maureen Dowd
Ellen Goodman
Mike Hersh
Jim Hightower
Arianna Huffington
Molly Ivins
Nicholas D. Kristof
Paul Krugman
Mark Morford
Greg Palast
Anna Quindlen
Ted Rall Columns
Robert Scheer
Michelangelo Signorile
Helen Thomas

COMMENTARY
AlterNet
American Prospect
Angry Liberal
AntiCoulter
Black Commentator
Broadside
C.S. Monitor
Common Dreams
CounterPunch
Crisis Papers
Daily Howler
Daily Weasel
Drudge This!
Evil GOP Bastards
Democrats.com
In These Times
Online Journal
The Progressive
Rack Jite
Salon.com
Slate
Smudge Report
Spleen
TomPaine.com
Truthout
Unknown News
Venik"s Aviation
Village Voice
War Times
Washington Free Press
ZMag

KINDRED BLOGGERS
All Day Permanent Red
American Politics Journal
ArchPundit
Astroboi
Back In Iraq 2.0
Barbaric Yawp
BartCop
Binational Times
Bush League
Bush Lunacy
Camp-XRay
Caution... Opinions
Counterspin Central
Daily Dystopian
Daily Kos
Dean Justin
Dick Jones
Easter Lemming
Everyday Thoughts
Expand Your Mind
Free pie
Hegemoney
Hot Air and...
Ingenious
I'm So Brok'n
Jadedgrrl
Jewels9445
Left of Center
LiberalArtists.com
LiberalOasis
Liberal Soundbag
MadKane
MakeThemAccountable
Malarkey...
Marijke
Memes.org
Metapop
MidEastLog
Natalie Davis
Nathan Newman
No More Mr. Nice Blog
No War Blog
Nofear.org
PeaceBlogs
Prison Planet
RightWingSlayer
Road to Surfdom
RuminateThis
Running from the...
Ruth Group
Seeing The Forest
The Shark Shack
Shocking Elk
Silent Lucidity
Slab
Smirking Chimp
So anyway...
Spring will come again
Stewed Tea
Swirlspice
Talking Points Memo
TalkLeft
TBOGG
Thankless Days
This Modern World
Toby's Political Diary
Tomb of Horrors
TomDispatch
Violence/Women
Warblogs:cc
Weekly Lowdown
WireTap
Witchfondler
WTF Is It Now??
Wyeth Wire

LIBERAL RADIO
Mike Malloy
Randi Rhodes
Peter Werbe
Ray Taliaferro
Radio Left 1
Radio Left 2

RESEARCH
ACLU
Amnesty International
AU.org
Electronic Frontier Fdn
Free Am. Immigration
Gray Panthers
Human Rights Campn
Human Rights Watch
MALDEF
NAACP
NCADP
NOW
NOW Legal Defense
Not In Our Name
MoveOn.org
Privacy International
PunkVoter.com
So. Poverty Law Ctr
Take Back the Media
Texas Civil Rights Proj
Veterans Against War
Veterans for Peace

RESEARCH
9-11 Files
9/11 Timeline
America Held Hostile
American Hegemony
AWOLBush
Bush Scorecard of Evil
Bush Watch
Chickenhawk Database
Cooperative Research
DubyaSpeak
Enemies Relig Frdm
Enron Owns the GOP
EnronGate
Forgotten History
Freeworld
GoQueer.com
Memory Hole
MLK Papers Project
Opensecrets.org
Rumsfeld-Saddam
Smoking Gun
Twisted History
Unanswered Questions

WATCHDOGS
Adbusters
Black Box Voting
ClearChannelSucks.org
conwebwatch
FAIR.org
Media Alliance
Media Transparency
Media Whores Online
OMB Watch
O'Reilly Sucks
Premiere Radio Ntwks
School of Americas
Rush Limbaugh Online

LEFTY LAUGHS
About Political Humor
All Hat No Cattle
As Good As News
Betty Bowers
Boondocks
Bush or Chimp?
Chick Museum
Don't be afraid...
Empower Amurrica
Fdn Patriotic America
Funny Times
Faux News Channel
GWBush.com
GWBush04.com
Homeland-USA
Landover Baptist
Last Laugh
I'm Not Ready
nostamj cartoons
Onion
Political Strikes
Republican Press
Ted Rall Comics
WhiteHouse.org
Specious Report

DA MAN
Dean for America
Howard Dean 2004

JUST WORTH IT
1984
Democratic Underground
Dennis Miller
Granny D
Here in Reality
Michael Moore
Popdex Technical Difficulties
Technorati
Tolerance.org
Warmonger/Peacenik
  Tuesday, June 24, 2003



Okay, I retract that: Jack Straw is not fat. And he didn't lie; he's right: As far as I can find, neither he nor Tony Blair has "ever used the words 'immediate' or 'imminent' in relation to the threat posed by Saddam Hussein."

 

Guess The Straw Man's never seen the episode of "The Brady Bunch" where Greg tries to weasel out of taking Bobby to the frog-jumping contest, but gets nailed by the agreement he's made with his parents to use "exact words," eh?

 

Talk about splitting hairs:

 

Straw: We never said Iraq was imminent threat

 

British FM claims Downing Street talked about current and serious threat posed by Iraq rather than imminent.

 

Britain never claimed that Saddam Hussein's regime posed an "immediate and imminent threat" to the world with its weapons of mass destruction, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said Tuesday.

 

Straw challenged the adjectives used in the run-up to the Iraq war as he appeared before a parliamentary committee looking into allegations that the British government exaggerated the threat posed by Saddam's regime.

 

"Neither the prime minister or I or anyone acting on our behalf have ever used the words 'immediate' or 'imminent' in relation to the threat posed by Saddam Hussein," Straw testified.

 

"What we talked about (in a September 2002 dossier on Iraq and weapons of mass destruction) was a 'current and serious' threat - which is very different," he said.

 

Straw: We never said Iraq was imminent threat

Middle East Online

June 24, 2003

 

Right. Neither you nor Poodle Boy ever said "imminent" or "immediate":

 

The dossier we publish... concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes, including against his own Shia population; and that he is actively trying to acquire nuclear weapons capability.

 

Tony Blair's statement to Parliament on Iraq

September 24, 2002

 

So "45 minutes" is neither "imminent" nor "immediate," Straw? What the hell is "imminent" or "immediate," then? Ten minutes? Five seconds? After the fact?

 

Okay, Straw. You're right. Yeah, right.

 

 

Related articles:

 

Full text of Tony Blair's foreword to the dossier on Iraq [The Guardian, September 24, 2002]

 

Did Blair lie to us? Forty-five minutes! Good God! You could see the MPs' hairs standing up on end, calculating how far this holocaust might reach. That precise timing resonated with a generation that grew up discussing what to do in the four-minute nuclear warning - run a mile, boil an egg, have sex... In that speech he over-egged it and he must have known it. Whether Downing Street demanded the fateful "45 minutes" or not, he knew - and it is there in cold print - that the chilling words ran far beyond what anyone knew for sure. [The Guardian, May 30, 2003]

 

Intelligence case oversold? Jack Straw: "If you look at, for example, the key speech that the Prime Minister made on the 18 March before the House of Commons, from my quick rereading of it this morning, I can for example, find no reference to this now famous 45 minutes." Susan Watts: "But the reference to 45 minutes was there in the Prime Minister's speech to the Commons on the day he published his famous weapons dossier." [BBC News, June 3, 2003]

 

Blair stands '100%' by weapons claims [BBC News, June 3, 2003]

 

Claim that Iraq was ready to use WMD defended [The Gaurdain, June 5, 2003]

 

Weapons of Mass Destruction. Tony Blair added fuel to the fire by claiming the Iraqi regime could deploy weapons of mass destruction within just 45 minutes. Now those words have come back to haunt... [NineMSN, June 8, 2003]

 


 

Exact words are pretty hard to live by.

 

Mike Brady

Episode 87, "Greg Gets Grounded"

January 19, 1973

 

Posted 3:45:59 PM   Send comment




Go to sleep dear, it's time to have sex

'Sexsomnia' occurs more often than we think, says an Ottawa doctor

 

A nightclub bouncer arrived in Dr. Paul Fedoroff's office after his wife complained he was constantly trying to have sex with her when she was asleep. ...

 

Thus began the Ottawa psychiatrist's research into a bizarre new disorder that he and other Canadian psychiatrists have dubbed "sexsomnia" -- people who engage in sexual behaviour while asleep. They believe the disorder should be recognized as a new "clinical entity" and warn it is far more prevalent than doctors suspect.

 

At first glance, this struck me as funny as anything to come out of the Weekly World News; but almost instantly, I was deeply disturbed by this thought: Doing strange things while sound asleep -- including "aimless wandering, carrying objects from one place to another for no apparent reason, furniture rearranging, inappropriate eating, urinating in closets, going outdoors," driving a car, and, yes, sexual activity (which can "run the gamut from moaning to rape-like behavior and violent masturbation that leaves bruising or soreness") -- is certainly unusual, but hardly anything "new."  (Even Shakespeare utilized the phenomenon; Lady MacBeth is sound asleep when she confesses to murder and repeatedly tries to wash the blood off her hands.)

 

So why call it a "bizarre new disorder"? The only thing "new" about it is the name.

 

What's bothersome about heralding this particular form of parasomnia as some groundbreaking "new" discovery is its potential implication in sexual-assault and abuse cases.

 

Fortunately, the potential for exploiting "sexsomnia" as a means of a legal defense is not lost on minds clearer than those of the "pioneering" shrinks, who acknowledge (but appear to dismiss):

 

...several cases of men who were charged with sexually assaulting their partners, or even their own children. All were "exculpated" after doctors found evidence of sexsomnia, and the study suggests cases of alleged sexual molestation should be investigated for evidence of the sleep sex disorder -- a prospect that alarms groups who work with sex assault victims.

 

They fear that if sexsomnia winds up in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, the "bible" doctors use to identify psychiatric illnesses, the new diagnosis could provide a convenient way for a sex offender to avoid a prison term.

 

"This thing will create just another loophole for men to get through," says Debbie King, executive director of the Kitchener-Waterloo Sexual Assault Support Centre. "They'll say: 'Oh, but I did it in my sleep.' " ...

 

"The key issue here is if a person is asleep, there's precedent in law the person is not responsible for their behaviour," says [Dr. Colin Shapiro, lead author of the report].

 

That precedent was set in Canada in 1987, when Kenneth Parks got up from his couch in Pickering, Ont., after falling asleep, got in his car, drove 23 kilometres to his mother-in-law's house, and then stabbed her and beat her to death with a tire iron. Mr. Parks said he was sleepwalking and was acquitted.

 

The 11 cases of sexsomnia Dr. Shapiro's team report in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry are not nearly so shocking, but disturbing nonetheless... While all of the men who were charged were cleared, Dr. [Paul] Fedoroff, co-director of the sexual behaviours clinic at the Royal Ottawa Hospital, acknowledges it's impossible to know for certain whether they were truly asleep.

 

But he has assessed men who have been charged with sexual assault who display no signs or symptoms of sexually deviant behaviour, but who in sleep studies show clear signs of a parasomnia, such as sleepwalking and talking, "which are all pretty tough to fake," Dr. Fedoroff says. Sexsomnia "simply raises the possibility of another explanation."

 

Go to sleep dear, it's time to have sex

Ottawa Citizen

June 22, 2003

 

Excuse me? Sleepwalking and talking "are all pretty tough to fake"? You're the one who's asleep, Doc; if Hillside Strangler Kenneth Bianchi could get away with fooling even one shrink with his shoddy multiple-personality act (which he did), and would-be Reagan assassin John Hinckley could manipulate his own psychiatrists to coach him through faking shizophrenia (which, fortunately, didn't hold up in court), you're going to have a hard time convincing me that it takes an Edward Norton to fake a sleep disorder. (We don't, after all, monitor the brainwaves of murderers in the act.)

 

Now, I'm not suggesting that automatism ("acting out" during sleep) is never a valid defense; it most certainly can be. I'm more concerned about the potential for its abuse. There have, for example, been certain landmark cases in which a defendant's acquittal of murder thanks to the defense of "homicidal sonambulism" (or "sleep murder") is positively astounding.

 

Take Steven Steinberg, a Scottsdale, Arizona, man who in 1981 stabbed his wife 26 times, then told police she had been killed by burglars. But the evidence was against Steinberg; he went to trial, and was acquitted on the defense that he had killed his wife in his sleep.  The verdict: Not guilty by reason of temporary insanity. Now, I'm no shrink, but if Steinberg had no memory of what he had done (at least, he said he didn't), what does his need to make up a "burglary" story say to you?

 

Just as disturbing is the inequity in which the somnabulism defense is deemed valid. In a remarkably similar 1999 case, Scott Falater, another Arizona man, stabbed his wife 44 times, dragged her body to the swimming pool, held her head underwater, and then hid his bloodied clothes, changed into pajamas, and bandaged an injured hand -- all while purportedly sound asleep.

 

The difference between the two cases is that, despite strong testimony supporting the sleepwalking defense (from the same trio of experts who helped acquit Kenneth Parks in 1992), Falater was convicted, and today is serving out a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

 

Steinberg's defense attorney, Robert Hirsch, told The Arizona Republic: "Times have changed. I don't think anybody could sell it (a sleepwalking defense) today. It's a process that I think America has gone through. People don't believe in any mental-state defenses. It didn't matter whether he was sleepwalking or not."

 

Sounds like a case of sour grapes from a lawyer who's just lost a case, but there's a seed of truth in Hirsch's assessment: Jurors are generally wary of any "mental-state defense," and inclined to assume that the defendant is faking it.

 

Nevertheless, the sonambulism defense has resulted in the acquittals of several other high-profile "sleepwalking" criminals since the Steinberg conviction:

 

  • In January, 2001, Richard Overton was cleared of two sexual-assault charges (although convicted of of child endangerment and child abuse) stemming from a 1998 incident in which he claims he suddenly awoke in the bed of a seven-year-old girl.

 

  • In May, 2001, 19-year-old Adam Kieczykowski entered dorm rooms at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, sexually assaulted ten female students, and stole items from some of them. He was acquitted on 18 different charges, "mark[ing] the first time in 156 years that the "sleepwalking defense" had been used successfully in Massachusetts."

 

  • In April, 2003, Marc Reider, 24, was acquitted of aggravated manslaughter in the 1999 head-on-crash death of a 39-year-old woman, because Reider was deemed to have been "sleep-driving."

 

As interesting as these cases may be, both "sleep crime" and its use as a legal defense are extremely rare; one estimate is that the sleepwalking defense has only "been raised in 20 to 30 murder trials worldwide."

 

But it is likely that, should Drs. Fedoroff and Shapiro reap the kind of accolades they seek with the announcement of their "new" sleep disorder, the "sleepwalking defense" will become more common.

 

And that's dangerous, for two reasons:

 

First, it does provide an all-too-easy out for accused sexual assailants, especially in the absence of evidence showing premeditation. Had Scott Falater not been spotted by a neighbor "dragging the body to the pool, putting on gloves, removing his bloodstained clothes and hiding them and the knife in his Volvo," he might have gotten away with the sleepwalking defense in the murder of his wife. Without similar evidence of premeditation and deliberation against an accused "sleep-rapist," the burden of proof that the defendant was not sleepwalking will fall on the victim of the assault. Perhaps that's legally appropriate, but should the onus fall on the victim to prove anything more than that the crime was committed, and that the defendant was the one who committed it?

 

Second, used indiscriminately, the sleepwalking defense will jeopardize legitimate cases in which parasomnia, and not the sufferer, is to blame. As mentioned earlier, it's tough enough trying to prove that a defendant was under the influence of any disorder, because jurors have grown immune to exaggerated claims of "The devil" -- or fill in the disorder of your choice here -- "made me do it." There's been a ongoing backlash against the American "society of victims," and that works very much against legitimate "mental-state" defenses.

 

Will "The sandman made me do it" become the new national joke? As Ayako Kado & Larry Fisher wrote in their oft-quoted paper, Sleepwalking – Nightmare for the courts:

 

The new dilemma is that various kinds of legal defense such as sleepwalking are firmly supported by medical evidence. The justice system is faced with a medically excusable defense that has the potential of being abused. In fact, Dr. Kryger writes, "The potential for sleep disorder to become the Twinkie defense of the 21st century is frightening"...

 

 

Related articles:

 

Sleepwalk to Murder

About.com

 

When the Brain Disrupts the Night

New York Times, January 7, 2003

 

Sleep Violence Wake-Up Call

The Forensic Echo, October 1, 1997

 

Can sleepwalking be a murder defense?

Lawrence Martin, M.D., 2002

 

Sleep Disorder Cases On The Rise / Can Sleep Woes Be a Defence in Court?

Straits Times Asia, October 22, 2002

 

Psycho Therapists / Great Psycho Excuses

Stuff, May, 2001

 

King v. Cogdon (1950): "[T]he defendant stabbed her daughter to death while she was dreaming that the Korean War was going on in her house and one of the soldiers was attacking her daughter. The psychiatric testimony suggested that her attack manifested a subconscious hostility toward her daughter..." (.PDF)

 


Comments


 

Posted Wed, 25 Jun 2003 01:28:41 GMT

LGBTBinat:

 

Yep I can just picture it now. All these parents are arrested on incest charges, only to be released several hours later for reasons of sleep incest? 

 

This is bloody rediculous.  While I believe it does happen to people, I do not believe that any person asleep can actually get in a car and drive around until they find someone to rape.  Rape them, then go back home and get into bed.

 

I was always under the impression that when you sleep walk, your eyes are actually still closed, or non responsive, so how can anyone do things like that if their eyes are non responsive or closed?

 

Excellent article as always, DT. 

 


 

Posted Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:13:01 GMT

doublethink:

 

Thanks, LGBT. :)

 

Ah, but their eyes can indeed be open, and the sleepwalker can seem very much awake. Not "quite himself," perhaps, but seemingly lucid. I never sleepwalked as a kid (that I know of), but I could hold a full conversation while I was sound asleep -- and with my eyes wide open, too -- and never remember a single detail, even when my mother or someone would repeat the whole conversation back to me. It subsided as I grew up, which is common; when you rule out drug use (Paxil for one, I understand, can bring it on) or other disorders (e.g., there seems to be a correlation with sleep apnea), sonambulism usually doesn't develop _in_ adulthood -- which is another reason I'm suspicious of adults who claim this just started happening out of the blue.

 

I've also known a number of "sleep-eaters" as well -- usually women on strict diets, who would go to bed, and reappear in the kitchen hours later, up to their elbows (almost) in peanut butter, or whatever else they'd been denying themselves during waking hours.

 

And although I know of no correlation between parasomnia and epilepsy, I'm struck by the similarities between some parasomniacal activities and what I once witnessed while sitting through a former roommate's grand mal epileptic seizure: He certainly wasn't himself; he wandered outside (I couldn't stop him -- he was big, and uncontrollable), peed in the neighbors' bushes (along with other inappropriate things), and ultimately couldn't remember a thing he'd done when it was all over.  He seemed genuinely shocked at his own behavior when I related his adventures the following day.

 

That's another possibility for sudden parasomnia in adulthood: brain injury -- which is sometimes (but not always) responsible for epilepsy. (My former roomie's epilepsy was brought on by a crushing blow to the skull a few years earlier.)

 

Anyway, it is all quite possible. But how do you weed out the legitimate cases from Oscar-worthy performances by very, very good actors?

 

Posted 2:04:18 PM   Send comment




Like Me? Please Link Me!
If you find Doublethink informative and useful, you would be doing me a great honor (and favor) if you would add a permanent link to Doublethink on your own blog or Web site. Just click inside the text box below, hit "Highlight All," then copy the text, and paste it into your Web page to give me a link.  Thank you very much!



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 doublethink.
Last update: 12/10/03; 11:07:50 PM.

June 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
May   Jul


POWERED BY:

POPULAR ENTRIES Conservative Babylon:
Sex and the Not-So-Single Republican

The Sandman Made Me Do It: Sexsomnia; Kenneth Parks
Spinning Private Lynch
Incubator Redux:
Top 40 Lies About Iraq

R.I.P. Gregory Peck
To Kill a Mockingbird Closing Argument

GET UPDATES

RSS/XML Radio Ampheta Subscribe with Bloglines



BLOGROLL RECOMMEND REVIEW WAGER



RATE ME
BESTWORST
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst



WEBRINGS

< ? blogs by women # >
< £ Salon Bloggers & >



Civilian casualties update
www.iraqbodycount.org

BLOGSNOB