Girl in the Locker Room


A barrier-breaking generation gives context to contemporary female life.
(how to contribute your real-life stories/recollections/anecdotes)


January 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Dec   Feb



Home

About Robin Herman

Why This Blog, Why Now?

Story of the Week

Shop Girl in the Locker Room Gear


READERS' STORIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS

 • Dating
 • Fashion
 • Locker Room
 • Heros/Heroines
 • Identity
 • Health
 • Sports
 • Work
 • School
 • Politics
 • The Erotic Life
 • Vocabulary & Expressions
 • Younger People's Stories

Books on My Night Table

 • The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell
 • The Liars' Club, Mary Karr
 • Bliss, Danyel Smith
 • De Kooning:An American Master, Mark Stevens and Annalyn Swan

Girl in the Locker Room Archives

 Postings 2004

Technorati

 



Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author,
Robin Herman:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Saturday, January 14, 2006

Kate Michelman, former president of NARAL, identifies one of the most disturbing aspects of Samuel Alito's testimony and previous rulings -- the lack of any indication that he was concerned with or had a feeling for the impact of his rulings on the lives of real people --- and his non-concern for their personal privacy. The New York Times has this excerpt from Michelman's testimony at the confirmation hearings yesterday:

A woman's right to choose is a powerful manifestation of privacy, but it is one right among many and all of them should concern us. There is no sense in Judge Alito's writings or rulings that privacy is a fundamental constitutional right. In his record, not only are individuals often powerless against the prerogatives of the state, individuals are more often than not simply absent altogether.

In many ways, what Judge Alito has written is less disturbing that what he omits, any sense of how his legal rulings bear on real people whose lives are shaped by his decisions. When he ruled that a Pennsylvania law requiring women to notify their husbands before obtaining an abortion was not, quote, an undue burden, there was no sense that a woman like me ever existed or even mattered. When he wrote that commonly used methods of birth control could be classified as methods of abortion, there was no indication he considered the women who would be forced into unwanted pregnancies.

The Washington Post has this video of Michelman's compelling testimony.

And for one last go-round about Concerned Alumni of Princeton (CAP), the ultra-conservative group that Alito cited as a reference for a job promotion in the Reagan Justice Dept., here's Bruce Reed (Princeton '82) writing in Slate about the grumpy old men's club that CAP was and that the Supreme Court is.

-RH


8:03:07 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2006 Robin Herman. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
The Girl in the Locker Room™ name and design
are trademarks owned by Robin Herman.
Last update: 2/1/2006; 9:09:15 PM.
Powered by

  Girl in the Locker Room!