|
my opinion? Kerry looked confident and on the ball. He supported his points with facts and details. Bush? Lots of sputtering, uuhhs--the not-quite pregnant pauses were uncomfortable to watch. Bush side stepped a lot of questions with wierd assumptive statements like "I'm the president, of course I know it's hard..." (a paraphrase) when answering the question of sending troops into war. He didn't have many facts to back up his already imprecise points. He almost looked as uncomfortable as when he debated Gore except now he's gotten comfortable in his cushy incumbent seat. I think there is more at stake now, though and the only thing that can and may ruin this is post-debate spin. That's what happened with the Gore debates. 11:32:56 PM |
|
bingo... I am finally convinced this is the man to vote for! Here is a good blow-by-blow account of the ass whupping George W. Bush got from Senator John Kerry. http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/blog/09/30/begala.blog/ also... I know Salon readers are fairly liberal so I don't know if their poll counts, but here are some results: Salon Who will win the first presidential debate? George Bush 291 John Kerry 1981 11:08 PM, EST fom https://sub.salon.com/poll/?viewPoll=17
msnbc.com Who won the debate? George Bush 28 % John Kerry 72% And Time magazine has these numbers... George Bush 45.1 % John Kerry 51.9% with the rest 2.9 % voting a draw. 10:58:15 PM |