|
|
|
Drug WarRant
 |
Saturday, April 3, 2004 |
My kind of testimony
Marijuana Policy Project's Rob Kampia testified Thursday before the farce that is the U.S. Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources, chaired by drug warrior Mark Souder.
"Testified" is one term for what he did. "Tore them a new one" would perhaps be more accurate.
The topic was "Marijuana and Medicine: The Need for a Science-
Based Approach." Kampia made it clear that he and MPP were in favor of a Science-based approach, and that they were probably the only ones in the room who were.
He slammed the government's past tendency to ignore scientific evidence on medical marijuana and propagate myths and lies. He completely tore apart Andrea Barthwell's OpEd in the Chicago tribune, exposing her outright falsehoods.
He finished with:
This hearing is a witch hunt, not a quest for knowledge.
The goal of this subcommittee, under its current leadership, is not to adopt a true scientific approach to the subject of marijuana. If that were the case, the authors of the Institute of Medicine report and physicians and patients from the eight medical marijuana states would have been invited. Or a representative from the American Nurses Association. Or a representative from the American Public Health Association.
No, the clear goal of the current chairman is to expend federal funds in a fruitless quest to find evidence that supports his own baseless belief....
In sum, the Marijuana Policy Project strongly supports a science-based approach to medical marijuana. We hope that Chairman Souder eventually abandons his reliance on myths and lies, stops the federal witch hunt for medical marijuana patients and doctors, and embraces an approach that is based on science.
Delightful! Read (or watch) his entire testimony here.
2:35:15 PM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
Can our government be any more stupid?
Yes. From the Daily Telegraph:
The Bush administration took the highly unusual step of sending a senior official to Congress to chastise Britain, its closest ally in the war on terrorism, for dragging its feet in the fight against drugs.
Robert Charles, the assistant secretary of state for international narcotics and law enforcement, said Britain was being too squeamish about eradicating poppy fields before Afghan farmers had found an alternative source of crops and income.
"Our point of disagreement, and I put it very directly," said Mr Charles, "is that we believe that if there is a heroin poppy that needs to be eradicated, we shouldn't be picking and choosing, we shouldn't be delaying, waiting for an alternative revenue stream to become available."
He said: "Our priority should not be some kind of misplaced sympathy for someone who will have to do a little bit more work [to grow other, less-lucrative crops, such as wheat or barley]."
First of all, the government completely fails to understand the economics of the drug trade in Afghanistan, and we're having plenty of trouble of our own figuring out how to deal with the Afghans (see this article from LastOneSpeaks to get a picture of it.)
Then the absolute condescension by Charles in that last paragraph is downright offensive. The notion that the Afghans are only growing opium because they're too lazy to grow a real crop is stupid. Oh, and pissing off our ally? Yeah, that's gotta help.
1:49:06 PM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, April 1, 2004 |
Jennings' piece on Ecstasy a must-see
This piece was astonishing - a factual investigative report on ecstasy that shows how the government has been its own worst enemy. It showed all the good things about ecstasy and all the stuff we don't know (including potential dangers) and for which need more studies. It slammed the bad science involved, and also slammed the government for squandering all credibility by lying and exaggerating the problems.
A couple of startling moments where the program showed dramatically how making the drug illegal caused most of the problems that exist.
It you missed it, you can purchase a video of the program for $29.95 at the ABC store.
I think I may get a copy just to have in my library.
Update: Chris puts it best: "This is the strongest major-network condemnation of federal drug policy that I've ever seen."
10:05:38 PM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
President Bush Legalizes Marijuana in America
Historic Executive Order to Take Effect on April 20
April 1, 2004
Washington, DC: In a move that astonished conservatives and liberals
alike, President George W. Bush issued a surprise executive order today
legalizing the possession and sale of marijuana in the United States. The
order will take effect on April 20, long considered marijuana smokers'
independence day.
When asked about the sudden change of heart, President Bush explained;
"The other night Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell and I were in the war room
mulling over how to sway public opinion on the war in Iraq. We were stuck
in the same rut of tired old ideas and were in desperate need of creative
new ways of thinking. That's when Karl Rove pulled out a fatty." While
Bush admitted that it had been 30 years since his last toke, he figured,
"Why not. I am the President. What can they do, arrest me?"
President Bush made the announcement in his weekly radio address, saying
that it's "high time" we reformed our marijuana policies. "The reality
is," said the President, "marijuana is far less dangerous than alcohol or
tobacco and far too many people have had their lives ruined after being
arrested for nothing more than a doobie. Besides, my Pink Floyd records
haven't sounded this good since my days at Yale. Boy, those were some
good times."
Newly appointed Drug Czar Keith Stroup hailed the move as a great step
forward for America. "For 33 years NORML has worked to show that
marijuana smokers are no different than the average American. Thankfully
we finally have a president who has come to his senses on this issue,
albeit with a little help from his old friend Mary Jane." Stroup went on
to announce that his first move as Drug Czar will be to free all marijuana
smokers currently incarcerated, and to form a commission to study
reparations for all former marijuana prisoners. He also outlined the
newest ONDCP ad campaign, "Don't Bogart That Joint," featuring the newly
reunited Cheech and Chong. The campaign is designated to promote civility
and sharing amongst cannabis consumers.
Of course, not everyone was thrilled about the President's sudden change
of heart. Sue Rusche, over-protective soccer mom and founder of National
Families in Action, lashed out at the president from behind her bottle of
valium saying that the President's decision would send the wrong message
to children. Former Drug Czar Bill Bennett, when questioned about the
executive order outside of the Sands Casino in Las Vegas, could only
mutter, "I need a cigarette."
Meanwhile, Rep. Mark Souder (R-IN), author of the Higher Education Act
Drug Provision that has denied federal financial aid to over 140,000
students with drug convictions, nearly broke into tears upon hearing the
announcement. "My children are near college age and now they may never
receive a college education," stated Souder in an impromptu press
conference with former ONDCP Director John Walters. "There is no way I
will risk sending my kids to school with a bunch of pot smoking hippies."
John Walters, looking overly mellow for a man having just lost his job,
simply passed a blunt and replied, "Just hit this Mark. You need to
loosen up. You're starting to harsh my buzz."
Meanwhile marijuana smokers nationwide took to the streets to celebrate
their newfound freedom. A haze of sweet smelling sativa smoke wafted over
the nation's capitol as Americans of all walks of life flooded Washington,
DC for the first ever legal smoke-in. The gathering featured over a
million people, without a single arrest. "This is the best day of my
life," said local hot dog vendor Joe Giamatti, "I ran out of hot dogs two
hours ago and now they're buying up all the buns. Thank you President
Bush!"
In the wake of Bush's executive order, NORML's Board of Directors issued a
statement announcing that the organization will gladly go out of business
effective April 20. "It took 33 years," said the statement "but our work
here is finally done. Our staff can finally go home and get baked in
peace."
Via NORML. For more information, have a happy April Fools Day.
9:25:20 AM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
Anatomy of a settlement
A very interesting article in the Morning Call about the Hirko settlement. It could have been a $30 million or even a $100 million award (which would have really damaged the city). This article shows how the two sides worked together and is a very interesting look behind the scenes.
Callahan told Hirko family lawyer John Karoly Jr. that the city was willing to make police reforms part of the settlement, that the city had gotten the message that the police force needed reforms....
It was something Karoly and his clients had been waiting to hear for seven years -- that city officials recognized police had erred during the disastrous raid.
Without that new direction in the settlement talks-- and without the willingness of Karoly's side to compromise financially -- the case might not have been settled last week.
The Morning Call has been outstanding in its coverage of the Hirko case. Here's the archive of their articles.
[Thanks again to Patrick Dickinson!]
9:21:18 AM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
TV Alert: Primetime Thursday: Peter Jennings Reporting: Ecstasy Rising
Tonight, Thursday, April 1, 2004 at 10 pm Eastern, 9 pm Central.
"Government is best when government is most honest, especially for the younger generation, which is more susceptible to trying drugs," says ABC's "World News Tonight" veteran anchor. "If ( young people ) can't rely on the government for good and honest information, then government has lost something enormously valuable, which is people's belief in the government's credibility." ...
"This was an opportunity for us to look at whether or not the government isn't its own worst enemy in trying to control illegal drugs," Jennings says.
And is it?
"Yes," Jennings replies. "I believe a lot of people in government understood the science ( about Ecstasy's negative side effects ) was not good. But not until real attention was drawn to it did they take down their Web site on Ecstasy." ...
Jennings admits working on the special was educational for him.
"I had no idea Ecstasy was as old as it is," he says. "I had no idea that it had been introduced in California through psychotherapy, and I had no idea how effective it seemed to have been for some psychotherapists. I remember one psychologist telling us that one session with a patient on Ecstasy was equal to four years ( of treatment ) with a similar patient."
Although practically everyone has heard of Ecstasy, which was made illegal in 1985, most people aren't familiar with the drug's origins. "Ecstasy Rising" serves as a fascinating history lesson.
12:52:59 AM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, March 31, 2004 |
Affidavit for a Search Warrant
The Smoking Gun has the actual affidavit for the warrant to search the Dagy family residence based on their electrical usage (see my earlier story).
It's an amusing read, particularly when you already know how wrong they were.
[Thanks to Patrick]
8:47:14 PM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
You have the right to remain... dead
Michael Newby, a 19-year-old black teenager, was fatally shot 3 times in the back by a white officer.
A grand jury has indicted the officer, McKenzie Mattingly, on murder and wanton endangerment charges.
Now, three months after the shooting, Louisville police have charged the dead teenager with drug and weapons offences.
Now I don't know all the facts in this case (and some we won't know), but their claim that it was only to meet federal regulations seems a bit strange.
I wonder if they went to his grave and read him his rights.
[Thanks to Jeff Sanderson for the tip.]
7:05:22 PM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
The Federal Medical Marijuana program
With all the demonization of medical marijuana by the federal government, it's important to remember now and then that the feds have been growing marijuana, rolling and packaging marijuana cigarettes, and supplying canisters of this medical marijuana to patients since the mid-1970s.
It was part of the "compassionate use" program. Unfortunately it's been discontinued so that no new patients are accepted, but they continue supplying the original handful until they die (something the feds likely hope happens soon).
Nikkie at Vice Squad has the info on one of these patients who won the right to fly on airlines with his marijuana.
The NIDA website contains some interesting information about the issues related to their growing methods at the University of Mississippi.
Of course, just like in Canada, the feds have not shown an ability to grow or roll very good pot - even for medical purposes.
Additionally, the government has a monopoly on marijuana for research purposes. If you want to do a study on marijuana, not only do you have to go through years of jumping through hoops and a horrific approval process (one that's much easier if you're a drug company or someone trying to find negative effects of marijuana), but you have to use the crap they grow at the University of Mississippi (forget using a high-quality, high-potency marijuana that might deliver better results with less smoking.
1:02:09 AM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
|
Monday, March 29, 2004 |
Cost of a pound of pot
 Vietnam Veteran Douglas Lamar Gray had a roofing business in Moulton, a wife and a son. In 1989, he bought $900 worth of marijuana in a motel room..
Until then, the longest Gray had been locked up was a few months for a burglary in his teens, then two more burglaries in his early 20s....
A police informant with a criminal record had lured Gray to the motel. Gray bought the marijuana...
Gray was sentenced to life in prison without parole.
That no one was injured during his crimes doesn't matter. Gray, 49, will die behind bars.
Before the drug bust, he had not been arrested in 14 years.
"Made real good money, owned my own house, my own land," he said. "Watched my little boy grow up, then they set me up and sold me a pound of pot."
His wife divorced him. His son, now 16, is in trouble with the law.
"He said he was going to get into trouble and come to prison so he could be with me," Gray said.
The state has spent $150,000 to keep Gray locked up. So far.
How much more the state spends depends on how long Gray lives.
8:17:20 PM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, March 28, 2004 |
Don't forget to turn out the lights.
Via Three Sheets to the Wind comes one of those amusing human interest stories that's also a whole lot more:
CARLSBAD, Calif. - When police noticed Dina Dagy's family was spending $250 to $300 a month on electricity, they suspected a marijuana farm was flourishing under high-intensity lights inside their suburban home.
What they found when they showed up with a drug-sniffing dog and a search warrant was a wife and mother who does several loads of laundry a day, keeps a dishwashing machine going, has three electricity-guzzling computers and three kids who can't remember to turn the lights out when they leave a room.
"It's hard to believe a high utility bill would be enough to issue a state warrant," said Dagy, who is demanding the Police Department issue a written apology.
Now the police also did apparently send "a police dog to the neighborhood, and it reacted as though it had smelled drugs" - a pretty vague indication (I guess you better be careful if your neighborhood smells of drugs). And then the kicker -- the final point that justified the warrant:
They also noticed the family had put its trash out that morning, something police say drug growers often do to hide the evidence. In the Dagys' case, however, it was trash day.
Ah, yes. They put out their trash. They must be criminals.
Over and over again, you see evidence of how the drug war has perverted the system and infringed on individual rights. If it wasn't for prohibition, none of this would be an issue.
Back to the story... Notice the use of the bland word "noticed." They "noticed" the trash had been put out (Probably after hours of watching the house.)
And the one I love -- they "noticed" Dagy's family was spending $250-300 a month on electricity. How do you "notice" something like that if you're the police? It means, of course, that the police were examining citizens' utility bills.
This gets pretty creepy. I suddenly have images of law enforcement analyzing my everday activities to see if I "put my trash out". "Look, he parked his car in the garage - just like what a drug dealer would do." "His living room light is on at 2 am - he must be smoking pot." "OK, get the search warrant. We just checked his cable bill and he ordered Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and 2001: A Space Odyssey"
Or am I just being paranoid?
Another house with a high electric bill that should be investigated.
4:09:55 PM | drug policy | Links | permalink |
|
|
|
|
|
|
