Shucking oysters, shelling peas
Ruminations, fulminations, and recipes
Last updated:
6/16/2006; 6:00:51 PM


March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Feb   Apr



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Shucking oysters, shelling peas" in Radio UserLand.

Subscribe to this feed

Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?



Click to see the XML version of this web page.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.

Alexa Murray-Risso:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Thursday, March 30, 2006



Most of the changes I wanted to make to the appearance of this blog are done. I know it doesn’t look like much – if you take a peek at my “About” link to the left, you’ll discover why. I’m still working on setting up archives. If you have any comments, guidance, or suggestions to offer, I’d love to hear from you!


Regarding food-related matters, I just received a newsletter written by a celebrated European food writer that I hold in high esteem. I’d rather not mention who this person is, but I’d like to quote something he wrote in today's newsletter (what follows is my personal, watered-down translation – I take full responsibility for any errors and omissions):

“…the bad thing about blogs is that they allow many non-qualified people to pass for new Ruth Reichls or young Veronellis by putting three photos [and] two recipes on the web…And they always find somebody who believes them [and] they start believing it themselves…”

Naturally, I refute this assessment as shockingly simplistic and chauvinistic. It seems prudent to recall that there are different kinds of food writing, each with its own code of practice and standards, its own audience and objectives. To assume that his approach is the only way to write about food betrays not only an excess of arrogance, but also of ignorance.

He mentions, after his brief but severe rant, a handful of food blogs that he considers exceptional and, having visited a few of them on occasion over the past few months, I agree with his assessment: they are well-written, well-researched, and interesting. But food blogging is no different from any other endeavor: it can be excellent, mediocre, or poor. Some bloggers just do it better. And even the same food blogger might write differently from day to day, producing startling insight in sterling prose on one occasion and rehashed reasoning in awkward sentences on the next: this is true for as great a writer as M.F.K. Fisher!

Meanspiritedness is hardly the way to improve food blogging or food journalism. But perhaps silence rather than improvement is what this food writer seeks.





7:00:10 PM    



© Copyright 2006 Alexa Murray-Risso. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 6/16/2006; 6:00:51 PM.
Powered by