November 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Oct   May

Titianblue.JPG

Index to Posts
(by month)

I post everything to this page.
Subscribe or bookmark
individual subjects via the navigator links above.


Stories

If she doesn't want to
have sex with me,
Why Does She Masturbate?

Ten Ways To Be A Lover:
A Man Looks At Romance Novels

Lying and Power

Do Women Prefer Bad Boys?

Fiona's Story:
A Tale of Online Love

How A Nice Guy
Becomes a Dickhead

by "Steve"

ENTIRE STORY LIST


Why Your Wife Won't Have Sex With You:
Introduction
Disgust
Discomfort
Distraction
Insecurity
Anger
Fat Wars
Misunderstanding
Boredom
Infidelity
Technique
Motherhood
Aging and Depression
Bad Company
Childhood Abuse
Counseling
When To Split
Being the Hero of Your Own Life

What I'm Reading Today

Subject To Discussion:


Blogs and Websites



My Categories

The Nine Billion Links of God
Fashion Bashion
Bookmovision
The Ranticore
Temporary Duty: A Novel
Why Your Wife Won't
Have Sex With You




<-- Previous Day    |     Next Day -->


Wednesday, November 17, 2004



Continuing the discussion of Passionate Marriage that started here.

One of the things that impressed me about Schnarch was that he had similar thoughts to mine about the influence of childhood experiences, as he outlines here (my emphasis):

Many marital therapists believe childhood wounds drive marriage, leading us to reenact our family problems with our adult partners. I do not. While I don't ignore unpleasant childhood experiences, I also don't believe they are the only or even the strongest factor shaping a marriage. Childhood wounds have their impact, just like parental modeling and social conditioning. I believe other aspects have at least as much -- if not more -- impact on marriage than our childhood or unconscious processes. ...


Misguided emphasis on childhood wounds does more than send couples off in the wrong direction. The resulting "trauma model of life" ignores everything outstanding about our species' determination to grow and thrive. ...


I'm not proposing that we ignore past events that limit our present efforts. Awakening creative effort, however, requires leaving personal tragedies behind rather than constantly revisiting and revising them. This is neither as difficult nor as undesirable as it might seem. ...


This "non-regressive" approach does not deny the impact of the past -- but you don't necessarily have to go back into the past to resolve it. You can work on the past where it's surfacing in the present. This gives meaning and utility to your current difficulties and provides an active way to work on your present and past simultaneously. ... When working on the past in the present, you're working directly on your current problem, too, so what's of immediate concern to you -- your marriage -- often improves. You don't have to decide from the outset what's causing what.


In other words, don't assume that if your wife would only solve her problems with, say, her rejecting Dad or her overbearing Mom, she'd be able to respond to you the way you want. In fact, deciding that childhood trauma is the main thing that's driving her responses can send you on the motha of all goose chases....Not to mention that this means you're also thinking in terms of "fixing" her to your satisfaction and neglecting what you can do for yourself.

Schnarch has a beef with the conventional wisdom that "problemizes" every pain that life is heir to.

Fifty years ago, child development specialists recognized the importance of infants' drive to bond (attach) to their caregivers. Unfortunately, we've erroneously assumed this is the dominant and overriding drive for children and adults, and popularized the image of infants being helpless and terrified when no one is there to comfort them. We've applied this same image to marriage and concluded our partner is supposed to soothe us and not do things that make us insecure. However, radically new information emerging from infant research over the last decade shows that infants have remarkable resilience and are able to regulate some of their emotional equilibrium by three months of age. ...


We've ignored how taking care of your own feelings is an integral part of maintaining a relationship and how it fuels attachment and selfdirection. We've reduced adults to infants, reduced infants to a frail ghost of their resilience, and reduced marriage to providing safety, security, and compensation for childhood disappointments. In other words, we've eliminated from marriage those things that fuel our essential drives for autonomy and freedom. Common notions of interdependence emphasize our neediness but not our strengths.


There is one dilemma of married life that is just inherent in the couple relationship, and therefore unavoidable even by the most perfectly-matched pair in all creation.

This is partly why my approach to therapy is known as the sexual crucible approach. The name describes how it often feels when marriage's classroom is in session. What's an example of a crucible in marriage? How about the fact that your spouse can always force you to choose between keeping your integrity and staying married, between "holding onto yourself" and holding onto your partner. These integrity issues often surface around sex and intimacy -- about what the two of you will and won't do together. They can just as easily arise over issues about money, parenting, in-laws, and lifestyle. The more emotionally enmeshed you and your spouse are -- fused in my lingo -- the more you will push this choice right down to the wire. Stay in the marriage or get divorced. The key is not to lose your nerve or get overreactive or locked into an inflexible position. I know that's tough when you think your marriage is about to explode -- or you're about to sell out your beliefs, preferences, or dreams. But it's actually part of the people-growing process in marriage.


To illustrate this concept, Schnarch introduces a new couple, Bill and Joan, whose first therapy session starts with explosive emotions:

Bill blurts out his worst fears about their marriage. "We got married for the wrong reasons. I really wasn't ready to get married. I let her push me into it."


Joan, twisted like a pretzel on my couch, immediately adopts a "Don't blame me again for that, it's your fault too!" expression.


For several seconds it's not clear where things are headed. Then I realize tears are streaming down Joan's cheeks. "Damn! I promised myself! wouldn't cry!" she stammers, trying to gain control, "I've. . . I've always known he never chose me. He just didn't want to give me up. I haven't been able to face it."


Bill turns beet red. "I told you I wasn't ready to get married! You know I've always been afraid to make decisions!"


Schnarch eventually tells this couple that, contrary to popular belief, wonderful and lasting relationships can develop from "all the wrong reasons." In fact, it's only after you've been married awhile that you mature enough for the "right" reasons to even exist, and acknowledging and working (Schnarch says "struggling") with the reality of the bad start may be the only way to find the right way to stay together.

We like to believe that "communication problems" underlie most relationship difficulties because we welcome the idea we can literally talk our way out of anything. We love the fantasy that we can "understand" and "express" our way out of our dilemmas.


But this is not what happens. Instead, in unwitting partnership, couples create emotional gridlock. Bill and Joan's relationship was like an intricate Chinese puzzle: one's movement was blocked by the other's equally stymied position. Joan complained that Bill drained her energy by having one crisis after another. Bill was furious that Joan wasn't "supportive." He demanded to be "number one" in her life. She found his neediness unattractive. He became more insecure and accelerated his demands -- until they were trapped by their interlocking frustrating and frustrated needs. ...


After seeing this go on repeatedly in my office -- and my own home -- I've concluded that some dilemmas aren't meant to be "fixed." All problems aren't meant to be "smoothed." The solutions we seek sometimes come from living through them. We spin intricate webs until we have no way around them. We can escape the situation we've created (temporarily), but we can't escape ourselves.


Our self-made crises are custom-tailored, painstakingly crafted, and always fit perfectly. We construct emotional knots until, eventually, we are willing to go through them. It may sound farfetched, but sexual dysfunctions are blessings to couples who use them well. In like fashion, we sometimes create situations that ask us to risk our marriage in order to receive its bounty. Approached in this light, committed relationships become epic dramas of heroism rather than soap operas.


Well, whaddya know? He used the word "heroism" again.

I think he's stealing my stuff.

Next: More on Bill and Joan's Excellent Adventure


Passionate Marriage Discussion: 1 2 3

3:22:58 PM    comments [] trackback []
_________________________



There are a lot of reasons for cutting back on Christmas spending, and not all of them are financial. If you're like me and think that the seasonal frenzy for buying piles and piles of new things is getting way out of hand, spiritually if not necessarily economically, perhaps you'll join us in a "Buy-Less" Christmas this year. "Buy-Less" can mean either buy fewer new things (so that thrift shops, white elephant exchanges and other "recycling" dodges are okay), or, if you want to really challenge yourself, you can make it literally "buyless," not spending any money at all on Christmas things and making merry only with what you already have on hand.

We are, I'm somewhat ashamed to say, well ahead of the Christmas game when it comes to that "already have on hand" bit. So having to make do with that storage closet full of Christmas crap we've accumulated over 26 years really won't be much of a hardship. And since I hate to shop, especially in Christmas crowds, I have little problem staying out of stores where I'd be tempted to pile up the shiny bags. Keeping my mitts off the mountains of CATALOGS that come whooshing into the house every day is another matter entirely.

In the spirit of the concept, I whisked through some of the magazine pages I've scanned for posterity and came up with these three ideas for recycled Christmas decorations. I don't know which magazine (or catalog) they came from originally. I admit they're a bit banal, but they're only here as inspiration anyway.

This one is just a store-bought wire vine trellis set up to showcase Christmas cards and ornaments. My thought was that even if you didn't have the trellis itself, you might be able reshape wire hangers to do something similar. A bit of leftover garden lattice might work the same way.
TrellisXmasCards.jpg

This one is a Christmas tree decorated with chandelier crystals. Now, it's true that most people don't have spare crystals just lying around the house, but it illustrates the idea that you can re-purpose things like old costume jewelry and strings of second-hand beads to decorate a small tree. You can sometimes get insanely fun costume jewelry full of rhinestones, "gold" brass and colored paste gems at thrift stores. I like the bucket-style tree stand here, too. It lifts the tree from the surface of the table so you can put buffet dishes (or presents) under it. You could achieve a similar effect with an ordinary bucket and some aluminum foil or a scrap of embossed wallpaper. Be sure it's heavy enough to keep the tree from toppling over.

We are getting so we like having a smaller tabletop tree in preference to the ridiculously huge evergreens we used to haul into the house (and out again, dropping debris like Pigpen every every inch of the way). In order to get a tree to look right under our high ceilings we always had to get a tall and therefore wide monster that cut down on floor space in the living room, right when we needed it for more people to mill around in.

Although an enormous tree was practically required by law when we had younger kids and Santa came on Christmas Eve to pile the gifts up hip-deep around it, in these latter days, a well-dressed tree -- artificial, no less! -- on the sideboard in the dining room window nook is enough. As a bonus, the family presents that gradually appear around it in the leadup to Christmas Day don't look as lonely and dwarfed (and kind of silly) as they used to.
ChandelierDropXmasTree.jpg

These (below) are candlesticks made out of staircase balusters, 2 of them, each cut into 2 different length pieces, with short candle spikes made from double-ended screws. I'm not a fan of distressed or crackled paint finishes, so I'd dress them up differently, with gold spray paint or something else more elegant if I was making them. But some people enjoy the old-fashioned look because it seems more Warm and Genuine and Homey (even if you have to purposely mess something up to make it look authentically old).

You can do any damn thing you please with the raw materials of this idea. Glue some of that thrift store jewelry's loose gems to your pieces of wood. Squeeze aluminum foil around them. And again, you don't actually have to have spare unfinished wood turnings around the house. You could use a couple of ancient chair legs or even a couple of plain waste blocks of 2X2 lumber (or 4X4 for pedestal candles) in a similar way.
BalusterCandlesticks.jpg


1:46:49 PM    comments [] trackback []
_________________________



<-- Previous Day    |    Next Day -->