| |
|
Monday, March 29, 2004
|
|
Condi's defense of Bush's pressing Clarke to find an Iraqi connection to
9/11 is correct, up to a point. It was a question that had to be asked,
even though the answer was as certain as a sunset. Clearly, our
rule-by-his-gut President was going with his gut on this one -- after all,
Cheney, Condi, Wolfie and Rummy had all been tutoring him on the
state-based theory of combatting terrorism from day one. Rule-By-His-Gut
may be a slow learner, but after 8 months something probably sunk in.
That the only question Bush asked of Clarke was "what's the connection to
Iraq" is the real butt scorcher here. Here you are, the President of the
United States, your country had just been attacked by terrorists, and
you're in the room with the man who been deeply involved in the
anti-terrorist efforts of four presidents, who knew more about terrorism's
roster, financing, networks, activities, locations and tactics than just
about anyone else on the planet. And the only question you can come up
with is "What's up with Iraq?"??? No request for recommendations, no
discussion of tactical options, nothing.
The next time a red-stater proclaims that Bush wasn't asleep at the
switch, remind him that when the heat was on, when the country had just
been attacked, Bush sent one of his best men on a fool's errand.
8:12:54 AM   
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004 Jon Moyer.
Last update: 3/30/2004; 4:48:44 PM.
|
|
| March 2004 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| 21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
| 28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
| Feb Apr |
|
|