The Case for Rove is Absurd
The defense for Karl Rove is becoming increasingly desperate and unconvincing. They point to the text of the email by Matt Cooper, "It was, [Karl Rove] said, Wilson's wife, who apparently works at the [Central Intelligence Agency] on wmd who authorized the trip."
They argue that Rove didn't actually name Ambassador Joseph Wilson's wife, why, he merely made it so a witless child could figure it out. So he didn't technically break any laws by naming Plame. They argue that there is no evidence he knew she was a covert agent; of course not. He also didn't say he wanted to spend the rest of his life in jail. He's simply revealed the identity of a CIA agent; and hey, who knew there were any covert agents at the CIA? Why, that would require that Karl Rove had a thought in his head, and everyone knows he's dumb as a stump.
And then they go for what they view as their strongest argument...Karl Rove wasn't trying to reveal a CIA agent's identity, he did that carelessly, without even noticing (and do we want to see that sort of behavior from government officials?), in his effort to discredit Ambassador Wilson and his investigation of Iraqi WMD charges. But that's absurd. It's just silly. The problem with that claim is that, even at the time, the evidence that Wilson had presented was undisputed. The document showing nuclear material sales from Niger to Iraq was an obvious forgery, featuring a supposed signature of a Nigeran government minister who’d been out of office for years, that wasn't even on official government stationery. Wilson pointed this out. The other facts he had unearthed were equally undisputed.
To try to discredit Ambassador Wilson by suggesting a sort of nepotism got him the job would only make sense if the evidence he provided was less than perfectly accurate. Years ago, I had a political science professor, who asked what proved a theory? The answer, of course, is not that the theorist had credentials, or anything else but that it works; it fits all of the facts.
Ambassador Wilson argued that the administration was relying on falsehoods and hyped intelligence to beat the drum for war with Iraq. His theory fit all the facts then. It fits all the facts now. If his wife actually got him the gig investigating Iraq's potential for building WMDs, she could not be condemned, or he discredited, because of it. She should have been promoted for making an appointment that provided intelligence more accurate than many of the Director of Central Intelligence's other agents were providing at the time.
So, because of the impossibility of discrediting Wilson, Karl Rove chose to exact revenge by disclosing Valerie Plame’s work for the CIA. He cloaked it in an attempt to discredit Ambassador Wilson that he had to know was absolutely doomed to fail. By revealing the identity of a covert agent in a casual, almost backhanded way, while simultaneously exercising scrupulous care to not actually using her name (one of the elements of the crime) but still making it ridiculously easy to find that name, Rove made it clear that he was conscious of the damage he was doing to a valued covert agent and to national security.
He knew what he was doing. He knew Plame was a secret agent. He wanted to destroy, or at least cripple, her career. He was indifferent to what that did to national security, or to the effort to protect America from the proliferation of biological and nuclear weapons; a Republican political operative cares not for such things.
Rove just didn't want to get thrown in jail for it.
10:50:51 AM
|