World O'Crap
A daily diatribe about current events, bad movies, pop culture, Ann Coulter, etc.


GREATEST HITS






BLOG ROLL!


CURRENT EVENTS & STUFF














































POP CULTURE/PERSONAL ESSAY/OTHER GOOD STUFF











Subscribe to "World O'Crap" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

 

Monday, August 08, 2005
 

 

It's Sad, Really

 

Poor Roger L. Simon.  It seems that he is chastising me for maligning the great Charles Johnson by posting a line from Charles' blog, LittleGreenFootballs.  (Some have claimed that Mr Simon is just mad that he didn't to be included in the Blog Stars team for our game of Ultimate Wingnut Challenge, but I think that he's defending Charles to prove his loyalty to his squadron in the 101st Fighting Keyboarders.) 

Mr. Simon says:

Meanwhile, another example of Charles-bashing today can be found on the fire-breathing Salon...Yes, they are still there... under the "highly-sophisticated" blog title World O'Crap. The wannabe Mencken who blogs under that moniker attacks Little Green Footballs for linking a story from The Independent about a possible 100,000 trained terrorists now in Britain.  Never mind that The Independent is one of England's leading liberal-left publications... someone who names his blog World O'Crap could be ignorant of such niceties... or that the article raises significant issues for Britain and for the West: the importance is to bash Charles. Yet this man knows Charles from Adam. He assumes Charles is conservative on all subjects because he is militant on the WoT. Nothing could be further from the truth. This is the kind of childish partyline thinking that makes bloggers like this blind to new ideas and has turned Salon, an Internet pioneer, into an old fashioned publication scarcely worth reading.

Sadly, the alleged mystery novelist and screenwriter who blogs under the moniker Roger L. Simon has missed the boat on a few crucial details.

1.  I didn't attack Charles for linking to a story in The Independent, I "attacked" him for his characterization of this story (and for his blog's recurrent insistence that Muslims shouldn't be allowed to live in our world).  Note to Mr. Simon: The Independent didn't say anything British authorities worshipping "at the altars of unrestricted immigration and willfully blind multiculturalism."  And The Independent didn't title its story "Every One of Them Knows How to Use an AK-47."  So, claiming that I am bashing Charles for linking to the story is kind of disingenuous, n'est-ce pas?

2.  Oh, and Mr. Simon, I do happen to know about The Independent's "liberal-left" tilt -- but thanks for asking. 

Oh, wait, you didn't ask, you just assumed I was bashing the newspaper because I took exception to Charles' post.  And from that, you somehow deduced that I was unaware of the paper's editorial policy, and was stupidly getting out of lock-step with the whole liberal-left-socialist-communist movement -- and therefore, the whole thing was ironic, like rain on your wedding day or something.  Sorry, but even though you might not like this blog's moniker, that doesn't mean that I am ignorant of such niceties as the ability to read.  You, however ...  

3.  It's true that I do know Charles from Adam.  Adam, while not exactly a friend of mine, is known to me from a certain book (and we also have friends in common).  Charles, sir, is no Adam. 

However as studies have proven, I am not a man.  Therefore, Mr. Simon, you obviously don't know me from Adam (but might be able to tell us apart if we were in a line-up).  Therefore, since I seem to know more about Charles (and Adam) than you know about me, I think this proves that you need to get out more (and should probably brush up your use of popular idiomatic phrases).

4.  I don't assume that Charles is conservative on everything.  Why would I?  And why is it relevant?  I do, however, know that Charles is militant (to the point of creepiness and fascism) on the WoT.  I find that there is enough there alone for decent people to take exception to his expressed opinions without delving into his views on monetary policy or trade embargoes.

5.  My blog has nothing to do with Salon magazine.  Salon is not operating under the name "World O'Crap."  One would think that a mystery novelist and screenwriter would be able to figure out these kinds of things.

As Mr. Simon's readers commented, Wo'C is merely one of hundred blogs run by RadioUserLand software, and hosted at a site with Salon in the address.  I pay a subscription fee to RadioUserLand, and somewhere at the magazine there is a link to another link that will take you to a list of Salon blogs.  That is the extent of our relationship. The magazine's editorial board doesn't read my blog, so I really don't think I can be blamed for Salon magazine's perceived decline in quality. 

6.  As Alex at Martini Republic points out, The Independent doesn't say anything about a "possible 100,000 trained terrorists now in England."  No, the piece merely states that, "A well-connected source said there were more than 100,000 people in Britain from 'completely militarised' regions, including Somalia."  And, like Alex said, some of those people may well be women, children, old guys, etc -- and anyway, most people from militarized regions aren't actually trained terrorists.  In fact, another anonymous source cited in the article claims that "MI5 is working to an estimate that more than 10,000 young men from these regions [the Horn of Africa and central Asia] have had at least basic training in light weapons and military explosives."  And so, if only 10,000 of these immigrants are young men who have had some kind of weapons and explosives training, it seems kind of a reach to claim that there are 100,000 possible trained terrorists now in England.

Anyway, read Alex's post for more on this.

And then go to Sadly, No! and read the recent posts on the TaliBen, Focus on the Family's plan to keep your kids from turning gay, and the new Jack Chick cartoon about Gavin and Brad going to hell.  They, Mr. Simon, are the wannabe Menckens!

 


8:14:51 PM    
comment [] trackback []

 

A Way to Support the Troops AND Spite Fred Phelps

 

Julia has the details -- check it out.  And if you can spare a couple of bucks, make a contribution; your demonstration of love just might make Fred melt, like the Wicked Witch of the West at the end of the Wizard of Oz


6:52:14 PM    
comment [] trackback []

 

Ultimate Wingnut Challenge: The Blog Stars

 

Okay, I put these guys off until last because I find them tedious (but not in a good way).  And then I got sick - and while I can't actually blame it on them, it was probably their fault. 

And that's why they will get short shrift in today's contest, in that they will only be allowed to present a sentence (or paragraph, max) upon which to be judged.  You are to evaluate each blogger's work for vapidity, ego, stupidity, and general annoyance, and then vote two of our contestants off the island. 

If you want some addititional info upon which to base your decision, consult this this piece from Fables of the Reconstruction, which concisely describes many of our contestants' work (and which therefore which has got their panties in a bunch).

Here's part of Powerline's reaction to it: 

This post by a left-wing blogger apparently is what passes for discourse on the other side of the blogosphere. ... The blurb on Michelle Malkin tells you all you need to know about the blogger who wrote it and more importantly those, such as Atrios, who linked favorably to it.

Of course, what The Bishop really means is that the blurb on Powerline tells you all you need to know about the blogger who wrote it and those who linked favorably to it: that they are big poopie heads.

But anyway, if we get through this team, then we've presented all of our contestants and can, in good conscience, start the purge we've dreamed of.

So, let's meet our Blog Stars!  (And they all are men, because, as we all know, there are no women bloggers.)

1.  Our first contestant is Hugh Hewitt, author of the book Blog, and the guy who invented blogging a couple of years after Glen Reyonds made it popular.

His selection comes from a post in which he waxes indignant about allegations that, while investigating John Roberts' background,  the NY Times looked into the adoptions of the two Roberts' children.

Every time I think that MSM has finally hit bottom and cannot find a way to fall off the floor, some part of it digs a new cellar to dive deeper into.  

Because it's just plain evil to investigate allegatons that Roberts and his wife stole the children from a 1940s movie.  The media should just assume that the White House would never nominate anybody with anything untoward in his or her background, and should just ignore claims that the Roberts children are being cared for by Bernie Kerik's nanny.

2.  Our next contestant, Glenn Reynolds, announces that his blog, Instanpundit, turns four today.

How has the blog changed? You may have a clearer sense of that than I do. I think it's become a bit less opinionated -- the older entries were mostly opinion; now I'm more likely to link to somone's actual reporting, or to an item of news without commenting on it much.

Indeed.

3. Hindrocket from Powerline (now with 500% of the RDA of kerning) brings us a story about an army sergeant who got a Cub Scout pack in the U.S. to collect donated shoes, which were then given to an orphanage in Djibouti.

I like this story for what it says about the Scouts; suffice it to say that there aren't any African orphans who are wearing shoes, for the first time in their lives, courtesy of the well-funded, prestigious groups that have done their best to destroy the Boy Scouts.

So, the next time your civil rights are being violated, don't call the ACLU, call the Cub Scouts -- they'll get Birkenstock to give you some shoes.

But HIndrocket isn't done. No, he has a little lecture for us about how African kids aren't stupid just because they didn't have the good sense to be born here (and YOU said they must be idiots because they chose to be orphans!):

These kids aren't stupid, and they aren't hopeless. They share the natural optimism of youth with every other kid born anywhere else in the world. Their optimism and ambition aren't misplaced, but they require a few basic preconditions to be realistic--a normal government, and a normal free-market economy. Given those fundamental realities, and with an occasional helping hand from the Cub Scouts and others who wish them well, there is no reason why these girls' hopes should be futile.

So, I guess the plan is for the Cub Scouts to overthrow the Djibouti goverment and institute a free-market economy there.

4.  Now, here's the LittleGreenFootballs guy.  (Sure, I said that he was out of the game and would be replaced by one of the women from The Cotillion, but it turns out they are even more annoying than he is.)

"Every One of Them Knows How to Use an AK-47"

Britain has a problem—a huge problem that has been growing for decades, while British authorities worshipped at the altars of unrestricted immigration and willfully blind multiculturalism:
Intelligence chiefs warn Blair of home-grown ‘insurgency’.

If only Blair had listend to Charles!  He's been saying for the last 3 years (or however long he's been blogging), that the only good Arab is a dead Arab.  Now maybe somebody will believe him!

5.  Our challenger is Jay Tea of Wizbangblog.  His topic is the previously mentioned Fables of the Reconstruction post.  While he has a lot to say on the subject, here are a couple of highlights.

But where are the thinkers of the left? Where are the serious essayists, the scholars, the contemplators who would provide balance to the sheer intellectual power of the above? {...]

I went looking through the big liberal blogs, and was left wanting. Atrios? Nope. Eschaton? Nope.

Yes, Jay checked the blogs of both Atrios and Eschaton, and neither one was a serious essayist.  Obviouxly Jay did a lot of research before concluding that the Left lacks thinkers.

However, here's some serious thinking on the part of Jay, as he answers the FotR charge that Powerline is "led by someone who nicknamed himself 'Hindrocket.' Talk about being manly in that protests-too-much way."

The guy's name is "Hinderacker." He was probably hung with the nickname "Hindrocket" in grade school. Which makes the sophomoric insult very appropriate.

So, if HIndrocket got the nickname in grade school, then it proves that he actually is manly? 

Um, okay.  That's telling 'em, Jay!

 

Anyway, let's give a round of lacklustre applause for the members of our Blog Star Team: Hugh Hewitt, Glen Reynolds, Hindrocket, the LittleGreenFootballs guy, and Jay Tea. 

Now, vote off two of them, using either the above examples of their work, whatever you already know about them, or your six-sided dice.  Just get rid of them of them!   Because once we're done with that, we can have another elimination round, and get rid of everybody on this team.


3:04:44 AM    
comment [] trackback []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 World O' Crap.
Last update: 8/31/2005; 1:54:35 AM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.
August 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jul   Sep