Girl in the Locker Room


A barrier-breaking generation gives context to contemporary female life.
(how to contribute your real-life stories/recollections/anecdotes)


March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Feb   Apr



Home

About Robin Herman

Why This Blog, Why Now?

Story of the Week

Shop Girl in the Locker Room Gear


READERS' STORIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS

 • Dating
 • Fashion
 • Locker Room
 • Heros/Heroines
 • Identity
 • Health
 • Sports
 • Work
 • School
 • Politics
 • The Erotic Life
 • Vocabulary & Expressions
 • Younger People's Stories

Books on My Night Table

 • Gilead, Marilynne Robinson
 • The Liars' Club, Mary Karr
 • Bliss, Danyel Smith
 • De Kooning:An American Master, Mark Stevens and Annalyn Swan

Girl in the Locker Room Archives

 Postings 2004
 Postings 2005

Technorati

 



Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author,
Robin Herman:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Sunday, March 05, 2006

In today's Washington Post, William Saletan takes a practical look at Roe v. Wade as it seems headed for the Supreme Court thanks to the South Dakota situation and others. He offers a kind of post-modern technology strategy. Here's the crux:

Roe established a right to abortion through the end of the second trimester. The latter part of that time frame has always been the most controversial. Improvements in neonatal care have made fetuses viable--capable of surviving delivery--earlier than was possible in 1973. That's why Justice O'Connor said Roe was "on a collision course with itself" and eventually led her colleagues to abandon the trimester framework. Meanwhile, sonograms and embryology have made people aware of how well developed fetuses are while still legally vulnerable to abortion. We even do surgery on fetuses now, which makes aborting them seem that much more perverse. These developments may explain, in part, why two-thirds of Americans think abortion should be illegal in the second trimester--and why anti-abortion activists targeted partial-birth abortions for legislative assault.

 

But if medical technology has helped to expose this moral problem, it can also help us solve it. Second-trimester abortions are becoming not just harder to stomach, but easier to avoid. In 1973, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, fewer than 40 percent of abortions took place before the ninth week of gestation. By 2000, the latest year for which data have been analyzed, the percentage was nearly 60 and rising. The same high-resolution ultrasound that makes you queasy about aborting a 12-week fetus has made it safer to perform abortions at four or five weeks instead of waiting, as women were once routinely told to do. In 1993, only 7 percent of abortion providers could end a pregnancy at four weeks or earlier; by 2001, 37 percent could do it. And by 2002, two-thirds of clinics belonging to the National Abortion Federation were offering pills that abort pregnancies in the first seven weeks.

Saletan also catches us up on the latest advances in injectable and implantable contraception that will obviate the abortion dilemma from the most defendable ground.

Worth examining where on the timeline/moral line of abortion you stand. I still see a need for the possibility of second trimester abortion. Circumstances and foresight among couples will never be absolute and perfect.

-RH


8:04:23 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2006 Robin Herman. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
The Girl in the Locker Room™ name and design
are trademarks owned by Robin Herman.
Last update: 4/1/2006; 9:38:31 PM.
Powered by

  Girl in the Locker Room!