Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Buddhism and other Eastern spiritual traditions do get idealized in the West, don't they? Protestantism, Catholicism, and Judaism, in postmodernity, get drubbed from all quarters as "patriarchal" and "authoritarian." Their native sons and daughters, in their stead, embrace Eastern spiritual teachings as ever-consistent and ever-beneficial--their promulgators, of course, having only the purest of motives.

Oh, I've even thought that perhaps "Marin County" isn't a geographic locale, as much as it is a state of mind. I live in Oakland, a half-hour away and a world apart in attitude from this ghastly-expensive wooded enclave at the forefront of the New Age movement. It seems even here I cannot escape the "Free Tibet" bumper-stickers that dot every other car. Or the malas hanging from rear-view mirrors.

I don't have anything against Eastern spiritual practices, per se. I just want to see followers disillusioned slightly--divested of the childlike credulity I finding so irritating. I want to see beliefs questioned. That's why I was thrilled to come across Authoritarianism in Buddhism.

The writings indexed at the site, which I mentioned in my last entry, are sometimes soberly critical, other times irreverent--always original and startling. If you only read one piece, I recommend Michael Parenti's monograph, Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth, about the idealization of Tibet in the West, and the weight of hard evidence to show local monks' oppression of peasants before the Chinese invasion. I also recommend Buddhist Modernism and the American Buddhist Lineage, by Laurence O. McKinney. The piece argues the existence of a distinctively American Buddhism, or "Yankee Doodle Dharma," without which Asian Buddhism would not have taken the form we recognize it in today.
8:47:03 PM    comment []