|
So I’m blogging now, and I’m single. What’s the first thing you do before a first date? You google the guy, of course. This can make it harder to make up an impressive backstory for yourself, since the guy is going to be doing the same to you. But... what if some internet company could do it for you? For a fee, they could spontaneously create 10 to 20 blogs that just happen to mention you from time to time. Most of the posts would laud your intelligence and try to retell your latest anecdotes (of course, with the disclaimer, that you really had to hear it for yourself; your charisma is part of the telling.) A few blogs would recount how you broke someone’s heart, but that you are still friends. Others would allude, tastefully, to your sexual prowess. And just to add that touch of realism, a few blogs would claim that you’re a total jerk. Of course, the blogs would have to have all sorts of other entries about the events of the day, so that people would believe that they are real. Autopunditry. Ok, never mind. I’m out to go Cruise for Dean. 9:50:26 PM
|
|
9:14:19 PM
|
|
Master of low expectations. Glad to do his friends a favor. What more can you say to that? Something about soft bigotry? Oh, cooking the books... 8:42:03 PM
|
|
I did think about going back to my old journals from grad school and comparing my observations then with my sense of it now. My thought is that it would help me make more sense of what the experience was like, and to reflect on the stories I want to tell myself about my life and self as a scholar and historian. Unfortunately, those particular years seem to be stored at my parents' and thus inaccessible. It would be an interesting exercise, though, so maybe I'll try to visit my parents at home this summer (if I can afford it) and dig through the boxes in the garage.
Sometimes it’s nice to have things left at your parents. And not to look at them for a long, long, time.
(Also, hey, what’s with your permalinks?)
8:15:28 PM
|
|
I'm Bender baby, please insert liquor! (It's a song, mp3 download) 8:07:19 PM
|
|
God, how did I miss the sign-up for the vast left-wing conspiracy? Do I always just show up too late and have to sign up for the worst events? Seriously, is this what we have to do to get rid of Bush? Do we have any hard-working elves out there? Or are we just too damn nice? 7:53:18 PM
|
The other night, at the Dean meetup, I found myself saying that Bush was inviting terrorism by not seriously funding efforts at home to stop it. But could this really be true? It sounds like so much paranoid crap. Yet who would another attack benefit? It certainly seems that the Bush administration wants to bring about a state of perpetual war. The “Infinite Justice,” the first name of the campagin against Afganhasitin, which, as Zizek remarked, was a perfect example of Hegalian bad infinity, the projec that never ends, that is never supposed to end. My friends say that we won’t have another election; after all, we didn’t have one last time. They make me feel like a moderate. Now did I ask for that? 7:37:53 PM
|
|
Ok, anyone reading me right now, give me advice. Stay here and work/blog, or join the crowd of dancing boys across the street? 6:51:47 PM
|
|
It turns out that "let me talk to you about Howard Dean" is not really a great pickup line. But I'm working on it, and the bar is just across the street. I can see the boys waiting out there now, just hoping that I'll chat them up about Dean. 6:43:53 PM
|
|
Ok, ok, I know that the list of links on the left isn't really supposed to be my blogroll. But it's just easier that way for now. 6:36:38 PM
|
|
'Hairspray' Is an Early Winner at Tony Awards. "Hairspray" took hold of the 2003 Tony Awards Sunday, winning best book and score for a musical as well as the prize for costume design. By The Associated Press. [New York Times: Arts] 6:35:25 PM
|
|
Nice post from the Stop Bush in 04 blog: The result has been a poisoning of the public political discourse in the US; one that has yet to be understood by Democrats and others who shrug off wingnut radio and cable as harmless "entertainment" for the unwashed (i.e.: angry white male) demographic. More important than the ugly character assassination, lies and unchallenged assumptions of the genre is the fact that the substance, tone and daily message of the "shows" are driven not by the creative efforts and half-full-to-empty heads of the ideologues in front of the microphones, but rather by Karl Rove and the Republican National Committee. 3:15:21 PM
|
|
Those chemical weapon “mobile factories” found in Iraq -- it turns out, were actually balloon factories. Thank god we took those out of commission. 2:45:51 PM
|
|
2:36:30 PM
|
|
This can't happen here, can it? Otherwise, I want to know, how hard is it to get an EU passport? 2:24:58 PM
|
|
A Democratic Majority. Crucial filibuster talking points from Nathan Newman:In fact, if Senators had voting power proportionate to their state's populations, Democrats would have a significant majority in the Senate. Assuming that each Senator got one vote for every person in their state... [Matthew Yglesias]
2:07:53 PM
|
|
I'm very overjoyed to see that I've gotten a few inbound links. But this raises a problem: I had thought of the name of my blog as a working title. I ripped it off from the title of Christopher Logue's new book in his continuing transliteration of the Iliad. I'm a huge fan of War Music. (Why doesn't this guy publish more?) As I'm new to the ways of blogging, I'm not sure how acceptable it is to rip off a title like this. Logue got the title from a Revlon lipstick ad, and I think it's wonderfully evocative. But I suppose the longer I blog, the more disruptive it would be for me to change my blog's title. Update: Technocrati hates me or I don't understand what it counts as inbound links. Why does it list only one link still? 1:04:02 PM
|
|
I had no idea the push for gay marriage was not actually started by gay activists. According to this piece in the Boston Globe, Ironically, American lesbian and gay activists didn't choose marriage as an issue; marriage was thrust upon them. Although isolated same-sex couples sought to marry as far back as 1970, the organized lesbian- and gay-rights movement opposed pushing for marriage; some thought it too conventional a goal, while others thought it dangerously out of reach... Then, in May 1993, while the rest of the country was debating Don't Ask, Don't Tell, the Hawaii Supreme Court declared that denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples amounted to sex discrimination. In response, the religious right barnstormed the nation warning against ''gay marriage''-with an odd result. For both straight and gay folks, the phrase was transformed from an oxymoron into a real possibility. To the surprise of many longtime activists, the issue brought mainstream lesbians and gay men out in droves. Odd to think that two of the most visible gay rights issues of the past decade were not originally high priorities for gay and lesbian political activists. The whole Don’t Ask Don’t Tell fiasco was the result of an offhand, apparently unplanned comment from Bill Clinton; gay marriage was in part due to conservative activist trying to “protect” marriage from gays even before it had been brought up as a major issue. 12:38:57 PM
|
|
I really need to give more thought to my choice in shoes…
2:48:55 AM
|
|
This post from Frogs and Ravens really struck a nerve. I’ve been reading a lot of blogs of “postacademic” people, or people who are pre-postacademic. Frog writes, Well, no. First, most academic research of the type I enjoy takes place, well, in academe, so to be cast out of it reduces those opportunities (as far as I can tell, with my limited experience). But here's the catch-22: in order to be in academe, I need to be a member of the faculty, but my experiences have positioned me as a teaching-line faculty, not a researcher/post-doc! Research, yeah, that was the draw for me as well. God help me but I’ve been reading academic journals now, and am starting to buy books from university’s presses again. I keep wondering “to what end?” I’ve toyed with the idea of continuing some academic research projects, but it just seems so incongruous with the rest of my life now. Update: there seems to be some problem with froggy permalinks. 1:30:17 AM
|
|
His eyes like furnace doors ajar. 1:07:05 AM
|
|
Recovered my first blog entry: decided to repost it even though it's out of sequence now Facing the usual issues about starting blogs. First of all, of course, why bother? I recently read the article about scholar blogs in the Chronicle of Higher Education, and felt a lot of nostalgia. Just a few years back I was working on a PhD in comparative literature at Stanford. I got caught up in the high tech boom and now I work in software development. Hard for that not to happen, living right in the middle of the revolution, trying to get by on a student stipend. So though blogs I’ve been peeking into the life of grad students, to a very different Stanford, and feeling a kind of envy for the blog community that wasn’t there when I was a student. Even tales of picnics in the humanities center. Update: Those must have been really cool shoes... Update: I must see those shoes. Post a link or something. 1:00:39 AM
|
|
After I attended the Howard Dean meetup this week, I wrote about it in one of my first blog entries, which got obliterated when I tried to blog from home. The meetup happened at The Metro, a gay bar in the Castro. I had a great time and became a Howard Dean convert (at least for now), and signed up to volunteer for a ton of stuff – ok, can’t really remember what, since I had quite a few beers. (Hey, it was at a bar.) I did agree to do “outreach” activites, including, apparently, going to gay bars and talking to people about Dean. Well… a genuine excuse to up to strange guys without having to worry about an opening line. Perhaps I could organize some kind of “Cruising for Dean” committee. Just how far to you have to go get someone to promise to vote? Better not to speculate. I’m the sort of guy who can take one for the team from time to time. 12:42:08 AM
|
|
Judging from Technorati, that "Scholars Who Blog" article in The Chronicle of Higher Education is inspiring untold numbers of the academically-incline to start their first blog. I’d been thinking about blogging for a while, since I was spending far too much time reading blogs and I thought maybe I could cut down bu actually writing a blog. Writerly homopathy.
Or maybe it’s just that I suffer from the terrible All But Dissertation complex that makes me that if I blog because of an article about scholars who blog that I must somehow still be a scholar. Give me a moment, and I’ll think up a list of research interests. 12:41:19 AM
|
|
Friendster seems to be popping up in just about everyone's blog these days.On Gawker, predictably. We even learn there that Martha Stewart's broker is on Friendster and lists "gay bootie" as one of his interests. (Note to self: try to be more up-to-date about exact terminology people are using to categorize their interests these days. So many keyword serches can go astray.) Speaking of Martha, how can forget the classic exchange about here from Buffy. Xander: Anya has a theory. She thinks that Martha Stewart froze that guy. (Thanks to the incomparable Slayage for the quote.) 12:39:38 AM
|
|
An idea for email clients [bOing bOing] Fantastic idea! I think I might not be single right now if my email client had had one of those... 12:37:16 AM
|
|
Draw Us An Imaginary Line. I was just thinking. It's done. There were always episodes of Buffy The Vampire Slayer that I wanted to see, and now that it's all over, I know I never will. I thought I'd share a few of these ideas with you. In addition to this, I'll write in who I would have liked to see write these episodes. And who knows? Dark Horse publishes the comics. We may see these stories yet. [Articles and Interviews] I know how he feels. Daniel Erenberg has some great ideas for some Buffy stories. I hope he's able to push them through. 12:36:21 AM
|
|
I’ve been searching in vain for the quote from Slavoj Zizek about the “real aim” of the war on terror. He suggests that the ultimate aim is probably the transformation and control of the American public. Perhaps not all that exciting an insight when boiled down like that, but I seem to recall that there was something interesting about the architecture of his argument. Anyone know the quote I’m looking for? I’ll give you a prize, if only I could think of a good one to give… 12:34:47 AM
|
|
Doc Searls writes very approvingly of Howard Dean’s blog. Howard Dean takes notice of Doc Searls taking notice. And I hate to admit it, but I had no idea that Howard Dean blogged. Hey, I was only indoctrinated just last week. 12:16:22 AM
|
|
Ok, this is clearly addictive. What didn't that Scholar Blogging article warn me? 12:02:21 AM
|
| June 2003 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
| May Jul | ||||||
Last update: 7/14/2004; 9:36:45 PM .