<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:55:06 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>meersan: Reviews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.salon.com/0004483/categories/reviews/</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2005 meersan</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:55:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>
		<managingEditor>meersan@hotmail.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>meersan@hotmail.com</webMaster>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 
		<skipHours>
			<hour>0</hour>
			<hour>1</hour>
			<hour>2</hour>
			<hour>3</hour>
			<hour>4</hour>
			<hour>5</hour>
			<hour>6</hour>
			<hour>9</hour>
			</skipHours>
		<cloud domain="rcs.salon.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;H1&gt;eMusic vs ITMS : High-Gloss Music Store Smackdown&lt;/H1&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;images/EMusic.gif&quot; width=&quot;71&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;imageright&quot;&gt;Putting aside all the candyass objections to subscription vs. purchase-based models, I decided to investigate two major, legal digital music purveyors: Apple&apos;s iTunes music store and eMusic&apos;s MP3 download service.  Who wins?  Who dies?  I decide!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First up, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/itunes/&quot;&gt;iTunes&lt;/a&gt;.  Meh.   I object to Apple&apos;s iTunes on two grounds:&lt;BR /&gt;
1) 128 bitrate AAC.  Why?  &lt;I&gt;Why?!&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
2) DRM, which is illegal for me to remove&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At first sight, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emusic.com/&quot;&gt;eMusic&lt;/a&gt; offers a compelling alternative to iTunes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;The good:&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
1) 192 VBR LAME --alt-preset-standard MP3 encoding.  La cr&amp;egrave;me de la cr&amp;egrave;me.  This I can get behind; it&apos;s what I use for my personal collection.&lt;BR /&gt;
2) No DRM.  eMusic trusts me to be an adult--what a concept!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;The bad:&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
1) Although eMusic positions themselves chiefly as purveyors of &quot;indie&quot; mp3s, iTunes has more indie music!  Go look for recent stuff by Lemonjelly or Jans Lekman and you will not find it on EMusic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Therefore I have sailed the seas&lt;/I&gt; and canceled my EMusic account.  As another strange plus to choosing eMusic, cancellation is a breeze and can be done through their website.  This is way cooler than Netflix or Earthlink, who force you to call their hallucination-inducing tech support to cancel your account.  (Note: I savor and love my Netflix account.  Earthlink es del diablo.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Given my objections above and my possession of an iPod Photo which I regard with the tenderest affection, you&apos;ll understand I would not glance at Napster except to spit across its path.  eMusic might be ok for the occasional download, if you can avoid getting suckered into a subscription, but there is still, for me, no ideal music store from which to make legal purchases.  Looks like I get to visit the used CD store or The Site That Must Not Be Named.  Since musical preferences are so individual, however, &lt;I&gt;your mileage will vary.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://blogs.salon.com/0004483/categories/reviews/2005/03/29.html#a38</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://rcs.salon.com/rcsComments/comments?u=4483&amp;amp;p=38&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.salon.com%2F0004483%2F2005%2F03%2F29.html%23a38</comments>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
