| July 2004 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| 25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| Jun Aug |
Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
E-mail this blog's author, lost socks' politics & indie music blog: 
|
|
 |
Thursday, July 29, 2004 |
Well...the 9/11 commission report came out. That must be
that...Just because the thing was chaired by both Democrats and
Republicans: two groups who would have to work together to make sure
nothing too embarassing to either side would appear...I thought the
thing might be mildly incomplete...seeing as they didn't address any of
the ties the Huffman flight school had to drug trafficking or the DEA
being told to stay clear of what might be going on there...that might
be embarassing. They wouldn't want to interview anyone who knew Mohamed
Atta or anything (except the owner of the flight school who was
conveniently deported so as to avoid any real questioning...oh I mean
on an immigration violation)...just one footnote appears from Sibel Edmonds' testimony after she blew the whistle on FBI incompetence (for which they fired her despite earlier denials about that fact)...
Of course the right wingers will focus on the passage that
someone from Saddam's government supposedly offered Bin Laden safe
haven in Iraq (page 66)...let's just assume that it's true (as the
government never lies and Chalabi and his pals are all truth-tellers
not that this passage is footnoted of course)...THAT proves this war
was worth it. It doesn't matter how badly things go, it's great we
invaded. So let's just forget any possible cover up; we're too
brainwashed to believe it anyway. All left wing books are shit you see
and liberals are all the same and they don't read (REAL stuff like
Hannity or the Weekly Standard you see...anything liberal is by
definition bullshit and wrong and must be based on lies but all
conservative literature is of course true and never inaccurate or
misleading)...right wingers win the debate by not allowing one to take
place...it's better to shout and interrupt and rather than answer a
question just arrogantly yell "There you go...typical liberal thing to
say...you're an idiot! You don't know anything! You're so arrogant!"
It's a method that could perhaps be called the "O'Reilly Factor": just
don't allow your enemy to speak and if he questions the right wing view
call him a traitor and shut off his mic...
See...Kerry's a traitor for questioning the Vietnam war.
How dare peace protesters say "bring the troops home now"; it's much
much more supportive to leave them to die for reasons they haven't even
been told. If they don't believe in the war but still fight, that's
just them doing their duty as good soldiers: unless of course they're
John Kerry in which case he's a man of no principles for not refusing
to fight which if he had he'd be a traitor for you see...As always,
it's ok if a Republican does anything but if a Democrat does it it's
wrong. Republicans apparently operate on a higher moral ground where
the things they do must be for a greater good somehow because they're
Republicans even if what they do is identical to the thing a Democrat
does. Some call that hypocrisy; of course it's only hypocrisy when a
liberal were to use such moral relativism.
Right-wingers at best are just a mirror image of all they
despise about the left. They call the left closed-minded while being
closed-minded themselves. The only reason what they do is different is
because they KNOW THEY'RE RIGHT. How they know THAT nobody knows of
course but they just KNOW it. So liberals must suck. Disagree and the
right'll shout you down. They can't speak at a normal level or without
interrupting.
6:53:12 PM
|
|
|