Drug WarRant by Pete Guither Heading Image

California - U.S. Senate and House Candidate Endorsements based on drug war policy reform

Note: This is an old Voting Guide.
Go to the New Drug WarRant.net Voting Guide

Make a difference in California

Drug WarRant is providing information to help you make decisions on voting and supporting candidates. Be aware that the information provided here ONLY relates to drug policy reform, and there are other reasons to vote for a candidate.

However, drug policy reform is a critical issue, and one that is too often neglected by candidates, unless the voters make it critical.

Below each candidate, you will see information about their drug policy reform views and/or voting record. (see the criteria at right for definitions).

A red check mark is a Drug WarRant endorsement. A vote for them will be a vote for drug policy reform. In some cases there may be multiple good options. In other cases, there just isn't a good candidate. More endorsements will come as the election nears. If you have additional information about a candidate's drug policy positions, please contact Drug WarRant.

If you don't know your district, go to Project Vote Smart and enter your zip code to find out your district and detailed information on all the candidates.



Note: For another great resource on voting in California, visit the Drug Policy Forum of California Election Guide.

Criteria

1. The National Political Awareness Test (NPAT) asks candidates which items they will support if elected. Not all candidates have answered the questionaire.
For the purposes of Drug WarRant's endorsements, we have focused on the following specific items from the NPAT:

NPAT Drugs: Indicate which principles you support (if any) regarding drugs.
  1. Support mandatory jail sentences for selling illegal drugs.
  2. Expand federally sponsored drug education and drug treatment programs.
  3. Decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana.
  4. Allow doctors to prescribe marijuana to their patients for medicinal purposes.
  5. Increase border security to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the United States.
  6. Eliminate federal funding for programs associated with the "war on drugs."
  7. Other or expanded principles
For the purposes of endorsement, clearly the most important areas are "c, d, and f." A candidate with all three is gold. Selection "a" is a negative factor (although some consider this only for violent or major drug dealers). Selection "e" should be negative, but is confusing. There are some candidates who have an enlightened view of drug policy, who still choose "e" simply because of the heightened border concerns since 9/11, so there may be more involved in that response. At a minimum, a candidate should have chosen "d." The choice of "c" and/or "f" add greatly to their attractiveness.

NPAT Colombia funding: Should the United States increase its financial support to Colombia to combat "the war on drugs"? "No" is the preferred answer here (at a minimum -- in fact, the answer should be to reduce funding, rather than just not increasing it). It is possible that someone could claim they are for increased funding to Colombia, but not for spraying or military purposes, but rather humanitarian purposes -- this seems a stretch, however, so I am looking for a solid "No" here.
2. The Hinchey Amendment.
The incumbents have had two opportunities (2003/2004) to vote on an amendment that would stop the federal government from interfering with medical marijuana in states where it is legal. There was no legitimate reason to vote against this (and it was a bipartisan amendment), so a "no" vote is generally an indication of ignorance, or being in the pocket of the drug warriors. The proper response is: "Hinchey: Yes/Yes." There is no excuse for California representatives to vote "No." Since California is one of the medical marijuana states, a "No" vote on Hinchey is inviting the feds to come in and harrass their own constitutents for following state law!
3. Other criteria.
Where there is useful information from campaign web sites or news reports, those details are added here. If you have additional information (preferably with links), please let me know.
US Senatebox Marsha J. Feinland (Peace and Freedom)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Don J. Grundmann (American Independent)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,e,f,g GREATLY INCREASE PENALTIES FOR LAUNDERING OF DRUG MONEY. ELIMINATE MANDATORY SENTENCE LAWS FOR LOW LEVEL ASSOCIATES OF OR INTERACTORS WITH DRUG DEALERS.; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes

box Barbara Boxer (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: No answers; NPAT Colombia funding: No answer

box James P. Gray (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g GET THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OUT OF MARIJUANA PROHIBITION, AND LEAVE THAT FOR THE STATES.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Bill Jones (R)
No NPAT

James P. Gray is a former California Supreme Court Judge and author of "Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It: A Judicial Indictment of the War on Drugs". He is running completely on a platform of drug policy reform, so every vote for him is a specific and clear statement. He won't win, but this is one race where all votes in losing battle count if he can make a good showing.
US House 1box Pamela Elizondo (G)
NPAT Drugs: f,g drug use is a prochoice issue its unconstitutional for anyone to tell us what we or ours can injest; NPAT Columbia funding: No

box C. Michael "Mike" Thompson (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Lawrence R. Wiesner (R)
NPAT Drugs: d; NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided

The incumbent has a good record, so I'm sticking with him, unless I hear more
US House 2box Walter "Wally" Herger (R) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,b,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes; Hinchey: No/No

box Michael D. Johnson (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

This one's easy. Herger has completely abdicated his responsibilities by defying California voters on medical marijuana and inviting the feds to come arrest them for following state laws. Johnson's got excellent drug policy views.
US House 3box Gabe Castillo (D)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided

box Dan Lungren (R)
No NPAT

box Douglas Arthur Tuma (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g End the Drug War. Release Drug War prisoners. Pay reparations.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

This is an open seat, and Dan Lungren is leading by a long shot in the amount of fundraising. Lungren is real drug warrior -- a former California Attorney General who targeted medical marijuana users. Having him in Congress would be bad news. I'm not thrilled with Castillo's answers, but at least he favors medical marijuana, and he has a better chance to beat Lungren than Tuma, who has great answers, but appears to have very limited visibility. If you don't want to vote for Castillo, be sure to go out and vote for Tuma.
US House 4box John T. Doolittle (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box David I Winters (D)
No NPAT

Not a great choice here. Winters hasn't said much that I can find about drug policy, but I'll pretty much give an automatic endorsement to any opponent of a California incumbent, when the current officeholder has actually voted against the Hinchey amendment.
US House 5box Pat W. Driscoll (G)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f,g The only thing the "war on drugs" has accomplished is to help the U.S. achieve the dubious distinction of incarcerating more people, and primarily young men of color, than any other nation both on a total and a per-capita basis.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Mike R. Dugas (R)
NPAT Drugs: d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Robert T. Matsui (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/NV

box John C. Reiger (Peace and Freedom)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; Colombia funding: No

US House 6box Paul L. Erickson (R)
NPAT Drugs: c,d; Colombia funding: Yes

box Lynn C. Woolsey (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,e,g EXPAND E - ASSIST DEVELOPING LOCAL ECONOMIES SO PEOPLE CAN PROSPER AND SUPPORT THEIR FAMILIES IN THEIR HOME COUNTRY; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 7box Charles R. Hargrave (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,c,d,e,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box George Miller (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: NV/Yes

This endorsement came about through the assistance of Drug Policy Forum of California, which states that Rep. George Miller ... has been a strong supporter of MJ reform for 30 years. His voting record is 90%+ on drug reform issues over this time.
US House 8box Leilani Dowell (Peace and Freedom)
No NPAT

box Jennifer A. Depalma (R)
NPAT Drugs: c,d; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Nancy Pelosi (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 9box James M. "Jim" Eyer (L)
NPAT Drugs: g Only physical or financial harm to non-participants should be illegal. h) prohibition does not work. i) per 10th Ammendment drug laws should be prerogative of states.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Barbara Lee (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,d,e; NPAT Colombia: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Claudia Bermudez (R)
No NPAT

US House 10box Jeff R. Ketelson (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided

box Ellen O. Tauscher (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,b,d,e SUPPORT DIVERSION PROGRAMS THAT INCLUDE TREATMENT FOR 1ST TIME DRUG OFFENDERS.; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 11box Richard W. Pombo (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box Gerald "Jerry" McNerney (D)
No NPAT

Again, it almost doesn't matter who the opponent was, when the incumbent voted against the Hinchey amendment.
US House 12box Mike Garza (R)
No NPAT

box Patricia "Pat" Gray (G)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f,g get the CIA out of the drug running business; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Harland Harrison (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Tom Lantos (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 13box Fortney H. "Pete" Stark (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box George I. Bruno (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided

box Mark W. Stroberg (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

US House 14box Anna G. Eshoo (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box John C. "Chris" Haugen (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes

box Brian Holtz (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g Allow adults to decide what substances to consume. No prior restraint, but massive punishment for negligence.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

US House 15box Raymond L. Chukwu (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes

box Michael M. "Mike" Honda (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/NV

US House 16box Zoe Lofgren (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Douglas Adams McNea (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,d: NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided

box Markus Welch (L)
No NPAT

US House 17box Sam Farr (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No: Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Mark J. Risely (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,c,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes

box Joel R. Smolen (L)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,g The current "war on drugs" is not working and instead we are creating a drug dependent society where drug trafficking is creating a rich and well organized crime culture. Just a prohibition did not work, I suggest we re examine our drug policy and look to decimalization and treatment as an effective way to remove the money incentive from drugs and concentrate on education and as an appropriate alternative.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Raymond C. Glock-Grueneich (G)
No NPAT

box Joseph B. Williams (Peace and Freedom)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia: No

Some interesting choices, but the incumbent already voted the right way on Hinchey. Risely, on the other hand, seems to be a bit confused.
US House 18box Dennis A. Cardoza (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,d,c,e; NPAT Colombia: Undecided; Hinchey: No/No

box Charles F. Pringle (R)
No NPAT

Cardoza makes no sense. He says he's for medical marijuana and then votes to have the feds come and arrest them!
US House 19box James A. "Lex" Bufford (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f,g END THE PROHIBITION OF MARIJUANA, TAX AND REGULATE. REFORM DRUG LAWS. I SUPPORT MEDICAL MARIJUANA AMNESTY FOR THOSE IMPRISONED SOLELY FOR MARIJUANA VIOLATIONS.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Larry R. Mullen (G)
No NPAT

box George P. Radanovich (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

US House 20box Roy Ashburn (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No Answer

box Jim Costa (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes

This is a bad one. We need some new candidates here.
US House 21box Devin G. Nunes (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box Fred B. Davis (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

US House 22box William M. "Bill" Thomas (R) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,g Support local youth programs like the Police Activities League to encourage children to reject drugs.; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

Another bad one. The only one running is unacceptable. Go to the polls and vote for other races, but leave this one blank. (and then start thinking about running in opposition in two years)
US House 23box Lois Capps (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Donald E. Regan (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,c,d; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Michael Favorite (L)
No NPAT

US House 24box Stuart A. Bechman (G)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Elton W. Gallegly (R) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided; Hinchey: No/No

box Brett Wagner (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,d; NPAT Columbia funding: No

Both Bechman and Wagner would be a great improvement over Gallegly.
US House 25box Howard P. "Buck" McKeon (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box Fred "Tim" Willoughby (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d; NPAT Colombia funding: No

US House 26box David T. Dreier (R) Incumbent
No NPAT: Hinchey: No/No

box Cynthia M. Matthews (D)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Randall G. Weissbuch (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g End the insane, immoral, racist, failed war on drugs: NPAT Colombia funding: No

A couple of excellent choices here, and the incumbent Dreier isn't one of them.
US House 27box Eric J. Carter (G)
No NPAT

box Robert M. Levy (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No Answer

box Brad J. Sherman (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 28box Howard L. Berman (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box David R. Hernandez (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Kelley L. Ross (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g end federal drug laws, all unconstitutional; NPAT Colombia funding: No

US House 29box Ted Brown (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g There should be no drug laws. Adults should be allowed to put any substance in their bodies that they choose. NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Adam B. Schiff (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Philip Koebel (G)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Harry Frank Scolinos (R)
No NPAT

US House 30box Victor D. Elizalde (R)
NPAT Drugs: b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes

box Henry A. Waxman (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 31box Xavier Becerra (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Luis Vega (R)
NPAT Drugs: b; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes

US House 32box Leland Thomas Faegre (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Hilda L. Solis (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

This is a change of endorsement. While I applaud Solis for voting "Yes" on Hinchey, Faegre has the better overall drug policy, and deserves the endorsement.
US House 33box Diane E. Watson (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Rebert G. Weber (L)
No NPAT

US House 34box Lucille Roybal-Allard (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Wayne Miller (R)
No NPAT

US House 35box Charles Tate (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g Prohibition does not work; NPAT Columbia funding: No

box Ross Moen (R)
No NPAT

box Maxine Waters (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Gordon Michael Mego (American Independent)
NPAT Drugs: b,e,g Investigate, Eliminate, and Prosecute Individuals, Organizations, and Financial Institutions Involved with Depositing, Laundering, etc. of Profits from Illegal Drug Trade.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

US House 36box Jane Harman (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Paul Whitehead (R)
No NPAT

box Mike Binkley (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g THE FEDERAL GOV'T HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO PASS ANY DRUG LAW. HOWEVER FOOLISH ALCOHOL PROHIBITION WAS, IT HAD 18TH AMENDMENT.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Alice M. Stek (Peace and Freedom)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

US House 37box Juanita Millender-McDonald (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Herbert G. "Herb" Peters (L)
No NPAT

box Vernon V. Van (R)
No NPAT

US House 38box Grace Flores Napolitano (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 39box Tim Escobar (R)
No NPAT

box Linda T. Sanchez (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 40box Edard R. "Ed" Royce (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box J. Tillman Williams (D)
No NPAT

Endorsement based on any alternative to the incumbent's vote on Hinchey being an improvement.
US House 41box Jerry Lewis (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box Peymon Mottahedek (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,f,g LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

This is a very clear and easy choice!
US House 42box Gary G. Miller (R) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,b,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Yes; Hinchey: No/No

box Lewis M. Myers (D)
NPAT Drugs: a,b,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No Answer

US House 43box Joe Baca (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box Ed Laning (R)
No NPAT

US House 44box Kevin D. Akin (Peace and Freedom)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f Free and freely available drug treament programs are needed. Most drug use is a medical problem, and the futile (but profitable) "war on drugs" is a destructive fiasco.; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Ken S. Calvert (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box Louis Vandenberg (D)
No NPAT

Calvert needs to go. Don't know anything about Vandenberg.
US House 45box Mary Whitaker Bono (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Richard J. Meyer (D)
No NPAT

US House 46box Jim D. Brandt (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Keith D. Gann (L)
No NPAT

box Thomas "Tom" W. Lash (G)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Dana T. Rohrabacher (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

While there are other candidates with good views in this race, Dana Rohrabacher has co-sponsored the Hinchey amendment both years, and has consistently stood up for the rights of California constituents against federal instrusion.
US House 47box Alexandria A. "Alex" Coronado (R)
No NPAT

box Loretta B. Sanchez (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

US House 48box Bruce D. Cohen (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Christopher Cox (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box John L. Graham (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

Take your pick. Either Cohen or Graham would be better than Cox.
US House 49box Darrell Issa (R) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: No/No

box Michael P. Byron (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,e,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Lars R. Grossmith (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g END THE DRUG WAR; NPAT Colombia funding: No

Either Byron or Grossmith would be a vast improvement over Issa.
US House 50box Francine P. Busby (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,g; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Randall H. "Duke" "Randy" Cunningham (R) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No Answer; Hinchey: No/No

box Brandon C. Osborne (L)
No NPAT

box Gary M. Waayers (G)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Diane J. Templin (American Independent)
NPAT Drugs: d,e; NPAT Colombia funding: No

I don't know enough here to call it. Just don't vote for Cunningham.
US House 51box Bob Filner (D) Incumbent
No NPAT; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Michael S. Metti (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Michael Steven Giorgino (R)
No NPAT

The incumbent has already shown the right vote on Hinchey.
US House 52box Michael Benoit (L)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f,g End the War on Drugs; NPAT Colombia funding: No

box Duncan L. Hunter (R) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided; Hinchey: No/No

box Brian S. Keliher (D)
NPAT Drugs: b,c,d; NPAT Colombia funding: No

Hunter needs to go. Take your pick: Benoit's got a great view on the drug war, Keliher has a much better approach than Hunter and a better chance of winning.
US House 53box Susan A. Davis (D) Incumbent
NPAT Drugs: a,b,d,e,g I support increased funding for drug demand reduction programs. We must reduce demand in conjunction with our foreign counter-narcotics efforts.; NPAT Colombia funding: No; Hinchey: Yes/Yes

box Adam Van Susteren (L)
No NPAT

box Darin S. Hunzeker (R)
NPAT Drugs: a,e; NPAT Colombia funding: Undecided

box Lawrence P. Rockwood (G)
NPAT Drugs: c,d,f; NPAT Colombia funding: No

Susan's a little confused about demand and supply and needs some educating. However, as an incumbent, she voted the right way on Hinchey and have the correct view on Colombia. (and Hunzeker would be unacceptable)


Back to main voting guide page.






comment []

Drug WarRant | MessageBoard | Book Store | Gift Shop | About the Author | Drug War Victims | DEA Targets America


Drug WarRant
© Copyright 2007 Pete Guither. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 6/29/07; 11:17:32 AM.

Powered by