Thursday, February 12, 2004

Gay Sex Ruling may help Drug Policy Reform Now that I've got your attention... A post by Randy Barnett at the Volokh Conspiracy led me to his fascinating paper in the Cato Supreme Court Review: Justice Kennedy's Libertarian Revolution: Lawrence v. Texas (pdf) In it, Barnett posits that Lawrence v. Texas, as Justice Kennedy wrote the ruling, is not so much about privacy as it is about liberty. Although he never acknowledges it, Justice Kennedy is employing here what I have called a ''presumption of liberty'' that requires the government to justify its restriction on liberty, instead of requiring the citizen to establish that the liberty being exercised is somehow ''fundamental.'' In this way, once an action is deemed to be a proper exercise of liberty (as opposed to license), the burden shifts to the government.... - Continue reading Gay Sex Ruling may help Drug Policy Reform 9:42:54 PM | drug policy | Related  | permalink | comment [] Gay Sex Ruling may help Drug Policy Reform')" onmouseout="addthis_close()" onclick="return addthis_sendto()">

Go Chicago Sun Times! Powerful editorial yesterdayl: NOTHING CRIMINAL IN HEALING HERBS Should patients suffering from severe ailments -- AIDS, cancer, glaucoma -- have access to medical marijuana which, often alone among available medicines, can alleviate their suffering? Or should they be liable to arrest and prosecution like any other drug user? Few issues cut so wide a gulf between the federal government and the states.  The feds are anti-pot, period.  Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington have passed laws exempting the very ill, often terminally ill, from facing jail.  Now Illinois may join them.  A medical marijuana bill introduced into the General Assembly would exempt patients who have a doctor's prescription from prosecution.  It deserves full debate and then swift passage. Use of medical marijuana is only controversial to the feds -- responsible medical organizations such as the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of HIV Medicine, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Nurses Association support it, as do countless doctors.  "It is pointless and cruel," said one Chicago physician, "to threaten the sick with arrest and jail simply for trying to feel better." The sufferings of thousands of sick Illinois citizens demand that we cast off punitive and wrong-headed notions about marijuana and pass this bill without delay.  Kind of makes you wonder if this might actually be possible in Illinois. After all, Illinois legislature passed industrial hemp legislation 3 or 4 years ago, which only failed because then Governor Ryan vetoed it under pressure from then Drug Czar McCaffrey. And Illinois already has a medical marijuana law on the books since 1978 - it just never had the legal authority to be implemented. Will Illinois be the next medical marijuana state? 7:23:57 PM | drug policy | Related  | permalink | comment []