THE LIBERAL PERSPECTIVE/Joe Sheridan's Radio Weblog
A new and dynamic point of view from an experienced and articulate Liberal Voice
Last updated:
9/4/2008; 5:51:14 PM


September 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Aug   Oct

Home


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "THE LIBERAL PERSPECTIVE/Joe Sheridan's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Joseph A. Sheridan:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Thursday, September 04, 2008

KAY CATLIN WRITES AN OP-ED PIECE FOR THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE—A HILLARY SUPPORTER WHO INSISTS SHE WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN

 

I picked up the Chicago Tribune, Saturday, August 30, 2008, and found an op-ed piece written by Pat Catlin of St. Charles, Illinois. I picked up the phone and called Pat. We had a very amiable conversation that included all of the important questions relative to a Hillary supporter who does not support Barack Obama after Hillary so passionately called for her supporters to do as she has done and support Obama as ardently as she is.

Kay, who is a compassionate woman and definitely not a racist still has concerns about Obama’s preparedness to be president.  When asked, she responded without hesitation that she was not a racist which she immediately validated by telling me that one of her children is married to an African-American.

I asked how she could vote for a man who opposes everything that Hillary stands for; she simply was not concerned about the issues. That McCain opposes abortion along with his new presumptive vice-presidential candidate even in the case of rape and incest did not phase her although she is pro-choice.

That Sarah Palin, McCain’s Veep choice’s only experience in foreign affairs, according to Cindy McCain, is that her state is adjacent to Russia; Holy Mary Mother of God. Kay did not care whether she had foreign affairs experience

She expressed her disappointment that Hillary and her campaign staff “ran such a poor campaign.” On this point, Kay hit the nail squarely on the nail.  Hillary and her incompetent campaign advisors, decided to ignore the caucus states which, in the end, cost her the nomination. And while Kay did not say this, Hillary came into this campaign as arrogant as any candidate I have ever seen. She told people all over the country that she would have the nomination in the bag by the Super Tuesday Primary in February, 2008. So confident was she and those around her that she would win, they did not raise money for the primaries that followed Super-Tuesday.  That was a fatal error. In fact, to be honest, that was arrogant! Someone gave her the idea that the she was heir apparent, that she was destined, that she deserved the nomination and that she would have the nomination simply by running.

Hillary and her people did not expect such a powerful candidate as Barack Obama to show up for the primary battle with all the money he had raised over the internet and with all of the power of his oratory. To the electorate, Hillary was more of the same old thing. They had enough of her husband’s oral sex in the oval office. They had had enough of the months of Special Prosecutors and the lack of progress made during the investigation on issues that mattered to them. In spite of Bill’s lasciviousness, the people overwhelmingly still found him to be an effective president. Sixty percent of the American people love Bill Clinton. But huge numbers in Congress still have not forgiven Hillary for the way she handled the health care she tried to cram through Congress. The word is that she so angered so many of her friends as well as her enemies that she seriously botched the one opportunity they had to pass health care in that decade.

Unfortunately, Hillary has a large contingent who cannot tolerate her. She appears too arrogant, too mighty, and too aloof and a large segment of both the Democratic and Republican Party would not vote for her if she could walk on water. Many members of my family fit into that category.

While all along I had placed bets on Hillary, my son was sold on Barack, and my wife said she could not tolerate Hillary. Although I had contributed money to Hillary, in the middle of the primary season when she and her campaign staff turned out to be mean and divisive, I threw my support to Obama. In fact, my wife and I attended a rally for a young woman who was running to unseat Phil Crane who had been feeding at the public trough for over 30 years and just in the previous year had taken fifty-eight (58) trips sponsored by his special interest contributors, Obama was the speaker at an 11:00 am rally on Monday morning for Congressional candidate Melissa Bean. They did not expect a spectacular crowd for a week-day event. When we arrived, the parking lot was full and by the time the rally started, people were jamming into the field house. When he spoke, he captured the imagination of everyone who attended. His oratory was more than grand utterances, he was addressing the issues that deeply concerned most of his audience, and I was sold and immediately changed my support to Barack Obama who was by far the most forceful candidate for public office I have seen since JFK.

Returning to my interview, I asked Kay every question I could think of to change her mindset, but in the end she was still voting for John McCain because he had actually done something in the name of his country.

I did not tell her during the interview, but I find it insane for a supporter of Hillary Clinton to support John McCain—I do not care what he did over thirty years ago. But then, there is a difference in the male and female view of the world. After eight years of George W. Bush I would not vote for McCain even if he were not seventy two years old and made a gargantuan mistake in his first act has the presumptive candidate of the Republican Party for president by choosing a vice presidential running mate who has the experience of praying mantis who walks around in circles until he dies from hunger.

I won’t vote for John McCain for the following reasons at the very least:

·        I want the war in Iraq over and McCain raised in the Military mind-set by his father and his exclusively training only knows how to salute to those in command and say “Aye, Aye, Sir!”

·        McCain is anti-choice as is his running mate. Abortion is a matter of faith not a matter of law and everyone should be free to practice their own brand of religion in this land where freedom of religion is a trademark of our nation.

·        McCain has endorsed George W. Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy, it was that tax cut along with the war in Iraq that has placed this country in a deficit of $1 trillion since Bush took office.

·        He is willing to spend $10 billion dollars a month on a war we will never win for the simple reason that the battle has been won, and the only things left to do are political matters over which we have no control.

·        McCain is opposed to stem cell research which I think is the most important scientific investigation we can undertake.

·        His temperament is unsuited as witnessed by hundreds of military people who have been victims of his violent rage.

·        He married a $100 million heiress after divorcing his wife while she was dying of cancer.

·        He voted against the bill that would ensure that our troops were properly rotated, provided with adequate protection both in their uniforms and their equipment.

·        He voted against the bill that would insure wounded troops returning from the war would have appropriate medical treatment in appropriate facilities.

·        He is opposed to universal health insurance and care which must be number one on the next president’s agenda.

·        He is seventy-two years old and has had numerous stints of cancer. With that in mind, he selects a woman with absolutely no experience in running government on the national level as his vice-president and the next inline to be president should the president be unable to perform his duties.

·        He is too old to run for office. I am seventy-one and I know.

·        Both McCain and Palin endorse everything the NRA proposes. I have no problems with guns for hunters, and personal use, but I want someone who will insure that every gun buyers is vetted and is neither mentally ill nor a criminal. There is no excuse for high powered weapons such as AK-47’s and Oozies on the streets of our cities in the hands of teenagers and others unfit to own or handle a weapon made for war

·        McCain and Palin (and Bush) oppose sex education in high schools where the most sexually active members of our society are launching out on their first experience with their bodies in it’s a hyper-intensive mode. There are too many young men and women having sex without a full understanding of the implications of pregnancy, birth and especially child rearing (parenting), not to mention the myriad of sexually transmitted diseases.

·         Etc. etc. etc.

 

 

Today, I received a video that included statements from a graduate of the Naval Academy who not went to school with McCain, but was also a prisoner of war in the Hanoi Hilton with him. First, he was personally exposed to McCain volatile disposition and suggests that he would not of McCain’s temperament with his hand on the button that could initiate a war. He also expressed concerned that McCain’s blusterous words would not make for good diplomatic negotiation, especially since he would rather fight than talk.

Your criticism of Biden’s words that “America doesn’t need a soldier, what we need is a wise leader,” in my opinion is totally misplaced. McCain is trying to run on his military record and his time spent as a prisoner of war. As General Wesley Clark has correctly stated, “Getting shot down and captured by the enemy does not make you ready to be the commander-in-chief.” Clark went on to say that there 600 more officers and pilots who were also exposed to the same treatment McCain received and they do not feel the experience prepared them to be president.

I sincerely do not understand what value “being a maverick” has when it comes to running this country. No president can run the country without have the support of the Congress who controls the budget and approves the policies the president proposes. What we need is a president like Bill Clinton or FDR and JFK who can persuade members of Congress to do what is right for the country. There have been few presidents, if any, as persuasive as Barack Obama. Witness Caroline Kennedy’s testimony that she has been waiting for a presidential candidate who had the charisma of her father and she found him in Barack Obama.

Kay, you made another error. Obama has worked with Dick Lugar of Indiana on the Senate’s experts in foreign affairs “to pass legislation that expanded efforts to intercept illegal shipments of weapons of mass destruction and to help destroy conventional weapons stockpiles,” according to Jim Kuhnhenn with the Associated Press.

Obama was the point man on legislation in the State Legislature to “study racial profiling by police and requiring recordings of interrogations in potential death cases. He also, successfully co-sponsored major ethics reform legislation which put a fence around the extravagant spending by lobbyists who were attempting to votes and thus power in the halls of our legislative body.

Pat, you do yourself and in the end the country a disservice by not watching the entirely of the Obama acceptance speech. It was, perhaps, the greatest acceptance speech ever delivered by any presidential nominee of either party.

John McCain was a good soldier, but with his endorsements of nearly all of George W. Bush’s failed policies on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the gargantuan deficit, tax cuts for the top one (1) percent of the electorate, refusal to pass universal health insurance, unwillingness to vote for  a bill providing insurance for children in families in the marginal income bracket, his stand against abortion even for rape and incest, his opposition to the use of federal funds for sex education in schools that teaches anything but abstinence, is approval of teaching creationism/intelligent design  in the science curriculum, his support of Supreme Court nominees similar to Scalia and Thomas, no interest in rebuilding our perilously deteriorating infra-structure and on and on and on—disqualifies him to be president of this country. I will not vote for four more years of Bush or anyone who resembles him.

His lack of judgment was eloquently expressed last week with the selection of Sarah Palin—a woman with so little knowledge of the federal government it could be placed on a match cover.

It is seldom in our history that we have the opportunity to elect a man to the presidency with the intelligence, the judgment, the compassion, the experience in the ghettos of our cities like Barack Obama.

Kay Catlin, your concern is misplaced. You should be more concerned about McCain who has the military mind-set that scares the hell out of me and a lack of interest for critical matters on the domestic front.

With our infrastructure on the verge of collapse, our mortgage crisis that could ruin the entire economy of the country if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should fail, the price of health care and insurance bankrupting thousands of families each year and causing over 125,000 to die for lack of services, the loss of jobs fleeing the U. S. for cheaper labor markets and the near demise of our educational system that is cheating millions of our young from obtaining the education they are promised in the constitution of nearly every state, we cannot choose a man who is part of the problem, who was part of the failed polices of the eight years of George W. Bush.

Over 35 years ago, John McCain was a war hero, but he lacks the wisdom and the judgment to attack the monumental problems we face today. We need change and we need it beginning in January, 2009.

 

 

 

 

 


5:29:12 PM    comment []

Monday, September 01, 2008

PALIN IS A BAD CHOICE AND  AN EMPTY SUIT OR IN THIS CASE--DRESS

 

EIGHT (8) YEARS AS A MAYOR OF WASILLA, ALASKA-POPULATON 5470, SHE WAS SWORN INTO OFFICE TWENTY (20) MONTHS AGO AS GOVERNOR

 

FOR THE REPUBLICANS, HER BIGGEST ASSET IS THAT SHE IS “HOT”—A FORMER BEAUTY QUEEN WHO CAME IN SECOND IN THE MISS ALASKA COMPETITION

 

ADDENDUM

 

Gov. Palin announced today that her seventeen year old daughter is pregnant and if all indications she has been pregnant for five months. One wonders if McCain knew about this pregnancy prior to his introduction of Sarah Palin as his running mate since all reports indicate that he had only met with her one time and talked with her on one other occasion.

 

It is difficult to believe that a forty-four year old woman, who is Governor of a state, however small, could give birth to a baby with Down’s syndrome, deal with the fact that her son will ship off to Iraq this year and discover that her young unwed seventeen year old daughter was five months pregnant would even consider taking on the added job of campaigning endlessly for the next two months for the second highest office in the land.

 

Every Democrat, Republican and pundit should express their support for the young woman by giving her the privacy that a pregnant woman requires and support her by keeping her name out of the headlines and the crush of political activity.

 

THIS IS AN INDICTMENT OF JOHN MCCAIN'S JUDGMENT IF THERE EVER WAS ONE. TO SELECT A PERSON WHO HAS NO IDEA OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS (WHO DID NOT OWN A PASSPORT UNTIL TWO YEARS AGO), TO INTERVIEW A CANDIDATE FOR THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT JOB IN OUR GOVERNMENT ONCE IS AN INSULT TO HIS CONSTITUENTS AND MORE IMPORTANT TO THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE NATION SHOULD ANYTHING HAPPEN TO THE PRESIDENT

 

       If beauty and personality were the only qualifications for the office of Vice President, Sarah Palin would probably have been a good choice, but there is a hell of a lot more to the office than checking into the health of the president every morning and presiding over the Senate.

 

 

A person who is one heart beat away from the presidency needs to be prepared to step into that position, especially when the president is seventy-two years old and has had numerous bouts with cancer.

John McCain has placed this country in jeopardy if by some chance he happens to get elected president and then dies or is assassinated or becomes incapacitated because of his propensity toward cancer. This is a vice presidential chance we can not take.

Serving 10 years in local government in a city of 5470 people is not exactly applicable experience. Adding to her resume, she has been governor of a state with a population of 670,000 people for twenty (20) months (She was sworn in December 4, 2006).

The Republicans continue to whine about the lack of experience of Barack Obama. Years of service is not the question, the question in the quality of service dealing with the issues any president must confront?

While time served is not the critical issue in this campaign, the most intriguing comparison is the time that Obama spent in pubic service prior to his run for the presidency and the time, perhaps our greatest president to date spent in public service prior to his run for the “White House:

 

          ABRAHAM LINCOLN:

                  

THE ONLY EDUCATION HE HAD WAS THAT WHICH HE PICKED UP BECAUSE OF HIS VORATIOUS READING. HE WOULD TRAVEL LONG DISTANCES TO BORROW BOOKS

 

AS WAS USUAL IN THOSE DAYS, HE LEARNED LAW AS AN APPRENTICE OF A PRACTICING LAWYER AND LATER BECAME HIS PARTNER

 

 

          BARACK OBAMA;

 

              HE SPENT TWO YEARS IN A MUSLIM SCHOOL

THEN TRANSFERRED AND SPENT TWO YEARS IN A CATHOLIC SCHOOL

 

HE GRADUATED FROM COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY WITH A B.A.

 

HE GRADUATED WITH A LAW DEGREE FROM HARVARD UNIVERSITY AND WAS THE FIRST AFRICAN AMERICAN TO BE ELECTED AS PRESIDENT OF THE PRETIGIOUS HARVARD LAW REVIEW.

         

          SARAH PALIN:

 

              SHE GRADUATED FROM WASILLA HIGH

 

RECEIVING AN ATHLETIC SCHOLARSHIP, SHE GRADUATED FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO IN COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM.

 

 

 

A COMPARISON OF THE EXPERIENCE BETWEEN OBAMA, LINCOLN AND PALIN:

 

          ABRAHAM LINCOLN:

 

·        HE WAS ELECTED TO FOUR TERMS IN THE ILLINOIS GENERAL ASSEMBLY.

 

·        HE SERVED A TWO (2) YEAR TERM IN THE U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

 

 

          BARACK OBAMA:

 

·        HE WAS ELECTED TO ILLINOIS STATE SENATE FOR EIGHT YEARS.

 

·        HE IS SERVING HIS FOURTH YEAR IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE AS A MEMBER OF THE SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE AND THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY.

 

 

          SARAH PALIN:

 

·        SHE SERVED 10 YEARS ON THE CITY COUNCIL OF WASILLA, ALASKA, A TOWN OF 5470 PEOPLE.

 

·        SHE HAS SERVED TWENTY (20) MONTHS AS GOVERNOR OF ALASKA, A STATE OF 670,000. PEOPLE.

 

My real consternation of Palin is her 18th century thinking on issues from the environment and global warming where she insists that there is no such thing as man made pollution, to her insistence on teaching creationism in the schools along side evolution in the science curriculum, to her position that would not allow abortion under any circumstance including rape and incest. That is archaic thinking and while it coincides with McCain is still out of step with the vast majority of Americans

 

This woman could well be a disaster as president should that unfortunate circumstance occur, but more importantly she is in no way prepared to take on the more complex problems confronting the world now.

“Cute” and “hot” are not qualifications for the presidency of the United States of America. A good personality, while preferable, is not a prerequisite and is in no way a reason for voting a person into office. It is part and partial of the same nonsense that less exacting voters who vote for someone simply because they could sit down with them and enjoy a beer. What in the name of everything good does a voter need to sit down with a candidate and feel comfortable enough to drink a beer have to do with his or her capacity for running the country? Americans need to grow up about how and why they vote.

There are times when I feel that we have some of the most absurdly one-dimensional voters in the whole world. George W. Bush won the contest for feeling comfortable enough to have a beer and, in the end, proved once and for all that that qualification is one of the stupidest measures anybody could use to decide for whom to vote.

The important quality necessary for a great president is superior judgment. Without judgment experience is nothing more than “sounding brass and clanging symbol.” i. e .in other words tons of experience without an ounce of judgment is worthless. In the George W. Bush administration we had men with some of the finest experience of any modern day government.

There is Dick Cheney who served as Vice President, U. S. Secretary of Defense under George H. W. Bush, U. S. House minority whip, U. S. House of Representative from Wyoming-at-Large, and White House Chief of Staff under President Gerald Ford.

Donald Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense in the George W. Bush, Secretary of Defense under Gerald Ford, Chief of Staff in the office of President Gerald Ford, and was elected to the U. S. House of Representatives from the 13th District of Illinois. When he dig even further you find the years of experience of Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and dozens more with years of experience in both the executive branch,  department of defense, state, treasury, etc.

And just take a look at what all of this experience did for America. All the way from Iraq, to Katrina, to the corruption that permeates every department of the Bush administration from huge tax breaks to the very rich, to failure to provide our troops with sufficient armored vehicles to protect them from I. E. D.’s and on and on and on.

We needs people with the judgment, the moral underpinning to not only make judgments for the welfare of all Americans, but to make the right decisions.

We are told the John McCain met with Sarah Palin ONCE and talked with her on the phone again. People applying for jobs as janitors are interviewed more than once. McCain insulted the constituency of the United States by placing this nation in the hands of a nice, cute woman with tissue thin experience should the oldest man to ever run for the presidency should die.

In short, Palin is a lovely lady with a marvelous personality whose resume is so thin it fits well on tissue paper. This nation cannot be fooled by the religious right who are so overjoyed to have someone who will back their foolish belief in “intelligent design” or to put it correctly, “creationism,” who are violently opposed to abortion even in the cases of rape and incest, and are married to the obvious false conviction that global warming is in no way caused by human beings, that the truly critical issues are ignored.

We cannot afford to have voters who pay no attention to the war in Iraq, terrorism, the Middle Eastern quandary, the vacillations of Russia, the growth of China’s reach for power, the world economic fluctuations, Iran’s defiance of the larger world in their attempt to become a nuclear power, the economics of the housing market and the number of foreclosures, the jobless rate and the decline in American jobs, the steady rise in medical costs and the insurance necessary to meet those increases i.e. people who are single issue voters (abortion, etc) are a danger to our national security. We must have voters and leaders who know and understand the broader agenda of problems facing our nation in this crucial time.

IT IS BARACK OBAMA WHO HAS THE INTELLIGENCE, THE KNOWLEDGE, THE JUDGMENT, AND THE COURAGE TO ACT WHEN A SEVERE CRISIS ARISES.

It is not that the president must be an expert in all of these areas of crisis; it is that the president must have the good judgment to select the best people in the country and have the persuasiveness to convince those people to come to work for his government.  Judgment is the crucial agent for change and progress. In the selection of Sarah Palin for the vice presidency of the United States and the next in line for the presidency, John McCain has demonstrated, without a doubt, that he does not possess that judgment. 

 

         

 

                  

 

 

 


 [J1]


2:13:33 PM    comment []

Friday, August 29, 2008

BARACK  OBAMA’S ACCEPTANCE SPEECH WAS ABSOLUTELY FLAWLESS

 

HE PUT THE MEAT ON THE SKELETON OF HIS PLATFORM AND ANSWERED EACH CHARGE LEVELED AGAINST HIM BY THE REPUBLICANS AND MCCAIN WITH POWER AND GRACE

 

OBAMA IS THE FINEST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT THIS NATION HAS HAD SINCE JFK AND I BELIEVE HE WILL DEFEAT MCCAIN IN NOVEMBER SOUNDLY!

 

It may well have been the most superbly written and delivered acceptance speech of all times.

Obama not only defined himself clearly and unequivocally, but, more importantly, he answered the one question that has lingered over his candidacy since first he announced his intention to run for the presidency 18 months ago from the steps of the old state capital building in Springfield, Illinois where Abraham Lincoln also announced his intention to become the first presidential contender of the newly formed Republican Party—what will be do if he is elected president. What changes will he bring about?

It should be noted by his contemporary Republican candidate for president, John McCain, that prior to becoming president and ultimately perhaps the greatest president in our history, that Lincoln was a lawyer, served one term in the U. S. Congress and four terms in the Illinois legislature. In other words, one of America’s greatest presidents had much less experience than Barack Obama who served eight years in the Illinois Senate and four years in the U. S. Senate where he has been a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs.

Obama’s speech filled in the blanks on his resume. He was very specific about what he would do. In fact, according to those who have seen the speech identified four (4) pages of “I will do’s” that expressly spelled out the policy he would pursue and the problems he would attack.

Read for yourself what the brilliant wording of his acceptance speech contained and while that speech like all speeches are best understood when delivered by a inspired orator, you will be able to capture the content of his character.

 

Barack Obama: To Chairman Dean and my great friend Dick Durbin; and to all my fellow citizens of this great nation.

With profound gratitude and great humility, I accept your nomination for the presidency of the United States.

Let me express my thanks to the historic slate of candidates who accompanied me on this journey, and especially the one who traveled the farthest -- a champion for working Americans and an inspiration to my daughters and to yours -- Hillary Rodham Clinton. To President Clinton, who last night made the case for change as only he can make it; to Ted Kennedy, who embodies the spirit of service; and to the next vice president of the United States, Joe Biden, I thank you. I am grateful to finish this journey with one of the finest statesmen of our time, a man at ease with everyone from world leaders to the conductors on the Amtrak train he still takes home every night.

To the love of my life, our next first lady, Michelle Obama, and to Sasha and Malia -- I love you so much, and I'm so proud of all of you.

Four years ago, I stood before you and told you my story -- of the brief union between a young man from Kenya and a young woman from Kansas who weren't well-off or well-known, but shared a belief that in America, their son could achieve whatever he put his mind to.

It is that promise that has always set this country apart -- that through hard work and sacrifice, each of us can pursue our individual dreams but still come together as one American family, to ensure that the next generation can pursue their dreams as well.

That's why I stand here tonight. Because for 232 years, at each moment when that promise was in jeopardy, ordinary men and women -- students and soldiers, farmers and teachers, nurses and janitors -- found the courage to keep it alive.

We meet at one of those defining moments -- a moment when our nation is at war, our economy is in turmoil, and the American promise has been threatened once more.

Tonight, more Americans are out of work and more are working harder for less. More of you have lost your homes and even more are watching your home values plummet. More of you have cars you can't afford to drive, credit card bills you can't afford to pay, and tuition that's beyond your reach.

These challenges are not all of government's making. But the failure to respond is a direct result of a broken politics in Washington and the failed policies of George W. Bush.

America, we are better than these last eight years. We are a better country than this.

This country is more decent than one where a woman in Ohio, on the brink of retirement, finds herself one illness away from disaster after a lifetime of hard work.

This country is more generous than one where a man in Indiana has to pack up the equipment he's worked on for 20 years and watch it shipped off to China, and then chokes up as he explains how he felt like a failure when he went home to tell his family the news.

We are more compassionate than a government that lets veterans sleep on our streets and families slide into poverty; that sits on its hands while a major American city drowns before our eyes.

Tonight, I say to the American people, to Democrats and Republicans and independents across this great land -- enough! This moment -- this election -- is our chance to keep, in the 21st century, the American promise alive. Because next week, in Minnesota, the same party that brought you two terms of George Bush and Dick Cheney will ask this country for a third. And we are here because we love this country too much to let the next four years look like the last eight. On November 4, we must stand up and say: "Eight is enough."

Now let there be no doubt. The Republican nominee, John McCain, has worn the uniform of our country with bravery and distinction, and for that we owe him our gratitude and respect. And next week, we'll also hear about those occasions when he's broken with his party as evidence that he can deliver the change that we need.

But the record's clear: John McCain has voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time. Sen. McCain likes to talk about judgment, but really, what does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has been right more than 90 percent of the time? I don't know about you, but I'm not ready to take a 10 percent chance on change.

The truth is, on issue after issue that would make a difference in your lives -- on health care and education and the economy -- Sen. McCain has been anything but independent. He said that our economy has made "great progress" under this president. He said that the fundamentals of the economy are strong. And when one of his chief advisers -- the man who wrote his economic plan -- was talking about the anxiety Americans are feeling, he said that we were just suffering from a "mental recession," and that we've become, and I quote, "a nation of whiners."

A nation of whiners? Tell that to the proud autoworkers at a Michigan plant who, after they found out it was closing, kept showing up every day and working as hard as ever, because they knew there were people who counted on the brakes that they made. Tell that to the military families who shoulder their burdens silently as they watch their loved ones leave for their third or fourth or fifth tour of duty. These are not whiners. They work hard and give back and keep going without complaint. These are the Americans that I know.

Now, I don't believe that Sen. McCain doesn't care what's going on in the lives of Americans. I just think he doesn't know. Why else would he define middle-class as someone making under $5 million a year? How else could he propose hundreds of billions in tax breaks for big corporations and oil companies but not one penny of tax relief to more than 100 million Americans? How else could he offer a health care plan that would actually tax people's benefits, or an education plan that would do nothing to help families pay for college, or a plan that would privatize Social Security and gamble your retirement?

It's not because John McCain doesn't care. It's because John McCain doesn't get it.

For over two decades, he's subscribed to that old, discredited Republican philosophy -- give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. In Washington, they call this the Ownership Society, but what it really means is -- you're on your own. Out of work? Tough luck. No health care? The market will fix it. Born into poverty? Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps -- even if you don't have boots. You're on your own.

Well it's time for them to own their failure. It's time for us to change America.

You see, we Democrats have a very different measure of what constitutes progress in this country.

We measure progress by how many people can find a job that pays the mortgage; whether you can put a little extra money away at the end of each month so you can someday watch your child receive her college diploma. We measure progress in the 23 million new jobs that were created when Bill Clinton was president -- when the average American family saw its income go up $7,500 instead of down $2,000 like it has under George Bush.

We measure the strength of our economy not by the number of billionaires we have or the profits of the Fortune 500, but by whether someone with a good idea can take a risk and start a new business, or whether the waitress who lives on tips can take a day off to look after a sick kid without losing her job -- an economy that honors the dignity of work.

The fundamentals we use to measure economic strength are whether we are living up to that fundamental promise that has made this country great -- a promise that is the only reason I am standing here tonight.

Because in the faces of those young veterans who come back from Iraq and Afghanistan, I see my grandfather, who signed up after Pearl Harbor, marched in Patton's Army, and was rewarded by a grateful nation with the chance to go to college on the GI Bill.

In the face of that young student who sleeps just three hours before working the night shift, I think about my mom, who raised my sister and me on her own while she worked and earned her degree; who once turned to food stamps but was still able to send us to the best schools in the country with the help of student loans and scholarships.

When I listen to another worker tell me that his factory has shut down, I remember all those men and women on the South Side of Chicago who I stood by and fought for two decades ago after the local steel plant closed.

And when I hear a woman talk about the difficulties of starting her own business, I think about my grandmother, who worked her way up from the secretarial pool to middle-management, despite years of being passed over for promotions because she was a woman. She's the one who taught me about hard work. She's the one who put off buying a new car or a new dress for herself so that I could have a better life. She poured everything she had into me. And although she can no longer travel, I know that she's watching tonight, and that tonight is her night as well.

I don't know what kind of lives John McCain thinks that celebrities lead, but this has been mine. These are my heroes. Theirs are the stories that shaped me. And it is on their behalf that I intend to win this election and keep our promise alive as president of the United States.

What is that promise?

It's a promise that says each of us has the freedom to make of our own lives what we will, but that we also have the obligation to treat each other with dignity and respect.

It's a promise that says the market should reward drive and innovation and generate growth, but that businesses should live up to their responsibilities to create American jobs, look out for American workers, and play by the rules of the road.

Ours is a promise that says government cannot solve all our problems, but what it should do is that which we cannot do for ourselves -- protect us from harm and provide every child a decent education; keep our water clean and our toys safe; invest in new schools and new roads and new science and technology.

Our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us, not hurt us. It should ensure opportunity not just for those with the most money and influence, but for every American who's willing to work.

That's the promise of America -- the idea that we are responsible for ourselves, but that we also rise or fall as one nation; the fundamental belief that I am my brother's keeper; I am my sister's keeper.

That's the promise we need to keep. That's the change we need right now. So let me spell out exactly what that change would mean if I am president.

Change means a tax code that doesn't reward the lobbyists who wrote it, but the American workers and small businesses who deserve it.

Unlike John McCain, I will stop giving tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas, and I will start giving them to companies that create good jobs right here in America.

I will eliminate capital gains taxes for the small businesses and the start-ups that will create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow.

I will cut taxes -- cut taxes -- for 95 percent of all working families. Because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.

And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as president: in 10 years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East.

Washington's been talking about our oil addiction for the last 30 years, and John McCain has been there for 26 of them. In that time, he's said no to higher fuel-efficiency standards for cars, no to investments in renewable energy, no to renewable fuels. And today, we import triple the amount of oil as the day that Sen. McCain took office.

Now is the time to end this addiction, and to understand that drilling is a stop-gap measure, not a long-term solution. Not even close.

As president, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I'll help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here in America. I'll make it easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I'll invest $150 billion over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy -- wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and 5 million new jobs that pay well and can't ever be outsourced.

America, now is not the time for small plans.

Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, because it will take nothing less to compete in the global economy. Michelle and I are only here tonight because we were given a chance at an education. And I will not settle for an America where some kids don't have that chance. I'll invest in early childhood education. I'll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. And in exchange, I'll ask for higher standards and more accountability. And we will keep our promise to every young American -- if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make sure you can afford a college education.

Now is the time to finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American. If you have health care, my plan will lower your premiums. If you don't, you'll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves. And as someone who watched my mother argue with insurance companies while she lay in bed dying of cancer, I will make certain those companies stop discriminating against those who are sick and need care the most.

Now is the time to help families with paid sick days and better family leave, because nobody in America should have to choose between keeping their jobs and caring for a sick child or ailing parent.

Now is the time to change our bankruptcy laws, so that your pensions are protected ahead of CEO bonuses; and the time to protect Social Security for future generations.

And now is the time to keep the promise of equal pay for an equal day's work, because I want my daughters to have exactly the same opportunities as your sons.

Now, many of these plans will cost money, which is why I've laid out how I'll pay for every dime -- by closing corporate loopholes and tax havens that don't help America grow. But I will also go through the federal budget, line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work and making the ones we do need work better and cost less -- because we cannot meet 21st century challenges with a 20th century bureaucracy.

And Democrats, we must also admit that fulfilling America's promise will require more than just money. It will require a renewed sense of responsibility from each of us to recover what John F. Kennedy called our "intellectual and moral strength." Yes, government must lead on energy independence, but each of us must do our part to make our homes and businesses more efficient. Yes, we must provide more ladders to success for young men who fall into lives of crime and despair. But we must also admit that programs alone can't replace parents; that government can't turn off the television and make a child do her homework; that fathers must take more responsibility for providing the love and guidance their children need.

Individual responsibility and mutual responsibility -- that's the essence of America's promise.

And just as we keep our keep our promise to the next generation here at home, so must we keep America's promise abroad. If John McCain wants to have a debate about who has the temperament, and judgment, to serve as the next commander in chief, that's a debate I'm ready to have.

For while Sen. McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing that it would distract us from the real threats we face. When John McCain said we could just "muddle through" in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell -- but he won't even go to the cave where he lives.

And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we're wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.

we need. That won't keep America safe. We need a president who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past.

You don't defeat a terrorist network that operates in 80 countries by You don't protect Israel and deter Iran just by talking tough in Washington. You can't truly stand up for Georgia when you've strained our oldest alliances. If John McCain wants to follow George Bush with more tough talk and bad strategy, that is his choice -- but it is not the change we need.

We are the party of Roosevelt. We are the party of Kennedy. So don't tell me that Democrats won't defend this country. Don't tell me that Democrats won't keep us safe. The Bush-McCain foreign policy has squandered the legacy that generations of Americans -- Democrats and Republicans -- have built, and we are here to restore that legacy.

As commander in chief, I will never hesitate to defend this nation, but I will only send our troops into harm's way with a clear mission and a sacred commitment to give them the equipment they need in battle and the care and benefits they deserve when they come home.

I will end this war in Iraq responsibly, and finish the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I will rebuild our military to meet future conflicts. But I will also renew the tough, direct diplomacy that can prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and curb Russian aggression. I will build new partnerships to defeat the threats of the 21st century: terrorism and nuclear proliferation; poverty and genocide; climate change and disease. And I will restore our moral standing, so that America is once again that last, best hope for all who are called to the cause of freedom, who long for lives of peace, and who yearn for a better future.

These are the policies I will pursue. And in the weeks ahead, I look forward to debating them with John McCain.

But what I will not do is suggest that the senator takes his positions for political purposes. Because one of the things that we have to change in our politics is the idea that people cannot disagree without challenging each other's character and patriotism.

The times are too serious, the stakes are too high for this same partisan playbook. So let us agree that patriotism has no party. I love this country, and so do you, and so does John McCain. The men and women who serve in our battlefields may be Democrats and Republicans and independents, but they have fought together and bled together and some died together under the same proud flag. They have not served a Red America or a Blue America -- they have served the United States of America.

So I've got news for you, John McCain. We all put our country first.

America, our work will not be easy. The challenges we face require tough choices, and Democrats as well as Republicans will need to cast off the worn-out ideas and politics of the past. For part of what has been lost these past eight years can't just be measured by lost wages or bigger trade deficits. What has also been lost is our sense of common purpose -- our sense of higher purpose. And that's what we have to restore.

We may not agree on abortion, but surely we can agree on reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies in this country. The reality of gun ownership may be different for hunters in rural Ohio than for those plagued by gang-violence in Cleveland, but don't tell me we can't uphold the Second Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals. I know there are differences on same-sex marriage, but surely we can agree that our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters deserve to visit the person they love in the hospital and to live lives free of discrimination. Passions fly on immigration, but I don't know anyone who benefits when a mother is separated from her infant child or an employer undercuts American wages by hiring illegal workers. This, too, is part of America's promise -- the promise of a democracy where we can find the strength and grace to bridge divides and unite in common effort.

I know there are those who dismiss such beliefs as happy talk. They claim that our insistence on something larger, something firmer and more honest in our public life is just a Trojan Horse for higher taxes and the abandonment of traditional values. And that's to be expected. Because if you don't have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare the voters. If you don't have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.

You make a big election about small things.

And you know what -- it's worked before. Because it feeds into the cynicism we all have about government. When Washington doesn't work, all its promises seem empty. If your hopes have been dashed again and again, then it's best to stop hoping, and settle for what you already know.

I get it. I realize that I am not the likeliest candidate for this office. I don't fit the typical pedigree, and I haven't spent my career in the halls of Washington.

But I stand before you tonight because all across America something is stirring. What the naysayers don't understand is that this election has never been about me. It's been about you.

For 18 long months, you have stood up, one by one, and said enough to the politics of the past. You understand that in this election, the greatest risk we can take is to try the same old politics with the same old players and expect a different result. You have shown what history teaches us -- that at defining moments like this one, the change we need doesn't come from Washington. Change comes to Washington. Change happens because the American people demand it -- because they rise up and insist on new ideas and new leadership, a new politics for a new time.

America, this is one of those moments.

I believe that as hard as it will be, the change we need is coming. Because I've seen it. Because I've lived it. I've seen it in Illinois, when we provided health care to more children and moved more families from welfare to work. I've seen it in Washington, when we worked across party lines to open up government and hold lobbyists more accountable, to give better care for our veterans and keep nuclear weapons out of terrorist hands.

And I've seen it in this campaign. In the young people who voted for the first time, and in those who got involved again after a very long time. In the Republicans who never thought they'd pick up a Democratic ballot, but did. I've seen it in the workers who would rather cut their hours back a day than see their friends lose their jobs, in the soldiers who re-enlist after losing a limb, in the good neighbors who take a stranger in when a hurricane strikes and the floodwaters rise.

This country of ours has more wealth than any nation, but that's not what makes us rich. We have the most powerful military on Earth, but that's not what makes us strong. Our universities and our culture are the envy of the world, but that's not what keeps the world coming to our shores.

Instead, it is that American spirit -- that American promise -- that pushes us forward even when the path is uncertain; that binds us together in spite of our differences; that makes us fix our eye not on what is seen, but what is unseen, that better place around the bend.

That promise is our greatest inheritance. It's a promise I make to my daughters when I tuck them in at night, and a promise that you make to yours -- a promise that has led immigrants to cross oceans and pioneers to travel west; a promise that led workers to picket lines, and women to reach for the ballot.

And it is that promise that 45 years ago today, brought Americans from every corner of this land to stand together on a Mall in Washington, before Lincoln's Memorial, and hear a young preacher from Georgia speak of his dream.

The men and women who gathered there could've heard many things. They could've heard words of anger and discord. They could've been told to succumb to the fear and frustration of so many dreams deferred.

But what the people heard instead -- people of every creed and color, from every walk of life -- is that in America, our destiny is inextricably linked. That together, our dreams can be one.

"We cannot walk alone," the preacher cried. "And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We cannot turn back."

America, we cannot turn back. Not with so much work to be done. Not with so