|
|
|
Drug WarRant
 |
Saturday, March 29, 2008 |
Those infallible drug-sniffing dogs
A couple of weeks ago, I mentioned a questionable plan in Bartonville, Illinois to be "proactive" in drug enforcement, and while details were lacking, it seemed suspiciously like an unconstitutional fishing expedition on the part of police (perhaps testing the extremes of the horrible Supreme Court decision in Illinois v. Caballes).
It appears, based on this report from Peoria Pundit, that my suspicions were well-founded (and that their dog is like every other drug-sniffing dog -- mostly worthless).
But there's the funny part: Their dog is "busted." As in "broken." As in "doesn't work." A source tells me of one person who was stopped in one of these "proactive" enforcement events. Police took him out of his car and made him stand there while the drug-sniffing dog circled the car, sniffing away. The dog found nothing, which is understandable, since the driver didn't have ANY drugs in the car.
But he DID have a small bag of weed in his pants.
Certainly, the driver thought, this dog is eventually going to hit on the grass in his pocket. Nope. Nothing. Not even after the dog took a good long sniff.
2:55:45 PM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
|
Friday, March 28, 2008 |
|
Thursday, March 27, 2008 |
Operation overkill or I love a parade
Police in London on their way to a drug raid where they take down an internet cafe, a butcher and a greengrocer.
If I saw this, I'd be looking for the big cartoon balloon animals, clowns and marching bands to follow.
11:37:05 PM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
Successful medical necessity defense for marijuana possession in Texas
Either that, or it was jury nullification -- somewhat the same thing in this case.
Coverage at Grits, Hit and Run, and MPP.
6:59:08 PM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
Oh look! Guinea Pig bedding!
Earlier this month, I thoroughly ridiculed, some upcoming Reefer Madness-style sensationalism from Nicky Taylor and the BBC.
Well, it's happened. Nicky Taylor discovered first-hand the horrifying effects of smoking marijuana and is sharing her terrifying ordeal with the rest of the world...
"I felt absolutely terrified," recalls Nicky, a divorced mother-of-three, thinking back to her first experience just over a month ago.
"Paranoia set in, and I felt as if I was having a panic attack. At one point, I was simply too frightened to get out of my chair.
"I had a feeling the drug had unlocked some sort of paranoia in my head that would never go away again - I suddenly felt everyone hated me. Without doubt, that was one of the worst moments of my life."
The Daily Mail was thrilled to be able to help disseminate the information:
While some will question Nicky's wisdom in committing herself to such an experiment when she is a mother of three young children, there is little doubt that her experiences are both enlightening and cautionary to anyone who might think cannabis is harmless.
I guess the British media and Nicky Taylor were providing a public service to inform the millions of people who had smoked cannabis that their first-hand experiences were, in fact, false.
So I called my friend George, who lives in a London suburb, and asked him about the article and the BBC piece.
"Bloody hell!" he exclaimed. "I've often had a bit of skunk on the weekend with friends or when going to an Arsenal match, and I thought I was enjoying it. But apparently I've been terrified. Who knew?"
Who knew, indeed? I really don't understand the British press. I had even thought the BBC had some kind of cred, but if they're showing "documentaries" like this, apparently they're like some kind of National Enquirer (I already knew that about the Daily Mail).
Are their readers/viewers really that stupid that they accept this nonsense? Cannabis is so widely used that Reefer Madness is just not effective as propaganda anymore.
The Daily Mail piece really gets hilariously surreal at one point, when Nicky Taylor apparently fails to realize that certain effects of cannabis are features and that anyone with 2 more brain cells than moron knows you don't conduct an interview while stoned (particularly if you can't handle it)
"At one point, I went to interview the man who runs Amsterdam's hemp museum after smoking cannabis," says Nicky. "I wanted to appear professional - as any reporter from the BBC would. But this proved to be next to impossible. I was giggly and could hardly keep my mind on what he was saying.
"Embarrassingly, my attention suddenly wandered to a pile of guinea pig bedding which was sitting in the corner of his office, clearly intended for someone's pet.
"I rushed over to it and kept picking it up. I felt as if I'd just discovered the Holy Grail, but the poor man clearly thought I was incredibly odd. He was obviously uncomfortable in my presence, and I was clearly unable to be professional while on the drug."
To find out how much her concentration had been compromised, Nicky set herself the task of assembling a flat pack cabinet, first free from and then under the influence of cannabis.
Without having smoked the drug, she found the job straightforward. While stoned however, it was a different matter.
"I took only two puffs of cannabis, but was totally hopeless when it came to assembling the cabinet," she says. I felt so spaced out that I ended up passing out on the sofa with the cabinet still in bits around me. The drug totally destroyed my ability to think."
Over the course of the four-week investigation, this "mental oblivion", as Nicky describes it, was to become a familiar feeling.
Clearly we need to arrest marijuana smokers. They might become... giggly.
The whole piece is such nonsense as to be not worthy of debunking... But it is so much fun to ridicule.
9:58:10 AM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
ONDCP's Scott Burns has very tiny joints
Scott Morgan takes it to the drug czar's office with A False and Embarrassing Press Release from the Deputy Drug Czar
Deputy Drug Czar Scott Burns tries to go after the decriminalization bill in New Hampshire and ends up getting it wrong big time, so much so that apparently lawmakers are passing it around for laughs.
Burns claims that the law would decriminalize "the manufacturing, possession, and/or distribution of 1.25 ounces or -- over 90 marijuana joints." The law would, in fact, only decriminalize possession of 0.25 ounces. And even in Burns' deluded world, he'd still have to be rolling 2.5 joints per gram (and under the actual law, he'd have to be rolling 13 joints per gram). Now it's true that people do have different sized joints, but generally one gram is average.
Be sure to read Scott Morgan's full response, but here is the press release:
Press Release
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
STATEMENT FROM DEPUTY "DRUG CZAR"
SCOTT M. BURNS ON MARIJUANA
DECRIMINALIZATION EFFORTS IN
NEW HAMPSHIRE
(Washington, D.C.) -- Today, Scott M. Burns, Deputy Director for the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), made the following statement regarding marijuana decriminalization legislation, which is currently being debated in New Hampshire.
"Decriminalizing the illegal and highly addictive drug -- marijuana -- sends the wrong message to New Hampshire's youth, students, parents, public health officials, and the law-enforcement community.
"The supporters of decriminalizing marijuana are fooling themselves if they believe the manufacturing, possession, and/or distribution of 1.25 ounces or -- over 90 marijuana joints -- is good public policy.
"Decriminalizing marijuana -- the drug which sends the most of America's youth into substance abuse treatment and recovery -- is a dangerous first step towards complete drug legalization. In fact, marijuana sends the highest percentage of New Hampshire residents into drug treatment than any other illicit drug.
"The last thing New Hampshire need is more drugs, drug users, and drug dealers on their streets and communities -- further straining limited law enforcement manpower and resources.
I strongly urge responsible leaders in New Hampshire to stop any effort to decriminalize or legalize the highly addictive drug marijuana."
To learn more about the dangers of marijuana use, please visit:
http://www.ondcp.gov/drugfact/marijuana
8:33:45 AM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 |
|
Monday, March 24, 2008 |
Glorifying the Drug War for Entertainment and Profit
The Huffington Post has given some of it space to an infomercial by DEA flack Mary Irene Cooper, who gushes about Al Roker's new DEA unreality series on Spike TV: Inside The Real Drug War
Cooper who makes her living propagandizing the drug war and getting excited about the DEA Museum, is practically wetting her pants over the sheer adrenaline rush from the anticipated violence.
Never before has DEA let cameras this deep into the drug trade. Viewers live the DEA creed to expect the unexpected. As much as we prepare, plan, and train, we can't control everything on a drug raid or undercover deal. All the planning could change the minute the reality of the street hits. You never know what's on the other side of the door until you go through it, and as we say, anytime dope and money come together, there's a good chance of violence.
Viewers will go undercover with us. You'll feel your heart beating faster as we approach the darkened car on a dimly lit street. You'll feel on edge as we set up undercover operations with unpredictable, violent drug dealers. You'll feel the adrenaline rush as we crash through the door of stash houses occupied by armed felons.
Ooh, that does sound exciting! Gee, you think we'll get to see a DEA agent waste a 14-year-old girl? Wouldn't that be great!!!!!
I suddenly have a metallic taste in my mouth.
1...2...3...4...5...6...7...8...9...10
OK. Let's tell it like it is. This show is bad drug war porn, and Mary Irene Cooper is a whore -- selling her drug war to the masses -- using the "car-wreck" reflex to suck people in and take advantage of their baser instincts -- all in order to spackle the image of what may be the most destructive agency in the history of the United States.
My apologies to whores.
6:24:14 PM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
Stuff keeps happening
 Reports that a recent military raid by Colombia into Ecuador may have been assisted by the United States Manta air base in Ecuador that is only supposed to be used for counter drug operations.
Are federal agents intimidating patients in order to go after the Pain Relief Network?
Via Crooks and Liars, Arthur Silber says: The United States: Now A Private and Exclusive Country Club, Run by Monsters
Barney Frank plans to file a bill to legalize small amounts of marijuana. This is interesting, not in itself, but in what the action represents, as Frank himself says, that it's "time for the politicians in this one to catch up to the public."
A good reminder: For the thousandth time, you don't need to consent to searches nor be interviewed by the cops.
If you're thinking of going to Dubai, don't. There are a number of places way down at the bottom of my list for vacation destinations, including Dubai, Thailand, Indonesia, Iran, and Leroy, Illinois (it's just not that interesting). Higher on my list are Amsterdam, Alaska, and the Czech Republic (again).
12:08:44 AM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, March 23, 2008 |
Calling B.S. on the Idea of 'Marijuana Addiction'
at Alternet
Earlier this month, the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse announced plans to spend $4 million to establish the nation's first-ever "Center on Cannabis Addiction," which will be based in La Jolla, Calif. The goal of the center, according to NIDA's press release, is to "develop novel approaches to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of marijuana addiction."
Not familiar with the notion of "marijuana addiction"? You're not alone. In fact, aside from the handful of researchers who have discovered that there are gobs of federal grant money to be had hunting for the government's latest pot boogeyman, there's little consensus that such a syndrome is clinically relevant -- if it even exists at all. [...]
Of those in treatment, some 36 percent had not even used marijuana in the 30 days prior to their admission. These are the "addicts"?
7:19:05 PM | drug policy | Related | permalink |
|
|
|
|
|
|
