Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Just When You Thought They Couldn't Possibly Get

Any Dumber. . .

Right city, wrong state

FEMA accused of flying evacuees to wrong Charleston

Tuesday, September 6, 2005; Posted: 11:29 p.m. EDT (03:29 GMT)

(CNN) -- Add geography to the growing list of FEMA fumbles.

A South Carolina health official said his colleagues scrambled Tuesday when FEMA gave

only a half-hour notice to prepare for the arrival of a plane carrying as many as 180 evacuees

to Charleston.

But the plane, instead, landed in Charleston, West Virginia, 400 miles away.

It was not known whether arrangements have been made to care for the evacuees or

transport them to the correct destination.

A call seeking comment from FEMA was not immediately returned.

"We called in all the available resources," said Dr. John Simkovich, director of public

health for the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.

"They responded within 30 minutes, which is phenomenal, to meet the needs of the

citizens coming in from Louisiana," he said.

Simkovich said that the agency had described some of the evacuees as needing

"some minor treatment ... possibly some major treatment."

"Unfortunately, the plane did not come in," Simkovich said. "There was a mistake

in the system, coming out through FEMA, that we did not receive the aircraft this

afternoon. It went to Charleston, West Virginia."

A line of buses and ambulances idled behind him at Charleston International Airport

as he described what happened.

"This is a 'no event' for today," Simkovich said.


8:09:00 PM    comment []  



Quote of the Day

Another rare beauty from the ever-reliable Asshole of the Century: 

 

"I mean, you have people who don’t heed those (hurricane) warnings and then put people at

 risk as a result of not heeding those warnings. There may be a need to look at tougher

 penalties on those who decide to ride it out and understand that there are consequences

 to not leaving."

--Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) 


4:42:47 PM    comment []  


An E-Mail From John Kerry (Remember Him?)

If Kerry had Been This Combative, This Spirited, This Impassioned last year at this time,

he might be President today. Oh well. Anyway, like Al Gore, he is a much better ex-candidate

than candidate. His e-mails, like the one below, are terrific.

Dear Michael,

"More tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans are off the table." Those are the words that America is

waiting to hear from President Bush. At a time of crisis and enormous need, it should be an easy

decision for him to make. He could make the announcement tomorrow.

There is hurt and suffering all around us. Estimates are that it will cost as much as $150 billion

to help the hard-hit people and communities of the Gulf Coast get back on their feet following

Katrina's devastation. And the Bush administration's failed policies in Iraq are draining billions

of dollars from our treasury every month.

But still, Republican leaders refuse to abandon their obsession with granting still more tax

cuts to the wealthy and well-connected. Don't let them get away with it.

Sign our "Don't You Dare" petition right now.

http://www.johnkerry.com/petition/taxcuts.php

Believe it or not, with all our nation is going through, there are Republicans still pushing

to put tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans on Congress' agenda this fall.

Republican leaders were forced to postpone plans for an immediate vote this week on

eliminating the estate tax. But, they haven't backed off their larger plan for more tax cuts to

benefit the wealthiest Americans.

This is a test of what kind of country we are. Are we an America that responds to crisis by

helping the most vulnerable in times of need, or do we just give more to those who have the

most?

Please join today in demanding that Republican leaders forego any and all plans to lavish

tax cuts on the wealthy at this moment of crisis.

http://www.johnkerry.com/petition/taxcuts.php

What can they be thinking? Why haven't President Bush, Senator Frist and Speaker

Hastert taken off the table the outrageous notion of bestowing more tax cuts on the wealthy

at a time like this? How long will it be before they start telling us that tax cuts for the

wealthy can provide just the stimulus we need to get the Gulf Coast economy moving

again?

Going forward with the GOP's next round of tax cuts for the wealthy would be a bitter

betrayal -- a slap in the face to the hundreds of thousands of Katrina survivors struggling

to put their lives back together. It's time for the President and his Republican colleagues

to send a clear, unambiguous message that they understand the situation our nation is

facing. The American people want to hear from them now -- and, until they back off

of their tax cuts for the wealthy, we'll make sure they hear from us.

http://www.johnkerry.com/petition/taxcuts.php

All around us, there are signs of American courage and American compassion. People

who lived through hell are finding the strength to carry on. People who know what their

fellow Americans are going through have reached out in one of the most far-reaching

displays of generosity in our nation's history.

Yet here the Republican Party's leaders sit back in Washington, desperately clinging

to the hope that they can force through another round of tax cuts for the chosen few.

They shouldn't wait a day longer before they make a clear commitment not to pursue more

tax cuts for the wealthy. And, until they come to their senses, we'll keep the pressure on.

http://www.johnkerry.com/petition/taxcuts.php

We've got to stop these tax cuts from diverting resources that are needed for vitally

important priorities such as helping those who have lost so much -- and have so far to go

before they are on the road to recovery.

I hope you'll sign our "Don't You Dare" petition today demanding that Republican leaders

abandon their plans to lavish more tax cuts on the wealthy. There has never been a more

important time than this to give voice to your values.

I hope you will stand with us.

Sincerely,

John Kerry

P.S. After you sign the petition, please forward it to everyone you can think of who might be

willing to sign. The more signatures we gather, the more quickly we can force Republican leaders

to take tax cuts for the wealthy off the table.


3:51:52 PM    comment []  


3:38:59 PM    comment []  

 

Saturday, September 24
Massive March, Rally & Festival


10:00AM All-Day Peace & Justice Festival Begins, Washington Monument Grounds
11:30AM Rally at Ellipse
12:30PM March steps off
3:00PM "Operation Ceasefire" Concert & Rally featuring Cindy Sheehan


 

END THE WAR ON IRAQ
BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW!
Leave no military bases behind
End the looting of Iraq
Stop the torture
Stop bankrupting our communities
No military recruitment in our schools

 

More than two years after the illegal and immoral U.S. invasion of Iraq, the

nightmare continues. More than 1600 U.S. soldiers have died, at least another

15,000 have been wounded; even the most conservative estimates of Iraqi

deaths number in the tens of thousands. Iraq, a once sovereign nation, now

lies in ruins under the military and corporate occupation of the United States;

U.S. promises to rebuild have not been kept and Iraqis still lack food, water,

electricity, and other basic needs.

A majority of Americans believe that this war never should have happened,

but our elected representatives in Washington continue to rubber-stamp the

Bush Administration's disastrous Iraq policies. They have given military

recruiters nearly unrestricted access to our schools -- and the Pentagon nearly

unrestricted access to our tax dollars. At a time when our vital social programs

are eroding or completely decimated, an overwhelming majority in Congress

recently approved Bush's request for an additional $82 billion in war funding,

and there's already talk of another $50 billion appropriation this fall.

It's time to hold all pro-war politicians accountable for the deaths, the

destruction, the lies, and the toll on our communities! Join United for Peace

and Justice in Washington, D.C. for three massive days of action against the

war: a major march, rally, and festival on Saturday, September 24; an

interfaith religious service and day of grassroots trainings on Sunday,

September 25; and a large-scale grassroots lobbying day and mass

nonviolent direct action and civil disobedience on Monday, September 26.

From every corner of this country, people will travel to Washington to bring

our demands directly to the policymakers responsible for this unjust war.

These three days of actions will send a clear message to the White House

and Congress: The Iraq war must end. It's time to bring all the troops home,

leaving no U.S. military bases behind, and to stop the corporate theft of

Iraq's resources. Instead of draining our national treasury for endless war,

we demand that our tax dollars be used to repair the damage done to Iraq

and to fund services in our communities. We call for an immediate end to

our government's assault on immigrants, the unethical pressures on our

young people to join the military, and the undermining of democracy through

relentless attacks on everyone's basic rights.

Our mobilization will coincide with the meetings of the International

Monetary Fund and World Bank, whose economic policies place corporate

profits ahead of basic human needs worldwide. We will speak out against

the corporate theft of Iraq's resources and the decimation of the Iraqi

economy through privatization and "free trade."

Join our weekend of action to stop this war, and help prevent any new wars!



Bumperstickers!

 

Speaking of cafepress.com, here are some of my recent favorites for sale

on their site:

Anti-Bush Yellow Ribbon 02 Sticker (Bumper)Support our troops impeach BushJanuary 20, 2009 Bumper Sticker "Send the Twins" Sticker (Bumper)Bush Spent your Social Security Bumper StickerOpen Mouthed Chimp Bumper-StickerFrodo Has Failed Sticker (Bumper)Blind Faith is not Patriotism Sticker (Bumper)Sticker (Bumper)

 

 


3:14:22 PM    comment []  


 


1:59:25 PM    comment []  


My Impulsive Self

Recently I found a great website called cafepress.com that enables one to buy, among

other things, bumper stickers for their '08 presidential candidate of choice. Impulsive

fellow that I am, I rushed right out and bought a Hillary Clinton sticker. Now I'm having

second thoughts. I'm a great admirer of the Clintons, although I've always felt that Bill's

presidency was much too conservative, but I'm feeling now that Hillary's  positioning

to the "center" is a rather gutless move that smacks of political opportunism. Too many

Democratic "leaders" these days are coming off as Republican Lite in order to placate

what they perceive to be the vast moderate majority. They're afraid to criticize Bush

and his band of criminals for fear as coming off as "radical" or "out of the mainstream".

Well I've got news for them: no one is as far out of this country's mainstream as

George W. Bush. No administration in the history of the country has been so radical.

Slowly, slowly, slowly the American public is waking to that reality. Bush's recent

37% approval rating is a clear indication that the only people he has left in his corner

are Jesus Nazis, Earth plunderers and paranoid suburbanites still deluding themselves

into thinking, for whatever reasons of their own, that this shitbag is on their side.

As I've noted earlier in this blog, the Democratic Party needs leaders, not timid

followers. I'm going to give Hillary the benefit of the doubt, and a little more time,

but if she doesn't show more spine in the coming months that bumper sticker's going

 to go.  There are, after all, other options:

"Russ Feingold President 2008" Sticker (Oval)"Brian Schweitzer 2008" Bumper Sticker

Bill Richardson for President Bumper StickerHOWARD DEAN '08 - 2008 Button (100 pk)     

"Al Gore President 2008" Bumper StickerBarbara Boxer for President Tile Box


12:25:58 PM    comment []  


A Sign of True Greatness

is to be ahead of the curve. Right now this guy is way, way, way ahead. Hopefully the curve will catch up.

Call for Timetable Sets Feingold Apart

- - - - - - - - - - - -

By FREDERIC J. FROMMER Associated Press Writer

September 07,2005 | WASHINGTON -- By issuing an early call for a timetable to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq, Sen. Russ Feingold could emerge as the Democrats' anti-war candidate of 2008, in the tradition of Eugene McCarthy and Howard Dean.

Although Democrats have been critical of President Bush's handling of the war in Iraq, they have been reluctant to call for a timetable to leave, fearing it could reinforce stereotypes that their party is weak on national security.

Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat who is comfortable on the outskirts of his party, counters that setting an end date in Iraq -- preferably by the end of 2006 -- would free U.S. leaders to focus on terror threats worldwide.

Right now, that sets him apart from other likely Democratic presidential candidates.

New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, for example, has called for more troops if they are needed to complete the mission. Retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark said that a timetable would be used against U.S. troops.

In a speech in Los Angeles last month, Feingold rejected what he called Bush's "false choice" between staying the course in Iraq or cutting bait.

"The Bush administration has been very successful in one thing: in intimidating people into not uttering the words timetable or timeframe," Feingold said, adding that any mention of the words is taboo in Congress.

As the first senator to call for a withdrawal timetable, Feingold finds himself in familiar terrain. In 2001, he was the only senator to vote against the USA Patriot Act, the post-Sept. 11 law that expanded the government's surveillance and prosecutorial powers.

Feingold was out of the country last week and unavailable for an interview. He has demurred when asked whether he would run for president, but his travels, including a scheduled visit to New Hampshire this month, have helped stoke talk of a candidacy.

Now his call for a troop withdrawal timetable has helped define what that campaign could look like.

"He's putting a marker down that an awful lot of his colleagues have been unwilling to do," said Norm Ornstein, a political analyst at the American Enterprise Institute.

Bill Dixon, a Madison, Wis., lawyer who ran Gary Hart's national 1988 presidential campaign, said, "I think Russ has catapulted himself above other Democrats nationally."

While Americans are growing restless with the conduct of the war, few seem receptive to Feingold's approach. An AP-Ipsos Poll last month found that 58 percent disapprove of the Bush administration's conduct of the war and consider it a mistake, but 60 percent want U.S. troops to stick it out until Iraq is stable.

But Feingold, who stresses he is proposing a target date, not a deadline, might also benefit from rising anger about the war. At a recent town hall meeting in Star Prairie, Wis., one man told Feingold he was "livid with anger" over the war.

"And I can no longer look at the president," he said to applause. "If I hear him speak, I hit the mute button."

Political analysts say if Feingold can tap that anger, he could emerge as the 2008 version of Dean, the former Vermont governor who vaulted to the lead in Democratic presidential polls before flaming out last year.

"It seems to me that the public, and in particular many Democratic Party activists, are way ahead of the politicians on this question," said Steve McMahon, a longtime Dean adviser. "Feingold's going where few politicians right now dare to go."

There are even comparisons to Eugene McCarthy, the former Minnesota senator whose 1968 anti-war challenge helped lead President Johnson not to seek re-election.

"McCarthy emerged in the person of Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin," wrote former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan in an Aug. 24 column.

Curtis Gans, who organized the "Dump Johnson Movement" in 1967 and became staff director of McCarthy's 1968 campaign, rejected that comparison.

"McCarthy ran at a time when he was virtually alone against a sitting president," said Gans, now director of the Committee for the Study of the American Electorate in Washington. "Feingold is running now for an open presidential seat."

Gans predicted that by 2007, all the Democratic candidates will have adopted Feingold's position.

"If he stakes his future on the war issue, that's not where someone will win," Gans said. "I don't think there will be that division in the Democratic Party."

Ken Mayer, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who served as an adviser to Feingold's 1992 and 1998 Senate campaigns, said Feingold's stance will help him offer a contrast to Clinton, the presumed front-runner.

"As she moves to the center, that opens up some space on the edges," Mayer said.


Salon provides breaking news articles from the Associated Press as a service to its readers, but does not edit the AP articles it publishes.

© 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.



11:41:34 AM    comment []  


Haunted by Hesitation

It took a while, but the president finally figured out a response to the destruction of

New Orleans.

Later this week (no point rushing things) W. is dispatching Dick Cheney to the rancid

lake that was a romantic city. The vice president has at long last lumbered back from a

Wyoming vacation, and, reportedly, from shopping for a $2.9 million waterfront estate

in St. Michael's, a retreat in the Chesapeake Bay where Rummy has a weekend home,

where "Wedding Crashers" was filmed and where rich lobbyists hunt.

Maybe Mr. Cheney is going down to New Orleans to hunt looters. Or to make sure that

Halliburton's lucrative contract to rebuild the city is watertight. Or maybe, since former

Senator John Breaux of Louisiana described the shattered parish as "Baghdad under water,"

the vice president plans to take his pal Ahmad Chalabi along for a consultation on destroying

minority rights.

The water that breached the New Orleans levees and left a million people homeless and

jobless has also breached the White House defenses. Reality has come flooding in.

Since 9/11, the Bush administration has been remarkably successful at blowing off "the

reality-based community," as it derisively calls the press.

But now, when W., Mr. Cheney, Laura, Rummy, Gen. Richard Myers, Michael Chertoff

and the rest of the gang tell us everything's under control, our cities are safe, stay the

course - who believes them?

This time we can actually see the bodies.

As the water recedes, more and more decaying bodies will testify to the callous and

stumblebum administration response to Katrina's rout of 90,000 square miles of the

South.

The Bush administration bungled the Iraq occupation, arrogantly throwing away State

Department occupation plans and C.I.A. insurgency warnings. But the human toll of those

mistakes has not been as viscerally evident because the White House pulled a curtain

over the bodies: the president has avoided the funerals of soldiers, and the Pentagon has

censored the coffins of the dead coming home and never acknowledges the number of

Iraqi civilians killed.

But this time, the bodies of those who might have been saved between Monday and Friday,

when the president failed to rush the necessary resources to a disaster that his own general

describes as "biblical," or even send in the 82nd Airborne, are floating up in front of our eyes.

New Orleans's literary lore and tourist lure was its fascination with the dead and undead, its

lavish annual Halloween party, its famous above-ground cemeteries, its love of vampires and

voodoo and zombies. But now that the city is decimated, reeking with unnecessary death and

destruction, the restless spirits of New Orleans will haunt the White House.

The administration's foreign policy is entirely constructed around American self-love -

the idea that the U.S. is superior, that we are the model everyone looks up to, that everyone

in the world wants what we have.

But when people around the world look at Iraq, they don't see freedom. They see chaos and

sectarian hatred. And when they look at New Orleans, they see glaring incompetence and

racial injustice, where the rich white people were saved and the poor black people were left

to die hideous deaths. They see some conservatives blaming the poor for not saving

themselves. So much for W.'s "culture of life."

The president won re-election because he said that the war in Iraq and the Homeland

Security Department would make us safer. Hogwash.

W.'s 2004 convention was staged like "The Magnificent Seven" with the Republicans'

swaggering tough guys - from Rudy Giuliani to Arnold Schwarzenegger to John McCain -

riding in to save an embattled town.

These were the steely-eyed gunslingers we needed to protect us, they said, not those

sissified girlie-men Democrats. But now it turns out that W. can't save the town, not even

from hurricane damage that everyone has been predicting for years, much less from

unpredictable terrorists.

His campaigns presented the arc of his life story as that of a man who stumbled around

until he was 40, then found himself and developed a laserlike focus.

But now that the people of New Orleans need an ark, we have to question the president's

arc. He's stumbling in Iraq and he's stumbling on Katrina.

Let's play the blame game: the man who benefited more than anyone in history from

safety nets set up by family did not bother to provide one for those who lost their families.

E-mail: liberties@nytimes.com

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

 


11:28:09 AM    comment []  


Osama and Katrina

On the day after 9/11, I was in Jerusalem and was interviewed by Israeli TV. The reporter asked me,

"Do you think the Bush administration is up to responding to this attack?" As best I can recall, I

answered: "Absolutely. One thing I can assure you about these guys is that they know how to pull the trigger."

It was just a gut reaction that George Bush and Dick Cheney were the right guys to deal with Osama.

 I was not alone in that feeling, and as a result, Mr. Bush got a mandate, almost a blank check, to rule from

 9/11 that he never really earned at the polls. Unfortunately, he used that mandate not simply to confront

 the terrorists but to take a radically uncompassionate conservative agenda - on taxes, stem cells, the

 environment and foreign treaties - that was going nowhere before 9/11, and drive it into a post-9/11

world. In that sense, 9/11 distorted our politics and society.

Well, if 9/11 is one bookend of the Bush administration, Katrina may be the other. If 9/11 put the wind

at President Bush's back, Katrina's put the wind in his face. If the Bush-Cheney team seemed to be the

right guys to deal with Osama, they seem exactly the wrong guys to deal with Katrina - and all the rot

and misplaced priorities it's exposed here at home.

These are people so much better at inflicting pain than feeling it, so much better at taking things apart

than putting them together, so much better at defending "intelligent design" as a theology than practicing

it as a policy.

For instance, it's unavoidably obvious that we need a real policy of energy conservation. But President

Bush can barely choke out the word "conservation." And can you imagine Mr. Cheney, who has already

denounced conservation as a "personal virtue" irrelevant to national policy, now leading such a campaign

or confronting oil companies for price gouging?

And then there are the president's standard lines: "It's not the government's money; it's your money,"

and, "One of the last things that we need to do to this economy is to take money out of your pocket

and fuel government." Maybe Mr. Bush will now also tell us: "It's not the government's hurricane -

it's your hurricane."

An administration whose tax policy has been dominated by the toweringly selfish Grover Norquist

- who has been quoted as saying: "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it

to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub" - doesn't have the

instincts for this moment. Mr. Norquist is the only person about whom I would say this: I hope he

owns property around the New Orleans levee that was never properly finished because of a lack

of tax dollars. I hope his basement got flooded. And I hope that he was busy drowning government

in his bathtub when the levee broke and that he had to wait for a U.S. Army helicopter to get

out of town.

The Bush team has engaged in a tax giveaway since 9/11 that has had one underlying assumption:

There will never be another rainy day. Just spend money. You knew that sooner or later there

would be a rainy day, but Karl Rove has assumed it wouldn't happen on Mr. Bush's watch - that

someone else would have to clean it up. Well, it did happen on his watch.

Besides ripping away the roofs of New Orleans, Katrina ripped away the argument that we

can cut taxes, properly educate our kids, compete with India and China, succeed in Iraq, keep

improving the U.S. infrastructure, and take care of a catastrophic emergency - without putting

ourselves totally into the debt of Beijing.

So many of the things the Bush team has ignored or distorted under the guise of fighting Osama

were exposed by Katrina: its refusal to impose a gasoline tax after 9/11, which would have begun

to shift our economy much sooner to more fuel-efficient cars, helped raise money for a rainy day

and eased our dependence on the world's worst regimes for energy; its refusal to develop some

form of national health care to cover the 40 million uninsured; and its insistence on cutting more

taxes, even when that has contributed to incomplete levees and too small an Army to deal with

 Katrina, Osama and Saddam at the same time.

As my Democratic entrepreneur friend Joel Hyatt once remarked, the Bush team's philosophy

since 9/11 has been: "We're at war. Let's party."

Well, the party is over. If Mr. Bush learns the lessons of Katrina, he has a chance to replace

his 9/11 mandate with something new and relevant. If that happens, Katrina will have

destroyed New Orleans, but helped to restore America. If Mr. Bush goes back to his politics as

usual, he'll be thwarted at every turn. Katrina will have destroyed a city and a presidency.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

11:17:08 AM    comment []  


The Wingnut Report. . .

My daily unearthing of web articles chronicling the ongoing malevolence of the Bush

Administration, Evangelical Christendom, Corporate Fascism, Faux News, Rush

Limbaugh and His Shittoheads, and other Toadstools of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy:

The "blame game"? You can play along at home

While insisting that now is no time for playing the "blame game," the president's supporters

are busy blaming state and local officials for the inadequate response to Hurricane Katrina.

They've claimed that Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco didn't declare a state of emergency.

She did, on Aug. 26, when the president was still on vacation. And they've claimed that Blanco

was slow to ask for federal help. In fact, Blanco wrote a letter to the president on Aug. 28 in

which she said that an "effective response" to Katrina's destruction would be "beyond the

capabilities of the state and affected local governments" and requested federal help to "save

lives" and "protect property."

The president was on vacation then, too.

But FEMA Director Michael Brown wasn't, and he got right to work. More or less.

Internal FEMA documents show that Brown waited five hours after Katrina struck

land on Aug. 29 before he asked Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to

send 1,000 department employees to the Gulf Coast. And even then, he suggested that

Homeland Security employees should have a couple of days to get themselves in place.

Once in place, the Homeland Security employees would, among things, "convey a

positive image" of the government's response to the hurricane, Brown told Chertoff.

-- Tim, Grieve, Salon.com

FEMA puts firefighters to work -- as props for Bush

From all across the nation, local fire departments have sent firefighters -- many of

them trained in emergency medicine and search-and-rescue techniques -- to help the

victims of Hurricane Katrina. The Federal Emergency Management Agency requested

the help. But when the firefighters arrived in Atlanta, loaded down with the firefighting

gear FEMA told them to bring, they were sent to a hotel to wait. Some of them have been

waiting for three or four days now. Some have been assigned to sit through an eight-hour

class on topics that included sexual harassment. And some have been dispatched to the

disaster area to work as human props behind George W. Bush as he toured the destruction.

We've said this before lately, and we'll say it again: We're not making this up.

As the Los Angeles Times reports, "Hundreds of firefighters who volunteered to help

rescue victims of Hurricane Katrina have instead been playing cards, taking classes on

the Federal Emergency Management Agency's history and lounging at an Atlanta

airport hotel for days. 'On the news every night you hear [hurricane victims say],

"How come everybody forgot us?"' said Joseph Manning, a firefighter from

Washington, Pa. 'We didn't forget. We're stuck in Atlanta drinking beer.'"

Well, not just drinking beer. The Salt Lake Tribune reports that FEMA put a team

of 50 firefighters on a flight to Louisiana Monday morning. Their mission: Stand

beside Bush as he toured the devastation -- just possibly not the best use for highly

trained emergency workers, and a job we thought was obsolete in the digital

age anyway.

FEMA defends the use -- or nonuse -- of the firefighters, saying that their chiefs

knew they were being sent to the Gulf Coast to work as community-relations

officers for FEMA. Apparently, that job entails working as human props and passing

out FEMA's phone number. "There are all of these guys with all of this training and

we're sending them out to hand out a phone number," an Oregon firefighter told the

Tribune.

On Monday, the Tribune says, some firefighters began to take off their FEMA-issued

T-shirts in protest. A FEMA spokesman responded by questioning the firefighters'

willingness to help in a time of need. "I would go back and ask the firefighter to revisit

his commitment to FEMA, to firefighting and to the citizens of this country," FEMA

spokeswoman Mary Hudak told the Tribune.

-- Tim Grieve, Salon.com

U.S. agency blocks photos of New Orleans dead
07 Sep 2005 00:56:29 GMT
Source: Reuters

NEW ORLEANS, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. government agency leading the rescue efforts after

Hurricane Katrina said on Tuesday it does not want the news media to take photographs of the

dead as they are recovered from the flooded New Orleans area.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency, heavily criticized for its slow response to the

devastation caused by the hurricane, rejected requests from journalists to accompany rescue

boats as they went out to search for storm victims.

An agency spokeswoman said space was needed on the rescue boats and that "the recovery

of the victims is being treated with dignity and the utmost respect."

"We have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media," the spokeswoman

said in an e-mailed response to a Reuters inquiry.

The Bush administration also has prevented the news media from photographing flag-

draped caskets of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, which has sparked criticism that the government

is trying to block images that put the war in a bad light.

The White House is under fire for its handling of the relief effort, which many

officials have charged was slow and bureacratic, contributing to the death and mayhem in

New Orleans after the storm struck on Aug. 29. (Additional reporting by Deborah Charles)

Disaster used as political payoff

Juan Gonzalez, New York Daily News

 

 

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has done it again.

Already under fire for its woeful response to Hurricane Katrina, the federal disaster agency appears to

have turned hurricane relief donations into a political payoff - until it was challenged.

All last week, FEMA bureaucrats gave prominent placement on the agency's Web site to

Operation Blessing, the Virginia-based charity run by controversial right-wing evangelist and

Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson.

For anyone wishing to donate only cash, the agency's site listed the names and phone numbers

of three groups: the Red Cross, Operation Blessing and America's Second Harvest, a national

coalition of food banks.

That first list was followed by a second, longer list of several dozen religious and nonsectarian

charities. This second list was for anyone who wanted to give either cash or noncash gifts.

Just as in an ordinary election, however, top ballot position makes it far more likely you'll

get noticed and chosen.

The same FEMA list was then disseminated by state and local governments throughout the

country. Both Gov. Pataki and Mayor Bloomberg, for example, placed the same top three

FEMA charities on their Hurricane Katrina press releases and Web sites last week.

Those familiar with Robertson and his charity were flabbergasted.

Operation Blessing, with a budget of $190 million, is an integral part of the Robertson

empire. Not only is he the chairman of the board, his wife is listed on its latest financial

report as its vice president, and one of his sons is on the board of directors.

Back in 1994, during the infamous Rwandan genocide, Robertson used his 700 Club's

daily cable operation to appeal to the American public for donations to fly humanitarian

supplies into Zaire to save the Rwandan refugees.

The planes purchased by Operation Blessing did a lot more than ferry relief supplies.

An investigation conducted by the Virginia attorney general's office concluded in 1999

that the planes were mostly used to transport mining equipment for a diamond operation

run by a for-profit company called African Development Corp.

And who do you think was the principal executive and sole shareholder of the

mining company?

You guessed it, Pat Robertson himself.

Robertson had landed the mining concession from his longtime friend Mobutu Sese

Seko, then the dictator of Zaire.

Investigators concluded that Operation Blessing "willfully induced contributions from

the public through the use of misleading statements ..."

After the investigation began, Robertson placated state regulators by personally

reimbursing his own charity $400,000 and by agreeing to tighten its bookkeeping

methods.

Separating Operation Blessing from Robertson's many politically oriented endeavors

is not that easy, however.

The biggest single U.S. recipient of the charity's largess, according to its latest financial

report, was Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network. It received $885,000 in the

fiscal year ended March 2004.

Robertson uses that Christian network for some markedly unchristian purposes.

A few years back, he repeatedly defended Charles Taylor, the former brutal dictator of

Liberia who is under indictment by a UN tribunal for war crimes.

As with Mobutu in the Congo, Robertson had a personal stake in the matter: He

had millions invested in a Liberian gold mine, thanks to Taylor, according to press reports.

Recently, Robertson called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

Those who know Robertson's record raised such an uproar that on Sunday FEMA suddenly

rearranged its entire Web site for hurricane donations.

Gone was Operation Blessing's name and choice location. Replacing it was an alphabetical

list of nearly 50 national relief organizations.

At FEMA, they take a while to get things right.

Originally published on September 6, 2005

 


10:48:01 AM    comment []  


 Good Morning, America!
 
Yes, this is a doctored photo, but I found the symbolism irresistable.
 

 

 

 
 
      



10:04:44 AM    comment []