| January 2005 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| 9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
| 16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
| 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
| 30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dec Feb |
Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
E-mail this blog's author, Massimo Pigliucci: 
|
|
 |
Sunday, January 23, 2005 |
OK then, for the first time in the history of American education,
public school students had to hear some nonsense about the possibility
that the universe has been "intelligently designed" (what about
tsunamis?, one would immediately want to ask), though the designer was
left unspecified by the administrators who read a statement to several
science classes (the teachers refused to do it).
Moreover, when students started asking questions about intelligent
design, the administrators left the classroom, suggesting that
questions on the matter should be asked at home. Right, so why not let
the whole matter to be
discussed at home, in church, or even in philosophy or comparative
religions classes? But not science, c'mon! To call this "an honest
scientific evaluation of the theory of evolution" is a travesty, and
one that is already been challenged in court. More on this as the court
date (September 26) approaches...
9:27:07 PM
|
|
|