Saturday, May 22, 2004

Ultimate Frisbee Harshed Via Grassroots Buzz comes this horrible news from Drug War Chronicles. First, the drug testers came for the chess players, and we did nothing. Now the inexorable, totalitarian logic of drug prohibition has invaded the laid-back domain of competitive Frisbee, or, in this world leery of copyright infringement, flying discs. The sport's governing body, the World Flying Disc Federation (WFDF), voted May 2nd at its annual conference in Santa Cruz, California, to adopt the World Anti Doping Code, a drug testing regime that will subject Frisbee players to rigorous, Olympic-style drug testing. ...competitive Frisbee-tossers will be punished not only for using performance enhancing steroids, but also for having smoked marijuana within recent days. ... The United Kingdom Flying Disc Association News, warned its readers that even participation in student events sanctioned by the WFDF could get you drug tested. What can you do to stop the infringement on the inalienable rights of Americans to enjoy competitive frisbee with a nice mellow high? Contact the board members of the WFDF and let them know what you think. Buy one of these marvelous flying discs from the Drug WarRant shop and tell the world what you think. Update: The WFDF have clearly abandoned their roots in this decision. From Wikipedia: Teenagers from Columbia High School in Maplewood, N.J. invented the game of Ultimate initially as a joke in 1968. The school council president and newspaper editor Joel Silver proposed a school Frisbee team on a whim in the fall of 1967. That spring a group of students got together to play what Silver claimed to be the "ultimate sports experience" by adapting the game Frisbee Football in 1968. Silver, now a Hollywood film producer (48 Hours, Weird Science, Lethal Weapon, Die Hard, The Matrix), first played Frisbee Football at a camp in Mount Hermon, Massachusetts in the summer of 1967. The students were not very athletic, either nerds or druggies. While the rules governing movement and scoring of the disc have not changed, the early Columbia High games had no sidelines, no limit to team size, and allowed referees. Gentlemanly (and ladylike) behavior and gracefulness were held high. The first intercollegiate competition was held between Rutgers and Princeton on Nov. 6, 1972, the 103rd anniversary of the first intercollegiate football game, and at the same site on the Rutgers New Brunswick campus. The popularity of the game quickly spread, taking hold as a free-spirited alternative to traditional organized sports. Men would often play the game in skirts, and some would smoke marijuana on the sidelines. 12:41:28 PM |  drug policy | Links | permalink | comment []

What if they just say "yes?" One of the many problems with abstinence-only education is that it is all or nothing. It is sending an amateur across a tight-rope without a net, under the philosophy that if you give them a net it might encourage them to fall off. The drawback? If they fall without a net, they might die. Many overdose deaths could be prevented if people knew more – proper dosages, dangers of mixing drugs and alcohol, drug reactions – and were not afraid to get help. But abstinence education specifically rejects this information, thereby condemning to death some children who fall off the rope. Drug warriors who push for abstinence-only are saying “We would rather have some children die than tell them the truth.” (They will say that they are preventing deaths by keeping kids from using drugs, but studies show that kids will experiment anyway.) Marsha Rosenbaum is probably the best OpEd columnist out there writing about kids and drugs (here are some past columns), and she knows her stuff well -- she directs the Safety First drug education project of the Drug Policy Alliance in San Francisco. Her most recent piece is a response to the death of a 14-year-old Belmont, CA girl who had taken ecstasy (among other things) with her friends, titled "Fallback Strategy for Teens Who Say Yes to Drugs." ... Especially disturbing is that, in the opinion of San Mateo County coroner Robert Foucrault, Irma Perez's life could have been saved with professional intervention.  According to the paramedic's report, Perez had taken an excessive dose - three "Valentine ecstasy" pills - and possibly alcohol and/or other drugs as well.  While her two friends suffered no ill effects, Perez had an extremely rare reaction.  She experienced what emergency physician Dr.  Karl Sporer calls "serotonin syndrome": rapid heart rate, high blood pressure, high fever and agitation.  Because adverse reactions are so rare with ecstasy, what caused Perez's idiosyncratic response? Did the pills contain adulterants? Did Perez have a pre-existing condition that made her especially vulnerable, such as a cardiac arrhythmia? Was she dehydrated or did she drink too much water, causing dramatic drops in sodium levels? We don't know the answers to these questions yet, but it is hoped the coroner will issue his report soon and make it public.  As a drug educator, I agree with Belmont-Redwood Shores Superintendent John McIntosh that in this "teachable moment" we must provide information to both parents and teenagers.  At this critical juncture we need to be very careful about what we say so we can win back the confidence of young people.  After more than two decades of exaggerations about drugs in general, and a recent scandal leading to the retraction of "brain damage" claims about ecstasy, adults have lost a great deal of credibility with teens. ... Missing from our educational efforts is a fallback strategy of harm reduction for those teens who, like Perez and her friends, say "yes" despite our efforts.  In addition to providing sound information about alcohol and other drugs, young people should learn to recognize signs of distress and know that they can and must get help.  This was not what happened in Perez's case.  For five hours her friends tried on their own to help, using makeshift methods, such as giving her a bath.  Perez finally lapsed into the coma from which she never recovered. ...  Many in law enforcement, such as Commander Trisha Sanchez of the San Mateo County Narcotics Task Force, agree that the message we send our teens should be clear.  The use of alcohol and other drugs is a poor choice, but if you do experiment and there is a problem, you will not be punished by calling for help.  "You will not be punished by calling for help." That should be the number one message taught in drug education programs, followed by sound information about alcohol and other drugs. Remember, if all you tell thim is "just say no," then you're sending them out there without a net when they say "yes." 10:05:59 AM |  drug policy | Links | permalink | comment []

Sheriff Bill Masters I've mentioned Bill Masters before. He's author of Drug War Addiction: Notes from the Front Lines of America's #1 Policy Disaster. Now, he has a new book out: "The New Prohibition: Voices of Dissent Challenge the Drug War. (which is available as a premium, by the way, for donating to Stop The Drug War.org) Walter in Denver has an extensive post about the amazing Bill Masters, based on the excellent Westword profile. But Masters insists that the drug war is primarily focused on locking up American citizens -- and, in the process, squandering resources and manpower that could be better devoted to homeland-security interests. "A quarter of the FBI case filings in the year before 9/11 were drug cases," he says. "Who was looking after the terrorists? Nobody. We have 10,000 DEA agents. Is it more important to prevent the next terrorist attack or to bust Cheech for having a bong? In the year before 9/11, we arrested almost 750,000 people for possession of marijuana -- and one foreign terrorist." He shakes his head in disgust. "You'd think real conservatives would be looking at what works, what's the best result you can get for the money," he says. 10:01:30 AM |  drug policy | Links | permalink | comment []

Contrarianism gains converts My recent post If I were Contrarian-King of the United States is the feature article in this week's Drug Sense Weekly newsletter (always a great re-cap of the week). I've gotten some great contrarian additions in the comments of that post. If you have more, add them there. I'll collect them all for an archived article version. 9:43:29 AM |  drug policy | Links | permalink | comment []