| |
|
Saturday, March 27, 2004
|
|
The inimitable Bill Frist is calling for declassifying Clarke's earlier
testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee to investigate the
possibility that Mr. Clarke committed perjury, either then, or in his
sworn testimony to the 9-11 commission this week.
I don't know if Clarke lied in either instance. I imagine that
his Senate testimony is pretty much an effort to support the Bush
administration's anti-terrorism efforts without wandering too far from
the truth. The senators were not, after all, asking him for his
ideas on how to pursue al Queda and other terrorist groups. They
were grilling him on administration policy and activity.
All well and good. What seems to be lost in the debate, however,
is that ther is absolutely no need to declassify the earlier testimony
to investigate a charge of perjury. The senate surely has
the transcripts; anyone with Tivo or a VCR can supply them the
9-11 testimony. They can sit down and compare, and if they find
bad, bad things, they can forward it to the Justice Department, which
itself can handle classified information.
So why declassify? I mean, these guys aren't just looking for a
way to get it into the public record so fair and balanced press
coverage can nit it and pick it and slime Mr. Clarke? That just
wouldn't be right. It would be unpatriotic for our august leaders
to behave that way, surely.
11:47:50 AM   
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004 Jon Moyer.
Last update: 3/30/2004; 4:48:43 PM.
|
|
| March 2004 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| 21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
| 28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
| Feb Apr |
|
|