Versus.
How wrong is the Right? Let me count the ways.




















Subscribe to "Versus." in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

 

Saturday, September 10, 2005
 

 

Hi!  I have changed my address.  To jump to the current version of this post, click here.

 

 

Deliver us, Bill Maher

 

 

In the ages when speaking truth to the king was considered  treason, that job has always fallen to the jesters.   Under the cap and bells he likes to remind us he is wearing, Bill Maher is and has been one of the bravest men in America---and he is certainly the funniest.  

 

Real Time 9-9 (link)

 

                Angry laughter is sometimes not just the best medicine, but the only medicine.  When laughter breaks through the numbness, the rage, shame and other damaging emotions that have been paralyzing you come out with it.  When you’re crying and gasping from the mixture, the blinkers fall from your eyes, the yoke drops off from around your neck, and you can stand up and see clearly again.  It’s not just cathartic, but liberating. 

 

                Bill Maher delivers blow after blow to the worst evils and hypocrisies of our time, and he does it  with grace. He uses wit  to unhorse his opponents and they always go down.   But he does it charmingly.  He does it humbly.   He does it with a deprecating lowering of the head and with a self-deprecating “Don’t mind me; I’m only a comedian!” chuckle.  Only rarely---last night was one such occasion---does he drop the jester's mask and let his anger and his distaste shine through. 

 

                In the aftermath of Katrina, the press seems to have grown back the balls they collectively lost in the wake of 9-11.  (As Bill Maher said last week on Real Time, finally).  But during the long dry spell when they seemed to be nothing more than silent enablers, Bill Maher---who is a libertarian, not a Democrat or a liberal (his previous show was called Politically Incorrect)---was one of the few who were willing to stand up and speak the truth to power.  (I suppose it's fitting that in these days, when the supporters of the Administration are claiming for it exemptions from criticism that are traditionally accorded to kings, that only the country's jesters have dared to to challenge them).

 

                He is not cowed by anyone  He is apparently unfraid of the networks, the press, the Administration, or anyone else.  He is not fooled by sophistry or beguiled by the most adroit side-stepping, fencing, feinting, or faking.   His wit is a needle, a lancet, a lance, a shield, a crossbow, and a blunt instrument.  The motley and the bells are a likable disguise he uses to disarm the opposition so they don't notice the ammunition he is carrying. 

 

                He reminds me more than anyone else in my time of the great and irate Samuel Clemens, who also used comic derision as a mask for his rage, and who---despite his surface misanthropy----was deeply and furiously moved by the oppression of the weak and the sufferings of the poor. . 

 

                So I honor Maher for his courage,  for his laughter, and most of all, for his plain-spoken rage.  Last night, watching Real Time, I felt a cathartic joy when he said what I actually feel:  That it’s the duty of all to come to the aid of the poor now, and we all get that, but that we are capable of helping while still calling those who should hold themselves accountable to account. 

 

                As cathartics do, the angry laughter that ensued purged and clarified my own thinking. 

 

                We live in a democratic society.  Our leaders are our agents.  They represent us.  They are us.  To hold them accountable in a disaster on this scale is the only way to hold ourselves accountable  If the government of the United States is not accountable to the American people, who is?  If this Administration won’t acknowledge even partial responsibility for the aftermath of this disaster, when will they ever?  The answer is:  That they will never accept it, they will never see themselves as accountable, and they will never admit responsibility.  And until they do, we can’t either.  It’s their duty to do that for the rest of us, even if it hurts, even if it makes us all ashamed.  Only shame can bring any lasting good out of this disaster.  Without that, we’ll just patch it over and make the same mistakes all over again. 

 

                During Real Time I was overjoyed to hear Maher make the point that it is irrelevant whether the President is to blame for the hurricane; he is still accountable for what happened afterward.  (The only constraint on my angry delight was that nobody mentioned the levees; I kept saying, “The levees, Bill!  Say something about the levees!” till my husband quietly asked me to stop).  To see him drop his pleasantly ironic mask (though only briefly) and reveal some of the same anger and the grief that I was holding pent up inside me was cathartic, painful, and healing.  Before a suppurating wound can heal, there's the messy and nasty business of lancing it. 

 

              To hear him acknowledge feeling shame, to have say that shame is the legitimate response to the aftermath of this disaster, was liberating.  So that’s what this sick feeling is---this heavy, numbing, sickening nausea---shame.  It’s the one emotion no American can tolerate.  It’s the emotion you feel when you glance in the mirror, find that someone’s scraped off the protective vaseline coating,  and see what you really look like.  If you don’t alter the mirror, the only remedy is to change the thing that is being reflected there and that is very hard work. 

 

                Despite all the cant from the Right about ‘individual responsibility,’ there is precious little of that in evidence at present.  Instead, we see our leaders engaged in the unseemly (and utterly transparent) effort to identify one or more scapegoats they can drive off into the desert so that the mob will stop whinging for an accounting.  Somebody has to tell them that we’re not as stupid as they assume, and that no tidal wave of rhetoric is going to be able to wash away our pain at the loss of this city and so many of our people.

 

                And to have him make the point that it is quite possible to help the sufferings of the poor while still calling the government to account gave me the sweet relief you get when a pious  rejoinder to justified outrage finally receives a  just (and justly mocking) response.  Yes, we should ‘concentrate’ on helping the victims, but to ensure that there are no further victims, we absolutely must demand an explanation, accountability, and a  different plan for the future.  As our representatives, they owe it to us.  And though President Bush has never acted as if this were the case, he is not president only to the people who actually voted for him, but to those who didn’t, including Bill Maher and me. 

 

                I’m a person who hates confrontation and who always listens to excuses.  I believe in forgiving people for mistakes and for mistakes in their thinking.  I’m a soft, wimpy, turning-the-other-cheek liberal. I think people can be redeemed and I believe that those who wish it can be rehabilitated, but not until the person acknowledges responsibility, feels shame, and undertakes to change.   In short, I'm a typical soppy liberal---the sort of liberal despised and reviled by Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh.  Nonjudgmental, unsure of my righteousness, unsure even what righteousness means.  I need someone who isn't held back by liberal diffidence to speak to my genteelly suppressed rage.

                

                So, deliver us all, Sir.Bill from this toxic numbness, apathy, and shock.  Make us feel our anger and our shame.  Nothing else can release us. 

 

                In other words:  Dude, you rock. 

 

 

RELATED LINKS

 

An Interview with Bill Maher;   Republican “Humor” at the Expense of a Veteran White House Reporter

Don’t Put Out More Flags (A Reprise!)

Suffering Fools Gladly:  The Consolation of Mockery

Oh, I kid Bill Maher, sort of.

Deliver Us, Bill Maher!  +  Heroes’ Corner:  Bill Maher, George Clooney, & Edward R. Murrow

 

 

Image drawn by Mr. Tenniel; painted by Damozel!

 


2:53:04 PM    So you say!  []

 

.

 

Hi!  I've changed my address.  To jump to the current version of this post, click this link.

 

Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Dogs of War!

 

The Sayings of Ann Coulter

 

Res ipsa loquitur

 

                The author of  the Kendallball.net blog is one of the Harding University alumni who by matter of factly  pointing out that Coulter’s message isn’t exactly consistent with Christ’s apparently helped bring about Harding’s cancellation of her engagement to speak there as part of its “Distinguished Lecturer Series.”  (The Harding cancellation is discussed here in “Calling Off Ann Coulter,” at  Inside Higher Ed.)   In the Kendallball.net blog, in a response to the author's original posting, I found a link to an entertaining and informative article in The Washington Monthly entitled “The Wisdom of Ann Coulter.”  For a sampler of her sayings, please click on that link.  I promise you, they are choice. 

 

 The Inside Higher Ed article described Ann Coulter’s rhetoric as provocative and sometimes bombastic.”  That’s certainly one way of describing it. I'd go for ‘intemperate and frequently childish.”  But “Yip!  Yip!  Yip!  Grrrrrr” would also do. 

 

 Seriously, how could anyone hear or read this stuff without falling over laughing?  I mean, I take it she’s serious---deadly serious---and that she apparently wants people like me to choke on the vomit some of this is clearly meant to induce, but….is she serious?  It seems as if she is.  Am I reading it wrong?

 

I honestly don't know how to take her rhetoric.  I’m a mere soft, soppy liberal, a bleeding-heart left-leaning spineless arty-farty Christian ivory tower-dwelling geek.  I’m middle-aged, diffident, and ordinary.  If I weren't those things, I might call her a gaunt attention-begging media-created harpy without humility, humor, or decorum through which to filter her seemingly inexhaustible rage. But I am middle-aged, spineless, non-famous, and ordinary-looking, so as I was saying, what's my opinion of her worth?  And anyway, to say something so vicious is really against my principles.  Having said or implied it I am already feeling remorseful and ashamed.  Unlike La Belle Dame sans Merci, I think that ad hominem attacks are not only crude, but  transparently fallacious. 

 

It's not that I believe that our right wing brethren can't amuse.   I have always loved the writings of P.J. O'Rourke, that lovable curmudgeon of a Republican Party Reptile, and I basically  have a soft spot for any and all those who are adroit enough to deliver a sting or even a blunt blow by the skillful deployment of words; I still sometimes read, though with growing impatience, writings penned by Christopher Hitchens and Florence King.   But those people are writers

 

I've dipped into her diatribes and I admit I can't follow the logic.  Perhaps there isn't any.  Or perhps they are in some sort of secret Code--the Coulter Code?  If so, I suppose that  only people who join her clubhouse are allowed to have the top-secret fluorescent pink plastic decoder ring.     

 

Or---it's possible---perhaps she is  trying to be witty.   If so, her wit is too subtle for my inferior liberal brain to comprehend.  It seems to me that no one with an actual grain of humor, for example, could say the things attributed to her in the above-linked article with a straight face, but it also seems to me that she intends to be taken seriously.  Am I just not getting her?  When I saw her on Real Time with Bill Maher, she seemed to be literally quivering with Right-eous wrath.  It was funny all right, though not because she intended  it to be.  But again, what does a poor liberal know about the techniques of the subtle humorists of the Very Far Right?  No doubt Bill understands them, but I do not. 

 

If I were George W. Bush, I’d want a word with her about this quote attributed to her in The Washington Monthly article:

"The thing I like about Bush is I think he hates liberals."---Washington Post 8/1/00

You know, I don’t think he does, actually.  I don’t think he is a person who is primarily motivated by rage, fear, and hatred.  He’s not a misanthrope and I don’t actually believe he is a coward.

 

                Coulter has appointed herself Grand Inquisitor of Patriotism and the Supreme Arbiter of  Treasonous Beliefs.   No role could be more un-American (or---incidentally---un-Christian, though I don’t suppose she cares about that).  The founding fathers weren’t cowards who feared dissent or opposition.  They knew that maintaining a free society requires courage.  It requires that you be able to deal with dissent.   

 

To designate your fellow Americans ‘traitors’---on the strength of a mere political affiliation or set up beliefs about the role of government that  differ from yours---is un-American. It is certainly consistent with the approach of other regimes in other places and times, but for an American, it is fundamentally unpatriotic. 

 

But don’t get me wrong.   I am all for Ann Coulter for the same reason I am all for Rush Limbaugh.  When these two launch into their diatribes, flinging vitriol into the faces of all those who dare to disagree with their views,  they do more in the long term to discredit than any liberal ever could to damage and discredit the position of  the extreme ‘Right.’   In the backlash that’s bound to come, the more tempered rebuttals of conservatives whom one might be inclined to take seriously are going to get buried in the flood of hate-mongering rhetoric being spewed by their bedfellows.  In the words of an English friend, they end up sounding 'barking mad'---in both the English and the American sense of 'mad.'

 

So yip on, AC!  Every yip further undermines the moral and political credibility of the views you espouse.    

 

The same friend remarked, “If this Coulter been born here, she’d have ended up doing her tedious rants in some dark corner of her local.  People would buy her drinks just for a laugh and to wind her up, but she wouldn’t be appearing on any talk shows.  Only in 'the land of the free' would someone who thinks everyone who disagrees with her extreme beliefs is a traitor be accorded her sort of status.  You Americans are extraordinary."   Yes, exactly.

 

 

RELATED POSTINGS

 

An Interview with Bill Maher; Republican “Humor” at the Expense of a Veteran White House Reporter

Coulter Out-Coultered, or Thank God I’m a Democrat, Some More

Melanie Morgan and Ann Coulter Throw Down over How to Execute the Latest “Traitor”

Susan Estrich on Ann Coulter:  Sympathy for the Mean Girl.

Secret Left-Wing Coulterphiles Alert:  Coulter “Praises” Senator Lieberman

Christianity, “Christianity,” and Ann Coulter

Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Dogs of War!—The Sayings of Ann Coulter

Overturn the Constitution in the Name of the Lord!

Wendy McElroy, Stop Making Sense!  Oh, wait.

I Know You Are, but What Am I?

Suffering Fools Gladly:  The Consolation of Mockery

I Don’t Like You Either [scroll down for 'strident' text]

 

 

 IMAGE DRAWN BY MR. TENNIEL; PAINTED BY DAMOZEL!


12:23:32 AM    So you say!  []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Damozel.
Last update: 8/25/2006; 1:07:54 AM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.
September 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Aug   Jun