Drug WarRant by Pete Guither Heading Image

Treatment Statistics or, The Drug Czar is Lying to You

The Drug Czar and other drug warriors keep talking about the vast numbers of marijuana users in treatment, how the potency of pot is adding to the treatment numbers and how the high levels of treatment show that marijuana is not safe.

I've often debunked that notion here, but I thought I'd take a look at the drug warriors' own statistics and show them to you.

You can run your own charts off the raw government data here if you know how to do it. It's available through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive in conjunction with SAMHSA.

I've done it below for you. Now the Drug Czar would run the numbers and eliminate alcohol from treatment statistics to increase the percentage of marijuana, or would focus on age ranges that would support his arguments better. I'm looking here at the overall data (let me know if there's a particular age range you'd like me to run if you don't know how).

In the first chart below, we're looking at a cross-reference of primary substance "problem" and referral source.

When you take a look at the various forms of referral for marijuana (percentages are the 2nd bold number in each cell in the marijuana row) you immediately see:

  • 58.1% of all marijuana referrals to treatment were from the criminal justice system
  • Only 16.6% of marijuana referrals to treatment were from individuals (that includes parents), which is where you would expect a large figure if, in fact, marijuana addiction (particularly in youths) was a real problem

That clearly shows that treatment numbers are a more a function of referral rather than any actual problems with marijuana use.

Now, take a look at the other numbers (how marijuana compares to other drugs by referral) and you see

  • When it comes to individual referrals (individuals and parents, etc.), 38.9% are for alcohol and only 7.3% for marijuana. That gives you an idea of the actual concern people have regarding the use/abuse of substances despite the propaganda and legal status.
  • More strangely, when it comes to schools, 57.9% of school referrals are for marijuana, while only 27.1% are for alcohol. Given the fact that alcohol is more dangerous and causes more actual problems, one of two things can be inferred:
    1. Alcohol regulation works so much better than marijuana prohibition, that more students are getting pot than alcohol
    2. Schools are ignoring alcohol problems and focusing on busting marijuana use.

[more below the chart]

SDA 1.3: Tables

Treatment Episode Data Set, 2002

Data run Aug 03, 2004 (Tue 07:09 PM EDT)
Variables
Role Name Label Range MD Dataset
Row SUB1 PRIMARY SUBSTANCE PROBLEM CODE 1-20 -9 1
Column PSOURCE PRINCIPAL SOURCE OF REFERRAL 1-7 -9 1
Frequency Distribution
Cells contain:
-Column percent
-Row percent
-N of cases
PSOURCE
1
INDIVIDUAL (INCLUDES SELF-REFERRAL)
2
ALCOHOL/ DRUG ABUSE CARE PROVIDER
3
OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDER
4
SCHOOL (EDUCATIONAL)
5
EMPLOYER/ EAP
6
OTHER COMMUNITY REFERRAL
7
COURT/ CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERRAL/ DUI/DWI
ROW
TOTAL
SUB1 1: NONE 1.1
39.8
6,906
.3
3.6
626
1.0
7.0
1,215
6.2
7.1
1,226
.7
.6
108
.9
8.8
1,520
.9
33.1
5,743
1.0
100.0
17,344
2: ALCOHOL 38.9
31.2
243,702
49.1
12.1
94,905
52.0
8.0
62,474
27.1
.7
5,343
51.6
1.1
8,257
44.1
9.5
74,093
45.9
37.5
293,389
43.8
100.0
782,163
3: COCAINE/ CRACK 14.5
38.8
90,845
16.2
13.4
31,431
14.4
7.4
17,280
2.2
.2
431
14.1
1.0
2,257
15.2
11.0
25,634
10.3
28.2
66,091
13.1
100.0
233,969
4: MARIJUANA/ HASHISH 7.3
16.6
45,523
7.7
5.4
14,909
10.8
4.7
13,012
57.9
4.2
11,417
20.1
1.2
3,218
15.9
9.8
26,751
24.9
58.1
159,319
15.4
100.0
274,149
5: HEROIN 28.3
63.4
177,498
18.6
12.8
35,915
10.6
4.5
12,714
1.2
.1
246
5.5
.3
881
9.5
5.7
16,054
5.7
13.1
36,628
15.7
100.0
279,936
6: NON- PRESCRIPTION METHADONE .2
53.2
1,296
.2
14.4
351
.1
6.8
166
.0
.0
1
.1
.7
17
.1
8.7
212
.1
16.1
392
.1
100.0
2,435
7: OTHER OPIATES AND SYNTHETICS 3.4
51.4
21,522
3.1
14.4
6,050
3.7
10.6
4,425
.4
.2
74
3.2
1.2
520
1.8
7.4
3,102
1.0
14.8
6,206
2.3
100.0
41,899
8: PCP .2
29.0
1,089
.1
6.1
230
.1
4.2
157
.0
.2
8
.2
.7
27
.2
9.4
352
.3
50.4
1,896
.2
100.0
3,759
9: HALLUCINOGENS .2
36.0
1,397
.2
7.9
306
.2
4.8
186
.3
1.3
51
.1
.4
15
.4
19.1
740
.2
30.6
1,186
.2
100.0
3,881
10: METHAMPHETAMINE 3.7
22.9
23,283
2.7
5.2
5,290
3.9
4.6
4,630
2.0
.4
394
2.6
.4
409
7.6
12.5
12,716
8.6
54.0
54,768
5.7
100.0
101,490
11: OTHER AMPHETAMINES .9
29.5
5,783
.4
4.0
775
.8
4.8
938
.5
.5
106
.9
.7
137
1.9
16.0
3,129
1.4
44.5
8,704
1.1
100.0
19,572
12: OTHER STIMULANTS .1
27.8
354
.0
6.9
88
.1
7.2
92
.3
3.9
50
.1
.8
10
.1
14.1
179
.1
39.2
499
.1
100.0
1,272
13: BENZODIAZEPINES .4
37.3
2,635
.6
16.4
1,162
.9
15.1
1,069
.1
.3
24
.4
.8
59
.6
13.6
963
.2
16.3
1,155
.4
100.0
7,067
14: OTHER TRANQUILIZERS .1
35.0
329
.0
9.1
86
.1
11.1
104
.2
3.7
35
.0
.7
7
.0
8.9
84
.0
31.5
296
.1
100.0
941
15: BARBITURATES .1
40.7
624
.1
11.4
175
.2
12.6
193
.0
.1
2
.1
1.0
16
.1
13.1
200
.1
21.0
322
.1
100.0
1,532
16: OTHER SEDATIVES OR HYPNOTICS .2
37.1
1,050
.2
14.6
414
.3
12.4
350
.1
1.0
27
.1
.8
23
.2
9.9
279
.1
24.3
687
.2
100.0
2,830
17: INHALANTS .1
30.0
344
.0
7.0
80
.1
12.0
138
.3
4.7
54
.0
.5
6
.1
12.4
142
.1
33.3
382
.1
100.0
1,146
18: OVER-THE- COUNTER MEDICATIONS .0
29.0
175
.0
9.6
58
.1
16.4
99
.2
6.1
37
.1
2.0
12
.0
11.8
71
.0
25.2
152
.0
100.0
604
20: OTHER .5
34.7
2,914
.3
7.4
620
.7
10.6
891
.9
2.1
176
.2
.4
37
1.1
22.9
1,923
.3
21.9
1,845
.5
100.0
8,406
COL TOTAL 100.0
35.2
627,269
100.0
10.8
193,471
100.0
6.7
120,133
100.0
1.1
19,702
100.0
.9
16,016
100.0
9.4
168,144
100.0
35.8
639,660
100.0
100.0
1,784,395
Color coding: <-2.0 <-1.0 <0.0 >0.0 >1.0 >2.0 Z
N in each cell: Smaller than expected Larger than expected
Allocation of cases
Valid cases 1,784,395
Cases with invalid codes on
row or column variable
98,189
Total cases 1,882,584




Note that the colors in the table are also generated by the government's data, and are also very interesting, particularly related to marijuana/hashish.

The next chart deals with whether marijuana is mentioned at all in connection with treatment (at the admission interview).

Note that in only 24% of individual referrals to treatment is marijuana even mentioned. When you look at all treatment cases where marijuana is mentioned at admission (not necessarily the drug of treatment, but mentioned as having used it), almost half came through criminal justice referrals.



SDA 1.3: Tables

Treatment Episode Data Set, 2002

Data run Aug 03, 2004 (Tue 07:30 PM EDT)
Variables
Role Name Label Range MD Dataset
Row MARFLG MARIJUANA/HASHISH REPORTED AT ADM. 0-1
1
Column PSOURCE PRINCIPAL SOURCE OF REFERRAL 1-7 -9 1
Frequency Distribution
Cells contain:
-Column percent
-Row percent
-N of cases
PSOURCE
1
INDIVIDUAL (INCLUDES SELF-REFERRAL)
2
ALCOHOL/ DRUG ABUSE CARE PROVIDER
3
OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDER
4
SCHOOL (EDUCATIONAL)
5
EMPLOYER/ EAP
6
OTHER COMMUNITY REFERRAL
7
COURT/ CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERRAL/ DUI/DWI
ROW
TOTAL
MARFLG 0: SUBSTANCE NOT REPORTED 75.9
41.2
485,147
70.5
11.6
136,812
69.6
7.3
86,025
30.1
.5
6,397
63.1
.9
10,296
63.1
9.3
109,044
52.7
29.3
345,099
64.7
100.0
1,178,820
1: SUBSTANCE REPORTED 24.1
24.0
154,281
29.5
8.9
57,298
30.4
5.8
37,549
69.9
2.3
14,844
36.9
.9
6,016
36.9
9.9
63,787
47.3
48.2
310,105
35.3
100.0
643,880
COL TOTAL 100.0
35.1
639,428
100.0
10.6
194,110
100.0
6.8
123,574
100.0
1.2
21,241
100.0
.9
16,312
100.0
9.5
172,831
100.0
35.9
655,204
100.0
100.0
1,822,700
Color coding: <-2.0 <-1.0 <0.0 >0.0 >1.0 >2.0 Z
N in each cell: Smaller than expected Larger than expected
Allocation of cases
Valid cases 1,822,700
Cases with invalid codes on
row or column variable
59,884
Total cases 1,882,584
Datasets
1
/SDA/SAMHDA/04022-0001
2
/SDA/SAMHDA/04022-0001
CSM, UC Berkeley






comment []

Drug WarRant | MessageBoard | Book Store | Gift Shop | About the Author | Drug War Victims | DEA Targets America


Drug WarRant
© Copyright 2007 Pete Guither. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 6/29/07; 11:17:31 AM.

Powered by