The Grace Pages
A rest-stop for fellow pilgrims




































Subscribe to "The Grace Pages" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


17 June 2004
 

Things I liked about it, things I disliked about it and the burning question of whether I will ever return to it

I'm talking about "ministry", by the way.

According to my aunt, the pleasure of whose company we are enjoying for three months, all the folks at church back in BC are asking after me, wondering what I'm doing, and wondering what the hell I'm doing being confirmed in the Anglican Church. The one-time-Senior-Pastor probably thinks I've gone totally off my rocker. I remember him dismissing Anglicans as "a bunch of pinks" (I think that is roughly equivalent to "commies"), pretty much the same way he'd dismiss anyone who didn't meet his standards. Anyway, he's probably praying for my soul as we speak. And I think the burning question folks everywhere -- well, any of the handful of folks who ever had the misfortune to know me as "Pastor" -- are asking is, Will he ever return to ministry?

For those who don't know, I was Associate Pastor in a smalltown Pentecostal church for about eighteen months. After that, I was a sort-of-intern at a wee evangelical church somewhere else, but that lasted less than a couple of months. And, just to round off the story, when I returned to England last year, I went back to a place I had revisited time and again on my Christian walk: The Anglican Church. In May last year I was confirmed.

So, back to that burning question: Will I return to ministry?

Well, apparently a good way to approach these things is to make a list of good points and bad points, and weigh them up against each other. I'm an INFP, and they're not supposed to be good at that kind of thing, but let's give it a go anyway.

Actually, for all the pain that went with being a rapidly apostasizing (he says tongue-in-cheek) minister in a fairly fundamentalist church, I can't say I regret the experience one iota. I loved the people, and I cherish the good memories. I loved ministry, and the bad experiences didn't put me off. I loved having an excuse  to help people and reach out to people. I'm not always that great initiating contact with people, depending on the situation. (That's the I in my INFP.) But having that label "Pastor" is like an excuse or a reason so no one thinks you're crazy for wanting to help them and spend time with them and do something good for them. I guess I loved ministry because I'm a "people person" (see, I'm contradicting myself now), and I relish opportunities to share the grace, love and acceptance of Jesus in all the million and one ways there are to do it. I loved that people looked to me to hear the good news that God loved them and forgave them and accepted them in Jesus, because that's a message I want to proclaim, and it changes people.

Here's what I didn't like. I hated the way you'd be expected to have black-and-white answers to everyone's pressing questions. What was especially frustrating was that if I failed to give people the black-and-white answers, they'd run to the nearest Bible-bashing fundy study leader who'd spin them some yarn they just heard from their favourite televangelist on TBN. They were just like that: They'd been nurtured as Christians to believe that the Bible was the equivalent of God's 101 Questions and Answers about Life, the Universe and Everything, and they expected me to dish up the condensed version all the time.

I hated having to keep all my questions to myself, but I guess that was more a product of being a heretical wayfarer in a static fundamentalist culture.

Actually, now I think about it, I can't really find all that many negatives at all. I mean, sure, there were lots of negatives -- I was treated pretty shabbily by a certain Senior Pastor -- but I'm not so sure I can attribute them to ministry itself so much as the particular religious milieu I found myself in, or the attitudes of people I happened to be working with. The other day I found myself reading a bunch of letters I had sent to a friend during some lonely times in ministry, and the one thing that really shines through is that despite all my struggles, my heart was really in ministry. I spoke with real joy and enthusiasm about serving the Lord in that way, even though there were a thousand other things taking place back then that could easily have robbed me of that.

So I guess the answer is looking like, Yes, I will return to ministry. Actually, I already knew that, but just wanted to show you how I got to that place.

But there are added complications now, I have to admit. Despite being an Anglican, I have this ironic non-conformist streak, and I don't know if I can see myself in a dog-collar and robes playing by the rules. This entry was going to be an exploration of that issue, but I can see it's gone on far too long already. (Which reminds me, when I was taught to preach half-hour- or hour-long sermons, how on earth will I make out trying to keep within the standard Anglican seven minutes?)

To lots of you, this post is going to look like an incoherent mess, a ragbag assemblage (is that a word?) of musings. It does to me. So many other questions pop up all over the place when I ask myself about returning to ministry, like, What is "ministry"? Since when was ministry the domain of a professional? What's all this about being a "priest"? But it's going to have to remain an incoherent mess for now, and maybe I'll address all that other crap in another entry, another day.

Dave


10:53:34 PM    comment []

Strange conversation (Part III)

I think I am definitely being ignored now. Which kind of frustrates me because presumably the guy is mad about something, and the only reason I was blunt (for me, that was blunt) was because he set the tone. Hohum.

Anyway, I'll just update with this excerpt, which sheds some light on the question of the nature of our friend's belief:

I'll start with atheism. I believe that atheism is illogical but I do believe that it is essentially harmless. Afterall, you don't hear about atheists acting like Muslims and Christians and killing or wanting to kill anyone who doesn't beleive exactly as they believe. In some ways atheist act more like "Christians" than do many self professed Christians. They tend to be less judgemental and their moral compass seems to be less erratic. It is very difficult for free thinkers to muster up the amount of denial it takes to believe in the Bible and the rantings of evangelists.

Judging by my own life and the things I see in the world I would have to say that the Biblical portrayal of god is quite accurate.

The destruction of Jehovah and Allah will happen just like it did to Zarathrustra and the Greek and Roman gods. I am just tryin to speed up the process.

My view of what god is exactly is difficult to explain and I am not sure if words are adequate but I will try.

All the gods exist but they require us to amplify them. The Greek and Roman gods were all nut cases but jehovah is not only a nut case but he is malevolent. Psycholigically god is a sick puppy and praising him only reinforces his egomaniacal power trip.

God is made of several componets of which we are one. The thing is, he needs us inorder to exist. We essentially can pull the plug on his power. I think god knows he is in trouble. I think he knows his days are numbered. Because he is such an jerk he is creating uncertainty in the world as well as war and conflict. This serves god in many ways but mostly it brings him the ego gratification that he cannot survive without.

In many ways god is quite pathetic. I have thought that maybe he could be rehabilitated but if that is to happen he nneds to be weaned from his addiction to souls. The other possibilty is that other non corporeal beings will drive him from power.

I wonder about Satan and I think that Satan was God's offspring but I think what may have really happened is that go d became jealous of him. I think when God made Satan like he created a being that God thought was very much like him. God's perception of himself is grandiose and quite distorted. When Satan turned out to be a big improvement over the vary God who cuaed him to be God like he always does got jealous. Satan not having the same grasp of evil that god has was unprepared for God's sneak attack.

If satan and god are truly mortal enemies why is Satan doing God's work in hell
by torturing souls for all eternity?

According to god I am most certainly destined for hell. If SAtan was indeed treated unfairly by God maybe he will be glad to see me. Somehow I suspect that god and Satan are partners.

Earlier, he wrote:

In a sense I am a Bible literalist for this reason: Even though I know that the entire Bible is BS I chalk all the BS in the Bible to its publisher. I believe that the publisher is almighty god ... I believe that every word in the Bible is essentially the word of god. Which is not to say I think anything in the Bible is true. I know god's word is the word of a cruel, jealous and vengeful being. That is not my opinion cruel, jealous and vengeful are god's own words.

Definitely a Category a) then: Believes in God's existence, but he hates the bastard.

If you want to read more of his views, you can catch up with him here.

Dave


9:59:43 PM    comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 The Grace Pages.
Last update: 01/07/04; 10:59:40.
June 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
May   Jul