| August 2004 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
| 8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
| 15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
| 22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
| 29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
| Jul Sep |
Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
E-mail this blog's author, lost socks' politics & indie music blog: 
|
|
 |
Tuesday, August 03, 2004 |
I'm not really sure how Vets can really support Bush
over Kerry. Bush lies to have wars and fights them on the cheap, with
mercenaries getting paid three times what soldiers do. Soldiers come
back with mysterious illnesses and the government then cuts military
benefits. How the fuck could ANY veteran support that? Oh...and Bush
and Cheney and most of their cabinet and advisors have never had to
fight in any wars because of their privileged connections!
Kerry DID fight even though he didn't think we should be
in Vietnam because his country called him to. When he saw how horrible
the war really was and how ill-considered it was, he had the conviction
to speak against it to end the killing on both sides. Somehow ending
needless soldier deaths is seen by many people as being unsupportive to
the troops. You'd think anyone could see the flaw in such logic:
especially actual troops. Wanting troops not to die just so rich people
can snag more oil is not treasonous. If people can't see that then I
guess all hope is lost.
6:30:55 PM
|
|
|